George Hill
What does George Hill actually supply on the floor?
George Hill's strongest evidenced functions are passing, creation, shooting; the weakest available areas are interior finishing, rebounding, rim protection. These are full-season values across multiple teams, so team-specific fit is withheld.
Function profile
2022-23 — eleven separate readings on a league scale. They are not additive.* limited evidence for that function. A dash means the evidence was insufficient — not a zero. Use the separate function strengths to evaluate role and roster fit; do not treat them as one player-value score. POA or switch conclusions require lineup, matchup, and assignment evidence beyond this profile.
Season by season
Every governed season profile on record.| Season | Team | Role | Evidence | Creation | Rim pressure | Shooting | Passing | Screening | Interior finish | Point of attack | Switch coverage | Rim protection | Event creation | Rebounding |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-23 | — | — | Mixed coverage | 59 | 43 | 52 | 62 | — | 20 | — | — | 39 | 51 | 35 |
| 2021-22 | MIL | — | High evidence | 56 | 52 | 40 | 59 | — | 59 | 44 | 48 | 35 | 53 | 39 |
| 2020-21 | — | — | Mixed coverage | 54 | 53 | 58 | 54 | — | 31 | — | — | 39 | 54 | 45 |
| 2019-20 | MIL | — | High evidence | 58 | 56 | 74 | 59 | — | 37 | — | — | 39 | 53 | 59 |
| 2018-19 | — | — | High evidence | 62 | 56 | 42 | 61 | — | 44 | — | — | 35 | 61 | 38 |
| 2017-18 | — | — | High evidence | 60 | 49 | 72 | 60 | — | 43 | — | — | 43 | 61 | 44 |
| 2016-17 | UTA | — | High evidence | 58 | 66 | 74 | 59 | — | 69 | — | — | 35 | 55 | 36 |
| 2015-16 | IND | — | Limited evidence | 66 | 52 | 77 | 66 | — | — | — | — | 33 | 51 | — |
| 2014-15 | IND | — | Limited evidence | 82 | 67 | 60 | 79 | — | — | — | — | 53 | 59 | — |
| 2013-14 | IND | — | Limited evidence | 66 | 69 | 62 | 67 | — | — | — | — | 43 | 54 | — |
What teams depended on him for
Seasons where a team's situation report named him a dependency case.IND did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on George Hill.
Replacement evidence
Myles Turner · Buddy Hield · Andrew Nembhard · Tyrese Haliburton · Bennedict Mathurin
shrunk net 3.6690 over 203 possessions
on floor 321 possessions · off floor 7000 possessions
MIL did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on George Hill.
Replacement evidence
Brook Lopez · Jrue Holiday · Giannis Antetokounmpo · Grayson Allen · Jevon Carter
shrunk net 5.2220 over 362 possessions
on floor 1135 possessions · off floor 6510 possessions
MIL lineups performed 7.0 points per 100 possessions better with George Hill than without him. The best supported alternative was [Jrue Holiday, Khris Middleton, Giannis Antetokounmpo, Bobby Portis, Grayson Allen] over 673 possessions.
Replacement evidence
Jrue Holiday · Khris Middleton · Giannis Antetokounmpo · Bobby Portis · Grayson Allen
shrunk net 3.5760 over 673 possessions
on floor 2340 possessions · off floor 5821 possessions
OKC did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on George Hill.
Replacement evidence
Darius Bazley · Moses Brown · Luguentz Dort · Theo Maledon · Aleksej Pokusevski
shrunk net -3.3770 over 151 possessions
on floor 694 possessions · off floor 5826 possessions
PHI did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on George Hill.
Replacement evidence
Danny Green · Tobias Harris · Seth Curry · Joel Embiid · Ben Simmons
shrunk net 11.0980 over 1427 possessions
on floor 894 possessions · off floor 6450 possessions
MIL had a supported lineup path without George Hill: [Brook Lopez, Wesley Matthews, Eric Bledsoe, Khris Middleton, Giannis Antetokounmpo] at 11.8 adjusted net points per 100 possessions over 1060 possessions. This is an observed option, not proof it is universally better.
Replacement evidence
Brook Lopez · Wesley Matthews · Eric Bledsoe · Khris Middleton · Giannis Antetokounmpo
shrunk net 11.7860 over 1060 possessions
on floor 2678 possessions · off floor 4742 possessions
CLE did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on George Hill.
Replacement evidence
Kevin Love · Brandon Knight · Cedi Osman · Ante Zizic · Collin Sexton
shrunk net -1.3940 over 251 possessions
on floor 598 possessions · off floor 6548 possessions
MIL did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on George Hill.
Replacement evidence
Brook Lopez · Eric Bledsoe · Khris Middleton · Giannis Antetokounmpo · Malcolm Brogdon
shrunk net 6.6980 over 1292 possessions
on floor 2423 possessions · off floor 6393 possessions
CLE did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on George Hill.
Replacement evidence
LeBron James · JR Smith · Jose Calderon · Kevin Love · Jae Crowder
shrunk net 4.3840 over 653 possessions
on floor 2182 possessions · off floor 6834 possessions
SAC did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on George Hill.
Replacement evidence
Kosta Koufos · Bogdan Bogdanovic · Willie Cauley-Stein · Buddy Hield · Frank Mason III
shrunk net 1.8030 over 162 possessions
on floor 2011 possessions · off floor 5019 possessions
UTA lineups performed 6.6 points per 100 possessions better with George Hill than without him. The best supported alternative was [Boris Diaw, Gordon Hayward, Rudy Gobert, Rodney Hood, Dante Exum] over 216 possessions.
Replacement evidence
Boris Diaw · Gordon Hayward · Rudy Gobert · Rodney Hood · Dante Exum
shrunk net 5.9880 over 216 possessions
on floor 3073 possessions · off floor 4435 possessions
IND did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on George Hill.
Replacement evidence
No replacement lineup is supported by the available evidence.
on floor 4974 possessions · off floor 2804 possessions
IND did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on George Hill.
Replacement evidence
Luis Scola · Roy Hibbert · Donald Sloan · Chris Copeland · Solomon Hill
shrunk net -0.2380 over 230 possessions
on floor 2148 possessions · off floor 4691 possessions
IND did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on George Hill.
Replacement evidence
Luis Scola · Danny Granger · Ian Mahinmi · C.J. Watson · Lance Stephenson
shrunk net 0.5790 over 351 possessions
on floor 5230 possessions · off floor 3001 possessions
Known contract calendar
Governed contract events naming this player — dates carry their honest quality.No governed contract-calendar events name this player.
Function scores, roles, dependence records and contract events are separate evidence. No combined player value, trade value or ranking is computed from them, and none of them is a causal impact claim.