← Player Board
Blake Wesley
Player Dossier

Blake Wesley

POR · 2025-26Emergency depthMixed coverage
Rim-pressure finisher · Transition finisher · Point-of-attack defender

What does Blake Wesley actually supply on the floor?

Blake Wesley's strongest evidenced functions are passing, event creation, creation; the weakest available areas are interior finishing, shooting, rim protection. The profile is tied to POR for 2025-26.

Function profile

2025-26 — eleven separate readings on a league scale. They are not additive.
Creation58
Rim pressure55
Shooting*42
Passing60
Screening*
Interior finish33
Point of attack*
Switch coverage*
Rim protection*48
Event creation59
Rebounding*52

* limited evidence for that function. A dash means the evidence was insufficient — not a zero. Use the separate function strengths to evaluate role and roster fit; do not treat them as one player-value score. POA or switch conclusions require lineup, matchup, and assignment evidence beyond this profile.

Season by season

Every governed season profile on record.
SeasonTeamRoleEvidenceCreationRim pressureShootingPassingScreeningInterior finishPoint of attackSwitch coverageRim protectionEvent creationRebounding
2025-26POREmergency depthMixed coverage5855426033485952
2024-25SASMixed coverage63574471325152406247
2023-24SASMixed coverage58613665354647365141
2022-23SASMixed coverage55465159294038405236

What teams depended on him for

Seasons where a team's situation report named him a dependency case.
POR · 2025-26Observed replacement lineup exists

POR had a supported lineup path without Blake Wesley: [Deni Avdija, Shaedon Sharpe, Kris Murray, Toumani Camara, Donovan Clingan] at 1.1 adjusted net points per 100 possessions over 206 possessions. This is an observed option, not proof it is universally better.

rotation 9%loses 2.6% of passing
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without him

Deni Avdija · Shaedon Sharpe · Kris Murray · Toumani Camara · Donovan Clingan

shrunk net 1.1120 over 206 possessions

on floor 672 possessions · off floor 7151 possessions

SAS · 2024-25Lineup performance dependence

SAS lineups performed 3.7 points per 100 possessions better with Blake Wesley than without him. The best supported alternative was [Chris Paul, Harrison Barnes, Devin Vassell, Jeremy Sochan, Victor Wembanyama] over 263 possessions.

rotation 17%loses 7.7% of passing
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without him

Chris Paul · Harrison Barnes · Devin Vassell · Jeremy Sochan · Victor Wembanyama

shrunk net 4.7280 over 263 possessions

on floor 1237 possessions · off floor 5961 possessions

SAS · 2023-24Observed replacement lineup exists

SAS had a supported lineup path without Blake Wesley: [Keldon Johnson, Devin Vassell, Tre Jones, Jeremy Sochan, Victor Wembanyama] at 5.9 adjusted net points per 100 possessions over 275 possessions. This is an observed option, not proof it is universally better.

rotation 22%loses 5.8% of passing
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without him

Keldon Johnson · Devin Vassell · Tre Jones · Jeremy Sochan · Victor Wembanyama

shrunk net 5.9350 over 275 possessions

on floor 1654 possessions · off floor 5874 possessions

SAS · 2022-23Replacement lineup exists, with a performance cost

SAS had an observed replacement lineup for Blake Wesley, but it came with a performance cost. The supported alternative was [Jakob Poeltl, Keldon Johnson, Devin Vassell, Tre Jones, Jeremy Sochan] at -1.0 adjusted net points per 100 possessions over 363 possessions.

rotation 16%loses 4.9% of passing
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without him

Jakob Poeltl · Keldon Johnson · Devin Vassell · Tre Jones · Jeremy Sochan

shrunk net -0.9990 over 363 possessions

on floor 1213 possessions · off floor 6156 possessions

Known contract calendar

Governed contract events naming this player — dates carry their honest quality.

No governed contract-calendar events name this player.

Function scores, roles, dependence records and contract events are separate evidence. No combined player value, trade value or ranking is computed from them, and none of them is a causal impact claim.