Cedi Osman
SAS · 2023-24Mixed coverageWhat does Cedi Osman actually supply on the floor?
Cedi Osman's strongest evidenced functions are passing, shooting, creation; the weakest available areas are rim protection, event creation, interior finishing. The profile is tied to SAS for 2023-24.
Function profile
2023-24 — eleven separate readings on a league scale. They are not additive.* limited evidence for that function. A dash means the evidence was insufficient — not a zero. Use the separate function strengths to evaluate role and roster fit; do not treat them as one player-value score. POA or switch conclusions require lineup, matchup, and assignment evidence beyond this profile.
Season by season
Every governed season profile on record.| Season | Team | Role | Evidence | Creation | Rim pressure | Shooting | Passing | Screening | Interior finish | Point of attack | Switch coverage | Rim protection | Event creation | Rebounding |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-24 | SAS | — | Mixed coverage | 54 | 48 | 59 | 60 | 50 | 42 | 39 | 42 | 39 | 40 | 51 |
| 2022-23 | CLE | — | High evidence | 45 | 49 | 59 | 47 | 44 | 44 | 54 | 54 | 38 | 33 | 43 |
| 2021-22 | CLE | — | Mixed coverage | 54 | 58 | 61 | 55 | — | 64 | — | — | 38 | 56 | 35 |
| 2020-21 | CLE | — | High evidence | 61 | 45 | 38 | 65 | — | 45 | — | — | 37 | 54 | 56 |
| 2019-20 | CLE | — | High evidence | 63 | 45 | 68 | 63 | — | 41 | — | — | 35 | 43 | 53 |
| 2018-19 | CLE | — | High evidence | 57 | 51 | 55 | 53 | — | 57 | — | — | 31 | 34 | 44 |
| 2017-18 | CLE | — | Mixed coverage | 29 | 52 | 56 | 30 | — | 34 | — | — | 42 | 49 | 54 |
What teams depended on him for
Seasons where a team's situation report named him a dependency case.SAS had a supported lineup path without Cedi Osman: [Keldon Johnson, Devin Vassell, Tre Jones, Jeremy Sochan, Victor Wembanyama] at 5.9 adjusted net points per 100 possessions over 275 possessions. This is an observed option, not proof it is universally better.
Replacement evidence
Keldon Johnson · Devin Vassell · Tre Jones · Jeremy Sochan · Victor Wembanyama
shrunk net 5.9350 over 275 possessions
on floor 2392 possessions · off floor 5152 possessions
CLE had a supported lineup path without Cedi Osman: [Donovan Mitchell, Jarrett Allen, Darius Garland, Isaac Okoro, Evan Mobley] at 5.8 adjusted net points per 100 possessions over 766 possessions. This is an observed option, not proof it is universally better.
Replacement evidence
Donovan Mitchell · Jarrett Allen · Darius Garland · Isaac Okoro · Evan Mobley
shrunk net 5.7950 over 766 possessions
on floor 2837 possessions · off floor 4569 possessions
CLE had a supported lineup path without Cedi Osman: [Jarrett Allen, Darius Garland, Dean Wade, Isaac Okoro, Evan Mobley] at 6.8 adjusted net points per 100 possessions over 204 possessions. This is an observed option, not proof it is universally better.
Replacement evidence
Jarrett Allen · Darius Garland · Dean Wade · Isaac Okoro · Evan Mobley
shrunk net 6.8170 over 204 possessions
on floor 2610 possessions · off floor 4578 possessions
CLE did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on Cedi Osman.
Replacement evidence
Kevin Love · Jarrett Allen · Collin Sexton · Darius Garland · Isaac Okoro
shrunk net 0.3030 over 161 possessions
on floor 2659 possessions · off floor 3493 possessions
CLE did not have a sufficiently supported observed replacement lineup for Cedi Osman. The database keeps the functional-loss evidence but does not invent a replacement plan.
Replacement evidence
No replacement lineup is supported by the available evidence.
on floor 3410 possessions · off floor 2174 possessions
CLE did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on Cedi Osman.
Replacement evidence
No replacement lineup is supported by the available evidence.
on floor 4432 possessions · off floor 2714 possessions
CLE did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on Cedi Osman.
Replacement evidence
LeBron James · JR Smith · Jose Calderon · Kevin Love · Jae Crowder
shrunk net 4.3840 over 653 possessions
on floor 1355 possessions · off floor 7661 possessions
Known contract calendar
Governed contract events naming this player — dates carry their honest quality.Cedi Osman has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2024 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. The player is inside the two-season extension-review horizon, but exact eligibility and value are not certified.
Cedi Osman has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2024 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. The player is inside the two-season extension-review horizon, but exact eligibility and value are not certified.
Cedi Osman has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2024 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. The player is inside the two-season extension-review horizon, but exact eligibility and value are not certified.
Cedi Osman has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2024 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. No extension-review trigger is applied yet.
Cedi Osman has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2020 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. The player is inside the two-season extension-review horizon, but exact eligibility and value are not certified.
Cedi Osman has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2020 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. The player is inside the two-season extension-review horizon, but exact eligibility and value are not certified.
Function scores, roles, dependence records and contract events are separate evidence. No combined player value, trade value or ranking is computed from them, and none of them is a causal impact claim.