← Player Board
Jae'Sean Tate
Player Dossier

Jae'Sean Tate

HOU · 2025-26Emergency depthMixed coverage
Connective passer · Rim-pressure finisher · Matchup big · Switch wing

What does Jae'Sean Tate actually supply on the floor?

Jae'Sean Tate's strongest evidenced functions are interior finishing, rim protection, rim pressure; the weakest available areas are event creation, passing, creation. The profile is tied to HOU for 2025-26.

Function profile

2025-26 — eleven separate readings on a league scale. They are not additive.
Creation40
Rim pressure50
Shooting*47
Passing38
Screening*
Interior finish64
Point of attack*
Switch coverage*
Rim protection52
Event creation36
Rebounding49

* limited evidence for that function. A dash means the evidence was insufficient — not a zero. Use the separate function strengths to evaluate role and roster fit; do not treat them as one player-value score. POA or switch conclusions require lineup, matchup, and assignment evidence beyond this profile.

Season by season

Every governed season profile on record.
SeasonTeamRoleEvidenceCreationRim pressureShootingPassingScreeningInterior finishPoint of attackSwitch coverageRim protectionEvent creationRebounding
2025-26HOUEmergency depthMixed coverage4050473864523649
2024-25HOUMixed coverage55475053495855505846
2023-24HOUHigh evidence52473951494340536642
2022-23HOUMixed coverage6455466446525452505154
2021-22HOUHigh evidence6562396652614548576046
2020-21HOUHigh evidence5860406457654448527141

What teams depended on him for

Seasons where a team's situation report named him a dependency case.
HOU · 2025-26Observed replacement lineup exists

HOU had a supported lineup path without Jae'Sean Tate: [Kevin Durant, Alperen Sengun, Jabari Smith Jr., Tari Eason, Amen Thompson] at 6.2 adjusted net points per 100 possessions over 547 possessions. This is an observed option, not proof it is universally better.

rotation 10%loses 2.6% of interior finish
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without him

Kevin Durant · Alperen Sengun · Jabari Smith Jr. · Tari Eason · Amen Thompson

shrunk net 6.2490 over 547 possessions

on floor 734 possessions · off floor 6701 possessions

HOU · 2024-25Observed replacement lineup exists

HOU had a supported lineup path without Jae'Sean Tate: [Dillon Brooks, Jalen Green, Alperen Sengun, Tari Eason, Amen Thompson] at 7.9 adjusted net points per 100 possessions over 287 possessions. This is an observed option, not proof it is universally better.

rotation 14%loses 3.3% of event creation
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without him

Dillon Brooks · Jalen Green · Alperen Sengun · Tari Eason · Amen Thompson

shrunk net 7.8910 over 287 possessions

on floor 1059 possessions · off floor 6679 possessions

HOU · 2023-24Lineup performance dependence

HOU lineups performed 4.3 points per 100 possessions better with Jae'Sean Tate than without him. The best supported alternative was [Fred VanVleet, Dillon Brooks, Jalen Green, Jabari Smith Jr., Amen Thompson] over 330 possessions.

rotation 26%loses 9.4% of event creation
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without him

Fred VanVleet · Dillon Brooks · Jalen Green · Jabari Smith Jr. · Amen Thompson

shrunk net 1.1560 over 330 possessions

on floor 1872 possessions · off floor 5330 possessions

HOU · 2022-23Replacement lineup exists, with a performance cost

HOU had an observed replacement lineup for Jae'Sean Tate, but it came with a performance cost. The supported alternative was [Kevin Porter Jr., Jalen Green, Kenyon Martin Jr., Usman Garuba, Tari Eason] at -2.5 adjusted net points per 100 possessions over 165 possessions.

rotation 17%loses 7.2% of creation
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without him

Kevin Porter Jr. · Jalen Green · Kenyon Martin Jr. · Usman Garuba · Tari Eason

shrunk net -2.5350 over 165 possessions

on floor 1164 possessions · off floor 6035 possessions

HOU · 2021-22No supported replacement lineup sample

HOU did not have a sufficiently supported observed replacement lineup for Jae'Sean Tate. The database keeps the functional-loss evidence but does not invent a replacement plan.

rotation 52%loses 21.4% of passing
Replacement evidence

No replacement lineup is supported by the available evidence.

on floor 3853 possessions · off floor 3454 possessions

HOU · 2020-21Player function-loss evidence unavailable

HOU did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on Jae'Sean Tate.

rotation 59%
Replacement evidence

No replacement lineup is supported by the available evidence.

on floor 3771 possessions · off floor 2587 possessions

Known contract calendar

Governed contract events naming this player — dates carry their honest quality.
HOU · 2023-24Team option decisionJun 29, 2024Outside date, not a contract deadlinereported $7.57M

Jae'Sean Tate has a reported team option for the 2025 season at a reported $7,565,217. Team controls the option. The stored date is the CBA outside date; the contract may require an earlier decision.

HOU · 2023-24Contract control horizonJun 30, 2025

Jae'Sean Tate has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2025 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. The player is inside the two-season extension-review horizon, but exact eligibility and value are not certified.

HOU · 2022-23Team option decisionJun 29, 2024Outside date, not a contract deadlinereported $7.57M

Jae'Sean Tate has a reported team option for the 2025 season at a reported $7,565,217. Team controls the option. The stored date is the CBA outside date; the contract may require an earlier decision.

HOU · 2022-23Contract control horizonJun 30, 2025

Jae'Sean Tate has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2025 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. The player is inside the two-season extension-review horizon, but exact eligibility and value are not certified.

Function scores, roles, dependence records and contract events are separate evidence. No combined player value, trade value or ranking is computed from them, and none of them is a causal impact claim.