Draymond Green
GSW · 2025-26Primary starterHigh evidenceWhat does Draymond Green actually supply on the floor?
Draymond Green's strongest evidenced functions are passing, rim protection, creation; the weakest available areas are interior finishing, rim pressure, rebounding. The profile is tied to GSW for 2025-26.
Function profile
2025-26 — eleven separate readings on a league scale. They are not additive.* limited evidence for that function. A dash means the evidence was insufficient — not a zero. Use the separate function strengths to evaluate role and roster fit; do not treat them as one player-value score. POA or switch conclusions require lineup, matchup, and assignment evidence beyond this profile.
Season by season
Every governed season profile on record.| Season | Team | Role | Evidence | Creation | Rim pressure | Shooting | Passing | Screening | Interior finish | Point of attack | Switch coverage | Rim protection | Event creation | Rebounding |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | GSW | Primary starter | High evidence | 66 | 45 | 46 | 75 | — | 35 | — | — | 67 | 52 | 46 |
| 2024-25 | GSW | — | High evidence | 67 | 43 | 42 | 82 | 43 | 46 | 69 | 70 | 68 | 77 | 49 |
| 2023-24 | GSW | — | High evidence | 69 | 49 | 67 | 79 | 47 | 48 | 63 | 66 | 68 | 63 | 66 |
| 2022-23 | GSW | — | High evidence | 67 | 48 | 44 | 86 | 55 | 52 | 60 | 65 | 75 | 61 | 56 |
| 2021-22 | GSW | — | High evidence | 73 | 52 | 43 | 83 | 48 | 48 | 42 | 45 | 69 | 75 | 52 |
| 2020-21 | GSW | — | High evidence | 76 | 45 | 37 | 90 | 56 | 43 | 48 | 54 | 73 | 80 | 48 |
| 2019-20 | GSW | — | High evidence | 76 | 51 | 39 | 80 | — | 52 | — | — | 70 | 78 | 49 |
| 2018-19 | GSW | — | High evidence | 81 | 43 | 36 | 82 | — | 48 | — | — | 74 | 81 | 50 |
| 2017-18 | GSW | — | High evidence | 82 | 57 | 39 | 86 | — | 56 | — | — | 75 | 78 | 57 |
| 2016-17 | GSW | — | High evidence | 82 | 52 | 40 | 86 | — | 56 | — | — | 83 | 90 | 69 |
| 2015-16 | GSW | — | Limited evidence | 82 | 57 | 70 | 86 | — | — | — | — | 76 | 77 | — |
| 2014-15 | GSW | — | Limited evidence | 61 | 49 | 52 | 66 | — | — | — | — | 75 | 83 | — |
| 2013-14 | GSW | — | Limited evidence | 56 | 45 | 50 | 58 | — | — | — | — | 70 | 86 | — |
What teams depended on him for
Seasons where a team's situation report named him a dependency case.GSW did not have a sufficiently supported observed replacement lineup for Draymond Green. The database keeps the functional-loss evidence but does not invent a replacement plan.
Replacement evidence
No replacement lineup is supported by the available evidence.
on floor 3502 possessions · off floor 3752 possessions
GSW did not have a sufficiently supported observed replacement lineup for Draymond Green. The database keeps the functional-loss evidence but does not invent a replacement plan.
Replacement evidence
No replacement lineup is supported by the available evidence.
on floor 4375 possessions · off floor 3835 possessions
GSW lineups performed 3.4 points per 100 possessions better with Draymond Green than without him. The best supported alternative was [Chris Paul, Stephen Curry, Klay Thompson, Andrew Wiggins, Kevon Looney] over 168 possessions.
Replacement evidence
Chris Paul · Stephen Curry · Klay Thompson · Andrew Wiggins · Kevon Looney
shrunk net 4.9520 over 168 possessions
on floor 2892 possessions · off floor 4440 possessions
GSW lineups performed 8.6 points per 100 possessions better with Draymond Green than without him. The best supported alternative was [Klay Thompson, Kevon Looney, Donte DiVincenzo, Jordan Poole, Jonathan Kuminga] over 170 possessions.
Replacement evidence
Klay Thompson · Kevon Looney · Donte DiVincenzo · Jordan Poole · Jonathan Kuminga
shrunk net 2.7770 over 170 possessions
on floor 5093 possessions · off floor 3531 possessions
GSW had a supported lineup path without Draymond Green: [Stephen Curry, Otto Porter Jr., Andrew Wiggins, Kevon Looney, Jordan Poole] at 8.0 adjusted net points per 100 possessions over 165 possessions. This is an observed option, not proof it is universally better.
