← Player Board
Gary Harris
Player Dossier

Gary Harris

MIL · 2025-26Emergency depthMixed coverage
Spot-up spacer · Chaser · Point-of-attack defender

What does Gary Harris actually supply on the floor?

Gary Harris's strongest evidenced functions are event creation, shooting, rebounding; the weakest available areas are interior finishing, rim pressure, rim protection. The profile is tied to MIL for 2025-26.

Function profile

2025-26 — eleven separate readings on a league scale. They are not additive.
Creation48
Rim pressure34
Shooting*57
Passing49
Screening*
Interior finish22
Point of attack*
Switch coverage*
Rim protection43
Event creation63
Rebounding50

* limited evidence for that function. A dash means the evidence was insufficient — not a zero. Use the separate function strengths to evaluate role and roster fit; do not treat them as one player-value score. POA or switch conclusions require lineup, matchup, and assignment evidence beyond this profile.

Season by season

Every governed season profile on record.
SeasonTeamRoleEvidenceCreationRim pressureShootingPassingScreeningInterior finishPoint of attackSwitch coverageRim protectionEvent creationRebounding
2025-26MILEmergency depthMixed coverage4834574922436350
2024-25ORLMixed coverage39305441276157475948
2023-24ORLMixed coverage4344565347364644356140
2022-23ORLMixed coverage33347131335552386049
2021-22ORLMixed coverage47446854354346345340
2020-21Mixed coverage6147516127364145
2019-20DENHigh evidence5545465620366552
2018-19DENHigh evidence5952505728415840
2017-18DENHigh evidence6259726434307151
2016-17DENHigh evidence5962776164326046
2015-16DENLimited evidence575858633563
2014-15DENLimited evidence515337534570

What teams depended on him for

Seasons where a team's situation report named him a dependency case.
MIL · 2025-26Observed replacement lineup exists

MIL had a supported lineup path without Gary Harris: [Giannis Antetokounmpo, Myles Turner, Kyle Kuzma, Ryan Rollins, AJ Green] at 9.4 adjusted net points per 100 possessions over 180 possessions. This is an observed option, not proof it is universally better.

rotation 17%loses 7.8% of event creation
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without him

Giannis Antetokounmpo · Myles Turner · Kyle Kuzma · Ryan Rollins · AJ Green

shrunk net 9.4020 over 180 possessions

on floor 1130 possessions · off floor 5922 possessions

ORL · 2024-25Lineup performance dependence

ORL lineups performed 3.3 points per 100 possessions better with Gary Harris than without him. The best supported alternative was [Kentavious Caldwell-Pope, Wendell Carter Jr., Cole Anthony, Franz Wagner, Paolo Banchero] over 352 possessions.

rotation 19%loses 3.8% of event creation
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without him

Kentavious Caldwell-Pope · Wendell Carter Jr. · Cole Anthony · Franz Wagner · Paolo Banchero

shrunk net 2.4740 over 352 possessions

on floor 1410 possessions · off floor 6075 possessions

ORL · 2023-24Observed replacement lineup exists

ORL had a supported lineup path without Gary Harris: [Goga Bitadze, Franz Wagner, Jalen Suggs, Paolo Banchero, Anthony Black] at 5.9 adjusted net points per 100 possessions over 548 possessions. This is an observed option, not proof it is universally better.

rotation 34%loses 8.3% of event creation
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without him

Goga Bitadze · Franz Wagner · Jalen Suggs · Paolo Banchero · Anthony Black

shrunk net 5.9030 over 548 possessions

on floor 2623 possessions · off floor 5130 possessions

ORL · 2022-23Observed replacement lineup exists

ORL had a supported lineup path without Gary Harris: [Moritz Wagner, Bol Bol, Cole Anthony, Franz Wagner, Jalen Suggs] at 1.6 adjusted net points per 100 possessions over 257 possessions. This is an observed option, not proof it is universally better.

rotation 30%loses 22.9% of shooting
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without him

Moritz Wagner · Bol Bol · Cole Anthony · Franz Wagner · Jalen Suggs

shrunk net 1.5850 over 257 possessions

on floor 2194 possessions · off floor 5118 possessions

ORL · 2021-22Lineup performance dependence

ORL lineups performed 3.6 points per 100 possessions better with Gary Harris than without him. The best supported alternative was [Mo Bamba, Wendell Carter Jr., Cole Anthony, Franz Wagner, Jalen Suggs] over 810 possessions.

rotation 44%loses 27.7% of shooting
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without him

Mo Bamba · Wendell Carter Jr. · Cole Anthony · Franz Wagner · Jalen Suggs

shrunk net -0.9820 over 810 possessions

on floor 3191 possessions · off floor 4156 possessions

DEN · 2020-21Player function-loss evidence unavailable

DEN did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on Gary Harris.

