Goran Dragic
What does Goran Dragic actually supply on the floor?
Goran Dragic's strongest evidenced functions are passing, creation, shooting; the weakest available areas are event creation, rim protection, rebounding. These are full-season values across multiple teams, so team-specific fit is withheld.
Function profile
2022-23 — eleven separate readings on a league scale. They are not additive.* limited evidence for that function. A dash means the evidence was insufficient — not a zero. Use the separate function strengths to evaluate role and roster fit; do not treat them as one player-value score. POA or switch conclusions require lineup, matchup, and assignment evidence beyond this profile.
Season by season
Every governed season profile on record.| Season | Team | Role | Evidence | Creation | Rim pressure | Shooting | Passing | Screening | Interior finish | Point of attack | Switch coverage | Rim protection | Event creation | Rebounding |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-23 | — | — | Mixed coverage | 65 | 45 | 52 | 69 | — | 49 | — | — | 33 | 20 | 38 |
| 2021-22 | — | — | Mixed coverage | 59 | 49 | 42 | 57 | — | 44 | — | — | 40 | 57 | 53 |
| 2020-21 | MIA | — | High evidence | 73 | 50 | 59 | 76 | — | 43 | 50 | 48 | 44 | 37 | 36 |
| 2019-20 | MIA | — | High evidence | 74 | 56 | 62 | 75 | — | 52 | — | — | 29 | 33 | 36 |
| 2018-19 | MIA | — | Mixed coverage | 66 | 48 | 55 | 68 | — | 45 | — | — | 45 | 45 | 31 |
| 2017-18 | MIA | — | High evidence | 77 | 57 | 63 | 74 | — | 51 | — | — | 39 | 38 | 29 |
| 2016-17 | MIA | — | High evidence | 81 | 57 | 75 | 79 | — | 33 | — | — | 43 | 57 | 24 |
| 2015-16 | MIA | — | Limited evidence | 85 | 69 | 44 | 83 | — | — | — | — | 35 | 47 | — |
| 2014-15 | — | — | Limited evidence | 80 | 71 | 58 | 77 | — | — | — | — | 34 | 42 | — |
| 2013-14 | PHX | — | Limited evidence | 88 | 78 | 76 | 83 | — | — | — | — | 44 | 62 | — |
What teams depended on him for
Seasons where a team's situation report named him a dependency case.CHI did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on Goran Dragic.
Replacement evidence
DeMar DeRozan · Andre Drummond · Coby White · Patrick Williams · Ayo Dosunmu
shrunk net 5.1920 over 242 possessions
on floor 1462 possessions · off floor 5999 possessions
MIL did not have enough resolved lineup possessions involving Goran Dragic for a dependable replacement conclusion.
Replacement evidence
Brook Lopez · Jrue Holiday · Giannis Antetokounmpo · Grayson Allen · Jevon Carter
shrunk net 5.2220 over 362 possessions
on floor 158 possessions · off floor 7487 possessions
BRK did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on Goran Dragic.
Replacement evidence
Kevin Durant · Blake Griffin · James Harden · Joe Harris · Bruce Brown
shrunk net 3.0870 over 341 possessions
on floor 912 possessions · off floor 6570 possessions
TOR did not have enough resolved lineup possessions involving Goran Dragic for a dependable replacement conclusion.
Replacement evidence
Pascal Siakam · Fred VanVleet · Gary Trent Jr. · Precious Achiuwa · Scottie Barnes
shrunk net 6.3760 over 274 possessions
on floor 165 possessions · off floor 7370 possessions
MIA had a supported lineup path without Goran Dragic: [Jimmy Butler III, Kelly Olynyk, Bam Adebayo, Duncan Robinson, Tyler Herro] at 4.1 adjusted net points per 100 possessions over 187 possessions. This is an observed option, not proof it is universally better.