Replacement evidence
Stephen Curry · Otto Porter Jr. · Andrew Wiggins · Kevon Looney · Jordan Poole
shrunk net 7.9560 over 165 possessions
on floor 3749 possessions · off floor 5262 possessions
GSW was highly dependent on Draymond Green. Removing him cost about 34.5% of passing production, and lineups with him performed 9.6 points per 100 possessions better than lineups without him. The best supported replacement group was [Brad Wanamaker, Kent Bazemore, Andrew Wiggins, Damion Lee, Eric Paschall] over 176 possessions.
Replacement evidence
Brad Wanamaker · Kent Bazemore · Andrew Wiggins · Damion Lee · Eric Paschall
shrunk net 1.0030 over 176 possessions
on floor 3967 possessions · off floor 2801 possessions
GSW did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on Draymond Green.
Replacement evidence
No replacement lineup is supported by the available evidence.
on floor 2328 possessions · off floor 3562 possessions
GSW lineups performed 9.4 points per 100 possessions better with Draymond Green than without him. The best supported alternative was [Andre Iguodala, Kevin Durant, Stephen Curry, Klay Thompson, Kevon Looney] over 274 possessions.
Replacement evidence
Andre Iguodala · Kevin Durant · Stephen Curry · Klay Thompson · Kevon Looney
shrunk net 2.0240 over 274 possessions
on floor 5505 possessions · off floor 3895 possessions
GSW did not have a sufficiently supported observed replacement lineup for Draymond Green. The database keeps the functional-loss evidence but does not invent a replacement plan.
Replacement evidence
No replacement lineup is supported by the available evidence.
on floor 5846 possessions · off floor 3330 possessions
GSW was highly dependent on Draymond Green. Removing him cost about 26.5% of event creation production, and lineups with him performed 10.8 points per 100 possessions better than lineups without him. The best supported replacement group was [David West, Shaun Livingston, Andre Iguodala, Kevin Durant, Klay Thompson] over 309 possessions.
Replacement evidence
David West · Shaun Livingston · Andre Iguodala · Kevin Durant · Klay Thompson
shrunk net 5.4240 over 309 possessions
on floor 5786 possessions · off floor 3108 possessions
GSW did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on Draymond Green.
Replacement evidence
Leandro Barbosa · Shaun Livingston · Andre Iguodala · Marreese Speights · Harrison Barnes
shrunk net -2.3880 over 211 possessions
on floor 6892 possessions · off floor 2595 possessions
GSW did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on Draymond Green.
Replacement evidence
Leandro Barbosa · Shaun Livingston · Andre Iguodala · Marreese Speights · Harrison Barnes
shrunk net -0.1480 over 186 possessions
on floor 5934 possessions · off floor 3018 possessions
GSW did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on Draymond Green.
Replacement evidence
Andre Iguodala · Andrew Bogut · David Lee · Stephen Curry · Klay Thompson
shrunk net 11.6350 over 1539 possessions
on floor 3544 possessions · off floor 4122 possessions
Known contract calendar
Governed contract events naming this player — dates carry their honest quality.Draymond Green has a reported player option for the 2027 season at a reported $27,678,571. Player controls the option. The stored date is the CBA outside date; the contract may require an earlier decision.
Draymond Green has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2027 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. The player is inside the two-season extension-review horizon, but exact eligibility and value are not certified.
Draymond Green has a reported player option for the 2027 season at a reported $27,678,571. Player controls the option. The stored date is the CBA outside date; the contract may require an earlier decision.
Draymond Green has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2027 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. The player is inside the two-season extension-review horizon, but exact eligibility and value are not certified.
Draymond Green has a reported player option for the 2027 season at a reported $27,678,571. Player controls the option. The stored date is the CBA outside date; the contract may require an earlier decision.
Draymond Green has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2027 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. No extension-review trigger is applied yet.
Draymond Green has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2020 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. The player is inside the two-season extension-review horizon, but exact eligibility and value are not certified.
Draymond Green has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2020 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. The player is inside the two-season extension-review horizon, but exact eligibility and value are not certified.
Draymond Green has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2020 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. The player is inside the two-season extension-review horizon, but exact eligibility and value are not certified.
Draymond Green has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2020 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. No extension-review trigger is applied yet.
Function scores, roles, dependence records and contract events are separate evidence. No combined player value, trade value or ranking is computed from them, and none of them is a causal impact claim.