Dyson Daniels
ATL · 2025-26Primary starterHigh evidenceWhat does Dyson Daniels actually supply on the floor?
Dyson Daniels's strongest evidenced functions are passing, event creation, creation; the weakest available areas are shooting, interior finishing, rim protection. The profile is tied to ATL for 2025-26.
Function profile
2025-26 — eleven separate readings on a league scale. They are not additive.* limited evidence for that function. A dash means the evidence was insufficient — not a zero. Use the separate function strengths to evaluate role and roster fit; do not treat them as one player-value score. POA or switch conclusions require lineup, matchup, and assignment evidence beyond this profile.
Season by season
Every governed season profile on record.| Season | Team | Role | Evidence | Creation | Rim pressure | Shooting | Passing | Screening | Interior finish | Point of attack | Switch coverage | Rim protection | Event creation | Rebounding |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | ATL | Primary starter | High evidence | 76 | 58 | 24 | 81 | — | 40 | — | — | 46 | 76 | 64 |
| 2024-25 | ATL | — | High evidence | 60 | 59 | 41 | 62 | 42 | 43 | 50 | 58 | 56 | 83 | 56 |
| 2023-24 | NOP | — | High evidence | 61 | 48 | 41 | 67 | — | 47 | 56 | 56 | 58 | 77 | 53 |
| 2022-23 | NOP | — | High evidence | 58 | 45 | 42 | 67 | — | 41 | 61 | 57 | 49 | 63 | 49 |
What teams depended on him for
Seasons where a team's situation report named him a dependency case.ATL did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on Dyson Daniels.
Replacement evidence
No replacement lineup is supported by the available evidence.
on floor 5017 possessions · off floor 2895 possessions
ATL did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on Dyson Daniels.
Replacement evidence
No replacement lineup is supported by the available evidence.
on floor 5033 possessions · off floor 2642 possessions
NOP had a supported lineup path without Dyson Daniels: [CJ McCollum, Larry Nance Jr., Brandon Ingram, Herbert Jones, Trey Murphy III] at 4.2 adjusted net points per 100 possessions over 199 possessions. This is an observed option, not proof it is universally better.
Replacement evidence
CJ McCollum · Larry Nance Jr. · Brandon Ingram · Herbert Jones · Trey Murphy III
shrunk net 4.2040 over 199 possessions
on floor 2487 possessions · off floor 5129 possessions
NOP had a supported lineup path without Dyson Daniels: [Jonas Valanciunas, CJ McCollum, Josh Richardson, Naji Marshall, Trey Murphy III] at 3.8 adjusted net points per 100 possessions over 173 possessions. This is an observed option, not proof it is universally better.
Replacement evidence
Jonas Valanciunas · CJ McCollum · Josh Richardson · Naji Marshall · Trey Murphy III
shrunk net 3.8160 over 173 possessions
on floor 1915 possessions · off floor 5403 possessions
Known contract calendar
Governed contract events naming this player — dates carry their honest quality.Dyson Daniels has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2026 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. The player is inside the two-season extension-review horizon, but exact eligibility and value are not certified.
Dyson Daniels has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2026 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. The player is inside the two-season extension-review horizon, but exact eligibility and value are not certified.
Dyson Daniels has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2026 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. The player is inside the two-season extension-review horizon, but exact eligibility and value are not certified.
Dyson Daniels has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2026 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. No extension-review trigger is applied yet.
Function scores, roles, dependence records and contract events are separate evidence. No combined player value, trade value or ranking is computed from them, and none of them is a causal impact claim.