
Derrick Rose
What does Derrick Rose actually supply on the floor?
Derrick Rose's strongest evidenced functions are passing, creation, shooting; the weakest available areas are interior finishing, event creation, rim protection. The profile is tied to MEM for 2023-24.
Function profile
2023-24 — eleven separate readings on a league scale. They are not additive.* limited evidence for that function. A dash means the evidence was insufficient — not a zero. Use the separate function strengths to evaluate role and roster fit; do not treat them as one player-value score. POA or switch conclusions require lineup, matchup, and assignment evidence beyond this profile.
Season by season
Every governed season profile on record.| Season | Team | Role | Evidence | Creation | Rim pressure | Shooting | Passing | Screening | Interior finish | Point of attack | Switch coverage | Rim protection | Event creation | Rebounding |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-24 | MEM | — | Mixed coverage | 57 | 48 | 54 | 58 | — | 25 | 68 | 68 | 39 | 30 | 48 |
| 2022-23 | NYK | — | Mixed coverage | 52 | 51 | 45 | 50 | — | 41 | 51 | 51 | 47 | 39 | 44 |
| 2021-22 | NYK | — | Mixed coverage | 59 | 51 | 63 | 58 | — | 31 | 60 | 58 | 55 | 60 | 43 |
| 2020-21 | — | — | Mixed coverage | 84 | 52 | 61 | 78 | — | 47 | — | — | 48 | 67 | 37 |
| 2019-20 | DET | — | Mixed coverage | 75 | 53 | 41 | 73 | — | 20 | — | — | 40 | 50 | 34 |
| 2018-19 | MIN | — | High evidence | 69 | 54 | 62 | 67 | — | 47 | — | — | 36 | 31 | 24 |
| 2017-18 | — | — | Mixed coverage | 54 | 64 | 45 | 53 | — | 54 | — | — | 45 | 32 | 49 |
| 2016-17 | NYK | — | High evidence | 72 | 62 | 41 | 67 | — | 48 | — | — | 36 | 28 | 39 |
| 2015-16 | CHI | — | Limited evidence | 81 | 58 | 41 | 74 | — | — | — | — | 32 | 25 | — |
| 2014-15 | CHI | — | Limited evidence | 81 | 64 | 39 | 76 | — | — | — | — | 43 | 35 | — |
| 2013-14 | CHI | — | Limited evidence | 68 | 56 | 52 | 61 | — | — | — | — | 46 | 31 | — |
What teams depended on him for
Seasons where a team's situation report named him a dependency case.NYK had a supported lineup path without Derrick Rose: [Julius Randle, Jalen Brunson, Mitchell Robinson, RJ Barrett, Quentin Grimes] at 5.8 adjusted net points per 100 possessions over 1126 possessions. This is an observed option, not proof it is universally better.
Replacement evidence
Julius Randle · Jalen Brunson · Mitchell Robinson · RJ Barrett · Quentin Grimes
shrunk net 5.7960 over 1126 possessions
on floor 632 possessions · off floor 7455 possessions
NYK lineups performed 7.2 points per 100 possessions better with Derrick Rose than without him. The best supported alternative was [Kemba Walker, Evan Fournier, Julius Randle, Mitchell Robinson, Quentin Grimes] over 153 possessions.
Replacement evidence
Kemba Walker · Evan Fournier · Julius Randle · Mitchell Robinson · Quentin Grimes
shrunk net 3.7180 over 153 possessions
on floor 1094 possessions · off floor 5821 possessions
NYK did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on Derrick Rose.
Replacement evidence
Reggie Bullock · Elfrid Payton · Julius Randle · Mitchell Robinson · RJ Barrett
shrunk net 2.3340 over 712 possessions
on floor 1919 possessions · off floor 4621 possessions
DET did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on Derrick Rose.
Replacement evidence
Blake Griffin · Wayne Ellington · Mason Plumlee · Jerami Grant · Delon Wright
shrunk net -2.1500 over 328 possessions
on floor 617 possessions · off floor 5571 possessions
DET did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on Derrick Rose.
Replacement evidence
Blake Griffin · Andre Drummond · Tony Snell · Luke Kennard · Bruce Brown
shrunk net 7.5080 over 203 possessions
on floor 2334 possessions · off floor 3278 possessions
MIN lineups performed 3.0 points per 100 possessions better with Derrick Rose than without him. The best supported alternative was [Jeff Teague, Taj Gibson, Andrew Wiggins, Karl-Anthony Towns, Josh Okogie] over 236 possessions.
Replacement evidence
Jeff Teague · Taj Gibson · Andrew Wiggins · Karl-Anthony Towns · Josh Okogie
shrunk net 3.3540 over 236 possessions
on floor 2624 possessions · off floor 4803 possessions
MIN did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on Derrick Rose.
Replacement evidence
Taj Gibson · Jimmy Butler III · Andrew Wiggins · Tyus Jones · Karl-Anthony Towns
shrunk net 9.0790 over 458 possessions
on floor 402 possessions · off floor 7059 possessions
CLE did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on Derrick Rose.
Replacement evidence
LeBron James · JR Smith · Jose Calderon · Kevin Love · Jae Crowder
shrunk net 4.3840 over 653 possessions
on floor 593 possessions · off floor 8423 possessions
NYK did not have strong functional backup for Derrick Rose in creation; removing him cost about 25.7% of the team's production in that area. The next observed option was Carmelo Anthony.
Replacement evidence
Carmelo Anthony · Joakim Noah · Courtney Lee · Brandon Jennings · Kristaps Porzingis
shrunk net -2.9730 over 202 possessions
on floor 3761 possessions · off floor 3305 possessions
CHI did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on Derrick Rose.
Replacement evidence
No replacement lineup is supported by the available evidence.
on floor 3815 possessions · off floor 3289 possessions
CHI did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on Derrick Rose.
Replacement evidence
Pau Gasol · Mike Dunleavy · Aaron Brooks · Taj Gibson · Jimmy Butler III
shrunk net 1.3620 over 170 possessions
on floor 3444 possessions · off floor 4349 possessions
CHI did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on Derrick Rose.
Replacement evidence
Mike Dunleavy · Kirk Hinrich · Joakim Noah · Taj Gibson · Jimmy Butler III
shrunk net 5.8920 over 214 possessions
on floor 500 possessions · off floor 6568 possessions
Known contract calendar
Governed contract events naming this player — dates carry their honest quality.Derrick Rose has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2024 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. The player is inside the two-season extension-review horizon, but exact eligibility and value are not certified.
Derrick Rose has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2021 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. The player is inside the two-season extension-review horizon, but exact eligibility and value are not certified.
Derrick Rose has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2019 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. The player is inside the two-season extension-review horizon, but exact eligibility and value are not certified.
Function scores, roles, dependence records and contract events are separate evidence. No combined player value, trade value or ranking is computed from them, and none of them is a causal impact claim.