
Jaden Ivey
What does Jaden Ivey actually supply on the floor?
Jaden Ivey's strongest evidenced functions are shooting, event creation, rim pressure; the weakest available areas are interior finishing, rebounding, creation. These are full-season values across multiple teams, so team-specific fit is withheld.
Function profile
2025-26 — eleven separate readings on a league scale. They are not additive.* limited evidence for that function. A dash means the evidence was insufficient — not a zero. Use the separate function strengths to evaluate role and roster fit; do not treat them as one player-value score. POA or switch conclusions require lineup, matchup, and assignment evidence beyond this profile.
Season by season
Every governed season profile on record.| Season | Team | Role | Evidence | Creation | Rim pressure | Shooting | Passing | Screening | Interior finish | Point of attack | Switch coverage | Rim protection | Event creation | Rebounding |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | — | Secondary starter | Mixed coverage | 48 | 53 | 58 | 53 | — | 44 | — | — | 52 | 57 | 46 |
| 2024-25 | DET | — | Mixed coverage | 59 | 62 | 67 | 57 | — | 50 | 46 | 40 | 42 | 47 | 40 |
| 2023-24 | DET | — | High evidence | 67 | 58 | 43 | 71 | — | 41 | 42 | 36 | 53 | 41 | 29 |
| 2022-23 | DET | — | High evidence | 80 | 54 | 52 | 86 | — | 43 | 34 | 34 | 29 | 41 | 30 |
What teams depended on him for
Seasons where a team's situation report named him a dependency case.DET did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on Jaden Ivey.
Replacement evidence
Tobias Harris · Duncan Robinson · Jalen Duren · Ausar Thompson · Daniss Jenkins
shrunk net 11.3510 over 381 possessions
on floor 995 possessions · off floor 7212 possessions
CHI did not have enough resolved lineup possessions involving Jaden Ivey for a dependable replacement conclusion.
Replacement evidence
Nikola Vucevic · Coby White · Isaac Okoro · Josh Giddey · Matas Buzelis
shrunk net 0.2440 over 213 possessions
on floor 218 possessions · off floor 7265 possessions
DET had a supported lineup path without Jaden Ivey: [Tobias Harris, Tim Hardaway Jr., Cade Cunningham, Jalen Duren, Ausar Thompson] at 4.2 adjusted net points per 100 possessions over 1109 possessions. This is an observed option, not proof it is universally better.
Replacement evidence
Tobias Harris · Tim Hardaway Jr. · Cade Cunningham · Jalen Duren · Ausar Thompson
shrunk net 4.1690 over 1109 possessions
on floor 1585 possessions · off floor 6076 possessions
DET did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on Jaden Ivey.
Replacement evidence
Killian Hayes · Isaiah Stewart · Cade Cunningham · Jalen Duren · Ausar Thompson
shrunk net -2.4180 over 197 possessions
on floor 4103 possessions · off floor 3092 possessions
DET did not have a sufficiently supported observed replacement lineup for Jaden Ivey. The database keeps the functional-loss evidence but does not invent a replacement plan.
Replacement evidence
No replacement lineup is supported by the available evidence.
on floor 4303 possessions · off floor 3026 possessions
Known contract calendar
Governed contract events naming this player — dates carry their honest quality.Jaden Ivey has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2026 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. The player is inside the two-season extension-review horizon, but exact eligibility and value are not certified.
Jaden Ivey has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2026 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. The player is inside the two-season extension-review horizon, but exact eligibility and value are not certified.
Jaden Ivey has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2026 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. No extension-review trigger is applied yet.
Function scores, roles, dependence records and contract events are separate evidence. No combined player value, trade value or ranking is computed from them, and none of them is a causal impact claim.