Replacement evidence
Jimmy Butler III · Kelly Olynyk · Bam Adebayo · Duncan Robinson · Tyler Herro
shrunk net 4.0900 over 187 possessions
on floor 2522 possessions · off floor 3994 possessions
MIA lineups performed 4.1 points per 100 possessions better with Goran Dragic than without him. The best supported alternative was [Jimmy Butler III, Meyers Leonard, Bam Adebayo, Duncan Robinson, Kendrick Nunn] over 908 possessions.
Replacement evidence
Jimmy Butler III · Meyers Leonard · Bam Adebayo · Duncan Robinson · Kendrick Nunn
shrunk net 7.7080 over 908 possessions
on floor 3603 possessions · off floor 4048 possessions
MIA had a supported lineup path without Goran Dragic: [Dion Waiters, Kelly Olynyk, Justise Winslow, Josh Richardson, Bam Adebayo] at 5.1 adjusted net points per 100 possessions over 225 possessions. This is an observed option, not proof it is universally better.
Replacement evidence
Dion Waiters · Kelly Olynyk · Justise Winslow · Josh Richardson · Bam Adebayo
shrunk net 5.1340 over 225 possessions
on floor 1866 possessions · off floor 5341 possessions
MIA had a supported lineup path without Goran Dragic: [Wayne Ellington, Kelly Olynyk, Justise Winslow, Josh Richardson, Bam Adebayo] at 7.1 adjusted net points per 100 possessions over 262 possessions. This is an observed option, not proof it is universally better.
Replacement evidence
Wayne Ellington · Kelly Olynyk · Justise Winslow · Josh Richardson · Bam Adebayo
shrunk net 7.0870 over 262 possessions
on floor 4498 possessions · off floor 2982 possessions
MIA did not have strong functional backup for Goran Dragic in creation; removing him cost about 28.5% of the team's production in that area. The next observed option was James Johnson.
Replacement evidence
James Johnson · Wayne Ellington · Willie Reed · Tyler Johnson · Josh Richardson
shrunk net 0.4380 over 184 possessions
on floor 4383 possessions · off floor 2592 possessions
MIA did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on Goran Dragic.
Replacement evidence
Joe Johnson · Dwyane Wade · Hassan Whiteside · Justise Winslow · Josh Richardson
shrunk net 3.5510 over 183 possessions
on floor 4917 possessions · off floor 3024 possessions
PHX did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on Goran Dragic.
Replacement evidence
P.J. Tucker · Brandan Wright · Eric Bledsoe · Markieff Morris · Marcus Morris Sr.
shrunk net -0.9930 over 216 possessions
on floor 3141 possessions · off floor 3931 possessions
MIA did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on Goran Dragic.
Replacement evidence
Chris Bosh · Luol Deng · Mario Chalmers · Hassan Whiteside · Shabazz Napier
shrunk net -0.1100 over 156 possessions
on floor 1548 possessions · off floor 4995 possessions
PHX did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on Goran Dragic.
Replacement evidence
Channing Frye · Gerald Green · P.J. Tucker · Eric Bledsoe · Miles Plumlee
shrunk net -0.8940 over 186 possessions
on floor 4641 possessions · off floor 2246 possessions
Known contract calendar
Governed contract events naming this player — dates carry their honest quality.Goran Dragic has a reported team option for the 2022 season at a reported $728,742. Team controls the option. The stored date is the CBA outside date; the contract may require an earlier decision.
Goran Dragic has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2022 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. The player is inside the two-season extension-review horizon, but exact eligibility and value are not certified.
Goran Dragic has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2020 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. The player is inside the two-season extension-review horizon, but exact eligibility and value are not certified.
Goran Dragic has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2020 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. The player is inside the two-season extension-review horizon, but exact eligibility and value are not certified.
Goran Dragic has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2020 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. The player is inside the two-season extension-review horizon, but exact eligibility and value are not certified.
Goran Dragic has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2020 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. No extension-review trigger is applied yet.
Function scores, roles, dependence records and contract events are separate evidence. No combined player value, trade value or ranking is computed from them, and none of them is a causal impact claim.