Andrew Nembhard
IND · 2025-26Primary starterHigh evidenceWhat does Andrew Nembhard actually supply on the floor?
Andrew Nembhard's strongest evidenced functions are passing, creation, shooting; the weakest available areas are rebounding, rim protection, event creation. The profile is tied to IND for 2025-26.
Function profile
2025-26 — eleven separate readings on a league scale. They are not additive.* limited evidence for that function. A dash means the evidence was insufficient — not a zero. Use the separate function strengths to evaluate role and roster fit; do not treat them as one player-value score. POA or switch conclusions require lineup, matchup, and assignment evidence beyond this profile.
Season by season
Every governed season profile on record.| Season | Team | Role | Evidence | Creation | Rim pressure | Shooting | Passing | Screening | Interior finish | Point of attack | Switch coverage | Rim protection | Event creation | Rebounding |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | IND | Primary starter | High evidence | 75 | 56 | 58 | 75 | — | 43 | — | — | 31 | 32 | 27 |
| 2024-25 | IND | — | High evidence | 74 | 53 | 42 | 76 | — | 30 | 58 | 59 | 40 | 58 | 38 |
| 2023-24 | IND | — | High evidence | 71 | 54 | 51 | 75 | — | 47 | 46 | 48 | 39 | 55 | 31 |
| 2022-23 | IND | — | High evidence | 74 | 45 | 52 | 80 | 45 | 31 | 43 | 44 | 40 | 50 | 39 |
What teams depended on him for
Seasons where a team's situation report named him a dependency case.IND did not have a sufficiently supported observed replacement lineup for Andrew Nembhard. The database keeps the functional-loss evidence but does not invent a replacement plan.
Replacement evidence
No replacement lineup is supported by the available evidence.
on floor 3207 possessions · off floor 3988 possessions
IND was highly dependent on Andrew Nembhard. Removing him cost about 27.2% of passing production, and lineups with him performed 6.1 points per 100 possessions better than lineups without him. The best supported replacement group was [Myles Turner, Pascal Siakam, Tyrese Haliburton, Bennedict Mathurin, Quenton Jackson] over 194 possessions.
Replacement evidence
Myles Turner · Pascal Siakam · Tyrese Haliburton · Bennedict Mathurin · Quenton Jackson
shrunk net -0.3070 over 194 possessions
on floor 4787 possessions · off floor 4402 possessions
IND did not have strong functional backup for Andrew Nembhard in passing; removing him cost about 31.9% of the team's production in that area. The next observed option was Tyrese Haliburton.
Replacement evidence
Myles Turner · Buddy Hield · Bruce Brown · Obi Toppin · Tyrese Haliburton
shrunk net 6.5370 over 352 possessions
on floor 4059 possessions · off floor 4758 possessions
IND did not have strong functional backup for Andrew Nembhard in passing; removing him cost about 36.3% of the team's production in that area. The next observed option was Tyrese Haliburton.
Replacement evidence
Myles Turner · Buddy Hield · Tyrese Haliburton · Aaron Nesmith · Jalen Smith
shrunk net -0.1070 over 195 possessions
on floor 3861 possessions · off floor 3460 possessions
Known contract calendar
Governed contract events naming this player — dates carry their honest quality.Andrew Nembhard has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2026 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. The player is inside the two-season extension-review horizon, but exact eligibility and value are not certified.
Andrew Nembhard has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2026 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. The player is inside the two-season extension-review horizon, but exact eligibility and value are not certified.
Andrew Nembhard has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2026 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. No extension-review trigger is applied yet.
Function scores, roles, dependence records and contract events are separate evidence. No combined player value, trade value or ranking is computed from them, and none of them is a causal impact claim.