Replacement evidence
Best observed five without him

Will Barton · Nikola Jokic · Jamal Murray · Monte Morris · Michael Porter Jr.

shrunk net 7.6660 over 286 possessions

on floor 1025 possessions · off floor 6120 possessions

DEN · 2019-20Lineup performance dependence

DEN lineups performed 3.8 points per 100 possessions better with Gary Harris than without him. The best supported alternative was [Will Barton, Jerami Grant, Nikola Jokic, Monte Morris, Torrey Craig] over 253 possessions.

rotation 49%loses 13.6% of event creation
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without him

Will Barton · Jerami Grant · Nikola Jokic · Monte Morris · Torrey Craig

shrunk net -4.7980 over 253 possessions

on floor 3768 possessions · off floor 3850 possessions

DEN · 2018-19Observed replacement lineup exists

DEN had a supported lineup path without Gary Harris: [Paul Millsap, Nikola Jokic, Malik Beasley, Jamal Murray, Torrey Craig] at 7.0 adjusted net points per 100 possessions over 260 possessions. This is an observed option, not proof it is universally better.

rotation 46%loses 9.8% of event creation
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without him

Paul Millsap · Nikola Jokic · Malik Beasley · Jamal Murray · Torrey Craig

shrunk net 6.9820 over 260 possessions

on floor 3840 possessions · off floor 4484 possessions

DEN · 2017-18Lineup performance dependence

DEN lineups performed 5.0 points per 100 possessions better with Gary Harris than without him. The best supported alternative was [Paul Millsap, Wilson Chandler, Will Barton, Nikola Jokic, Jamal Murray] over 547 possessions.

rotation 58%loses 23.3% of event creation
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without him

Paul Millsap · Wilson Chandler · Will Barton · Nikola Jokic · Jamal Murray

shrunk net 3.6910 over 547 possessions

on floor 4178 possessions · off floor 2943 possessions

DEN · 2016-17No supported replacement lineup sample

DEN did not have a sufficiently supported observed replacement lineup for Gary Harris. The database keeps the functional-loss evidence but does not invent a replacement plan.

rotation 45%loses 24.2% of shooting
Replacement evidence

No replacement lineup is supported by the available evidence.

on floor 3321 possessions · off floor 3992 possessions

DEN · 2015-16Player function-loss evidence unavailable

DEN did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on Gary Harris.

Replacement evidence

No replacement lineup is supported by the available evidence.

on floor 4407 possessions · off floor 2682 possessions

DEN · 2014-15Player function-loss evidence unavailable

DEN did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on Gary Harris.

Replacement evidence
Best observed five without him

Randy Foye · Wilson Chandler · Danilo Gallinari · Ty Lawson · Kenneth Faried

shrunk net 2.3200 over 499 possessions

on floor 1277 possessions · off floor 5760 possessions

Known contract calendar

Governed contract events naming this player — dates carry their honest quality.
ORL · 2024-25Team option decisionJun 29, 2025Outside date, not a contract deadlinereported $7.50M

Gary Harris has a reported team option for the 2026 season at a reported $7,500,000. Team controls the option. The stored date is the CBA outside date; the contract may require an earlier decision.

ORL · 2024-25Contract control horizonJun 30, 2026

Gary Harris has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2026 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. The player is inside the two-season extension-review horizon, but exact eligibility and value are not certified.

ORL · 2023-24Contract control horizonJun 30, 2024

Gary Harris has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2024 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. The player is inside the two-season extension-review horizon, but exact eligibility and value are not certified.

ORL · 2022-23Contract control horizonJun 30, 2024

Gary Harris has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2024 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. The player is inside the two-season extension-review horizon, but exact eligibility and value are not certified.

ORL · 2021-22Contract control horizonJun 30, 2022

Gary Harris has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2022 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. The player is inside the two-season extension-review horizon, but exact eligibility and value are not certified.

DEN · 2019-20Contract control horizonJun 30, 2022

Gary Harris has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2022 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. The player is inside the two-season extension-review horizon, but exact eligibility and value are not certified.

DEN · 2018-19Contract control horizonJun 30, 2022

Gary Harris has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2022 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. No extension-review trigger is applied yet.

Function scores, roles, dependence records and contract events are separate evidence. No combined player value, trade value or ranking is computed from them, and none of them is a causal impact claim.