Collin Sexton
What does Collin Sexton actually supply on the floor?
Collin Sexton's strongest evidenced functions are shooting, event creation, creation; the weakest available areas are rebounding, interior finishing, rim protection. These are full-season values across multiple teams, so team-specific fit is withheld.
Function profile
2025-26 — eleven separate readings on a league scale. They are not additive.* limited evidence for that function. A dash means the evidence was insufficient — not a zero. Use the separate function strengths to evaluate role and roster fit; do not treat them as one player-value score. POA or switch conclusions require lineup, matchup, and assignment evidence beyond this profile.
Season by season
Every governed season profile on record.| Season | Team | Role | Evidence | Creation | Rim pressure | Shooting | Passing | Screening | Interior finish | Point of attack | Switch coverage | Rim protection | Event creation | Rebounding |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | — | Bench creator | High evidence | 60 | 60 | 66 | 57 | — | 32 | — | — | 45 | 62 | 30 |
| 2024-25 | UTA | — | High evidence | 71 | 61 | 71 | 67 | — | 36 | 57 | 57 | 32 | 35 | 32 |
| 2023-24 | UTA | — | High evidence | 65 | 68 | 69 | 66 | — | 46 | 36 | 40 | 34 | 45 | 29 |
| 2022-23 | UTA | — | Mixed coverage | 66 | 64 | 59 | 61 | — | 41 | 39 | 42 | 44 | 34 | 47 |
| 2021-22 | CLE | — | Mixed coverage | 48 | 65 | 43 | 45 | — | 49 | 57 | 57 | 39 | 46 | 55 |
| 2020-21 | CLE | — | High evidence | 63 | 68 | 63 | 58 | — | 61 | 45 | 42 | 31 | 46 | 30 |
| 2019-20 | CLE | — | High evidence | 54 | 66 | 66 | 49 | — | 49 | — | — | 24 | 43 | 37 |
| 2018-19 | CLE | — | High evidence | 65 | 54 | 76 | 58 | — | 37 | — | — | 23 | 17 | 25 |
What teams depended on him for
Seasons where a team's situation report named him a dependency case.CHO did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on Collin Sexton.
Replacement evidence
Miles Bridges · LaMelo Ball · Moussa Diabate · Brandon Miller · Kon Knueppel
shrunk net 14.5160 over 988 possessions
on floor 1685 possessions · off floor 5409 possessions
CHI did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on Collin Sexton.
Replacement evidence
Nikola Vucevic · Coby White · Isaac Okoro · Josh Giddey · Matas Buzelis
shrunk net 0.2440 over 213 possessions
on floor 1302 possessions · off floor 6177 possessions
UTA did not have a sufficiently supported observed replacement lineup for Collin Sexton. The database keeps the functional-loss evidence but does not invent a replacement plan.
Replacement evidence
No replacement lineup is supported by the available evidence.
on floor 3281 possessions · off floor 4059 possessions
UTA lineups performed 4.1 points per 100 possessions better with Collin Sexton than without him. The best supported alternative was [Jordan Clarkson, Lauri Markkanen, John Collins, Ochai Agbaji, Keyonte George] over 227 possessions.
Replacement evidence
Jordan Clarkson · Lauri Markkanen · John Collins · Ochai Agbaji · Keyonte George
shrunk net -2.3540 over 227 possessions
on floor 3887 possessions · off floor 3503 possessions
UTA did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on Collin Sexton.
Replacement evidence
Kelly Olynyk · Lauri Markkanen · Talen Horton-Tucker · Ochai Agbaji · Walker Kessler
shrunk net 4.5500 over 287 possessions
on floor 2100 possessions · off floor 5255 possessions
CLE had a supported lineup path without Collin Sexton: [Jarrett Allen, Darius Garland, Dean Wade, Isaac Okoro, Evan Mobley] at 6.8 adjusted net points per 100 possessions over 204 possessions. This is an observed option, not proof it is universally better.
Replacement evidence
Jarrett Allen · Darius Garland · Dean Wade · Isaac Okoro · Evan Mobley
shrunk net 6.8170 over 204 possessions
on floor 583 possessions · off floor 6605 possessions
CLE did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on Collin Sexton.
Replacement evidence
No replacement lineup is supported by the available evidence.
on floor 3772 possessions · off floor 2388 possessions
CLE did not have a sufficiently supported observed replacement lineup for Collin Sexton. The database keeps the functional-loss evidence but does not invent a replacement plan.
Replacement evidence
No replacement lineup is supported by the available evidence.
on floor 3832 possessions · off floor 1753 possessions
CLE did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on Collin Sexton.
Replacement evidence
No replacement lineup is supported by the available evidence.
on floor 4720 possessions · off floor 2422 possessions
Known contract calendar
Governed contract events naming this player — dates carry their honest quality.Collin Sexton has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2026 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. The player is inside the two-season extension-review horizon, but exact eligibility and value are not certified.
Collin Sexton has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2026 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. The player is inside the two-season extension-review horizon, but exact eligibility and value are not certified.
Collin Sexton has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2026 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. No extension-review trigger is applied yet.
Function scores, roles, dependence records and contract events are separate evidence. No combined player value, trade value or ranking is computed from them, and none of them is a causal impact claim.