
Ja Morant
What does Ja Morant actually supply on the floor?
Ja Morant's strongest evidenced functions are creation, passing, rim pressure; the weakest available areas are shooting, rebounding, event creation. The profile is tied to MEM for 2025-26.
Function profile
2025-26 — eleven separate readings on a league scale. They are not additive.* limited evidence for that function. A dash means the evidence was insufficient — not a zero. Use the separate function strengths to evaluate role and roster fit; do not treat them as one player-value score. POA or switch conclusions require lineup, matchup, and assignment evidence beyond this profile.
Season by season
Every governed season profile on record.| Season | Team | Role | Evidence | Creation | Rim pressure | Shooting | Passing | Screening | Interior finish | Point of attack | Switch coverage | Rim protection | Event creation | Rebounding |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | MEM | Franchise engine | Mixed coverage | 71 | 57 | 37 | 68 | — | 52 | — | — | 49 | 48 | 48 |
| 2024-25 | MEM | — | High evidence | 83 | 60 | 48 | 84 | — | 52 | 57 | 58 | 36 | 56 | 23 |
| 2023-24 | MEM | — | Mixed coverage | 61 | 64 | 46 | 58 | — | 46 | 39 | 39 | 49 | 40 | 41 |
| 2022-23 | MEM | — | High evidence | 75 | 66 | 45 | 72 | 47 | 49 | 57 | 62 | 45 | 55 | 42 |
| 2021-22 | MEM | — | High evidence | 84 | 70 | 52 | 80 | — | 53 | 50 | 51 | 43 | 58 | 54 |
| 2020-21 | MEM | — | High evidence | 84 | 67 | 44 | 86 | — | 57 | 48 | 44 | 30 | 40 | 40 |
| 2019-20 | MEM | — | High evidence | 89 | 65 | 49 | 87 | — | 42 | — | — | 32 | 41 | 26 |
What teams depended on him for
Seasons where a team's situation report named him a dependency case.MEM did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on Ja Morant.
Replacement evidence
Kentavious Caldwell-Pope · Jock Landale · Santi Aldama · Cam Spencer · Jaylen Wells
shrunk net 3.0510 over 160 possessions
on floor 1074 possessions · off floor 6051 possessions
MEM did not have strong functional backup for Ja Morant in passing; removing him cost about 26.2% of the team's production in that area. The next observed option was Scotty Pippen Jr..
Replacement evidence
Luke Kennard · Jaren Jackson Jr. · Desmond Bane · Zach Edey · Jaylen Wells
shrunk net -1.0500 over 202 possessions
on floor 3176 possessions · off floor 4712 possessions
MEM lineups performed 4.2 points per 100 possessions better with Ja Morant than without him. The best supported alternative was [Tyus Jones, Dillon Brooks, Jaren Jackson Jr., Xavier Tillman, Desmond Bane] over 328 possessions.
Replacement evidence
Tyus Jones · Dillon Brooks · Jaren Jackson Jr. · Xavier Tillman · Desmond Bane
shrunk net 2.4190 over 328 possessions
on floor 4039 possessions · off floor 3927 possessions
MEM did not have strong functional backup for Ja Morant in creation; removing him cost about 28.2% of the team's production in that area. The next observed option was Steven Adams.
Replacement evidence
Steven Adams · Tyus Jones · Dillon Brooks · Jaren Jackson Jr. · Desmond Bane
shrunk net 6.5200 over 457 possessions
on floor 4120 possessions · off floor 4268 possessions
MEM lineups performed 3.3 points per 100 possessions better with Ja Morant than without him. The best supported alternative was [Jonas Valanciunas, Kyle Anderson, Tyus Jones, Dillon Brooks, Brandon Clarke] over 153 possessions.
Replacement evidence
Jonas Valanciunas · Kyle Anderson · Tyus Jones · Dillon Brooks · Brandon Clarke
shrunk net -3.0330 over 153 possessions
on floor 4338 possessions · off floor 2593 possessions
MEM did not have a sufficiently supported observed replacement lineup for Ja Morant. The database keeps the functional-loss evidence but does not invent a replacement plan.
Replacement evidence
No replacement lineup is supported by the available evidence.
on floor 3933 possessions · off floor 2688 possessions
Known contract calendar
Governed contract events naming this player — dates carry their honest quality.Ja Morant has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2028 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. No extension-review trigger is applied yet.
Function scores, roles, dependence records and contract events are separate evidence. No combined player value, trade value or ranking is computed from them, and none of them is a causal impact claim.