
Jalen Suggs
What does Jalen Suggs actually supply on the floor?
Jalen Suggs's strongest evidenced functions are event creation, passing, creation; the weakest available areas are shooting, rebounding, interior finishing. The profile is tied to ORL for 2025-26.
Function profile
2025-26 — eleven separate readings on a league scale. They are not additive.* limited evidence for that function. A dash means the evidence was insufficient — not a zero. Use the separate function strengths to evaluate role and roster fit; do not treat them as one player-value score. POA or switch conclusions require lineup, matchup, and assignment evidence beyond this profile.
Season by season
Every governed season profile on record.| Season | Team | Role | Evidence | Creation | Rim pressure | Shooting | Passing | Screening | Interior finish | Point of attack | Switch coverage | Rim protection | Event creation | Rebounding |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | ORL | Primary starter | High evidence | 66 | 56 | 48 | 69 | — | 52 | — | — | 53 | 84 | 49 |
| 2024-25 | ORL | — | Mixed coverage | 64 | 56 | 40 | 60 | 51 | 56 | 54 | 55 | 57 | 76 | 39 |
| 2023-24 | ORL | — | High evidence | 55 | 53 | 66 | 57 | 46 | 38 | 44 | 38 | 58 | 76 | 25 |
| 2022-23 | ORL | — | High evidence | 58 | 47 | 42 | 58 | — | 45 | 51 | 49 | 48 | 74 | 45 |
| 2021-22 | ORL | — | High evidence | 64 | 54 | 31 | 66 | — | 55 | 56 | 57 | 55 | 66 | 27 |
What teams depended on him for
Seasons where a team's situation report named him a dependency case.ORL was highly dependent on Jalen Suggs. Removing him cost about 28.4% of event creation production, and lineups with him performed 5.2 points per 100 possessions better than lineups without him. The best supported replacement group was [Wendell Carter Jr., Desmond Bane, Paolo Banchero, Anthony Black, Tristan da Silva] over 326 possessions.
Replacement evidence
Wendell Carter Jr. · Desmond Bane · Paolo Banchero · Anthony Black · Tristan da Silva
shrunk net 3.7930 over 326 possessions
on floor 3579 possessions · off floor 4458 possessions
ORL lineups performed 4.4 points per 100 possessions better with Jalen Suggs than without him. The best supported alternative was [Kentavious Caldwell-Pope, Wendell Carter Jr., Cole Anthony, Franz Wagner, Paolo Banchero] over 352 possessions.
Replacement evidence
Kentavious Caldwell-Pope · Wendell Carter Jr. · Cole Anthony · Franz Wagner · Paolo Banchero
shrunk net 2.4740 over 352 possessions
on floor 1779 possessions · off floor 5706 possessions
ORL had a supported lineup path without Jalen Suggs: [Joe Ingles, Jonathan Isaac, Moritz Wagner, Cole Anthony, Anthony Black] at 5.0 adjusted net points per 100 possessions over 162 possessions. This is an observed option, not proof it is universally better.
Replacement evidence
Joe Ingles · Jonathan Isaac · Moritz Wagner · Cole Anthony · Anthony Black
shrunk net 4.9850 over 162 possessions
on floor 4186 possessions · off floor 3567 possessions
ORL had an observed replacement lineup for Jalen Suggs, but it came with a performance cost. The supported alternative was [Gary Harris, Markelle Fultz, Wendell Carter Jr., Franz Wagner, Paolo Banchero] at -0.6 adjusted net points per 100 possessions over 1082 possessions.
Replacement evidence
Gary Harris · Markelle Fultz · Wendell Carter Jr. · Franz Wagner · Paolo Banchero
shrunk net -0.5710 over 1082 possessions
on floor 2311 possessions · off floor 5003 possessions
ORL had a supported lineup path without Jalen Suggs: [Gary Harris, Mo Bamba, Wendell Carter Jr., Cole Anthony, Franz Wagner] at 1.7 adjusted net points per 100 possessions over 304 possessions. This is an observed option, not proof it is universally better.
Replacement evidence
Gary Harris · Mo Bamba · Wendell Carter Jr. · Cole Anthony · Franz Wagner
shrunk net 1.7410 over 304 possessions
on floor 2488 possessions · off floor 4857 possessions
Known contract calendar
Governed contract events naming this player — dates carry their honest quality.No governed contract-calendar events name this player.
Function scores, roles, dependence records and contract events are separate evidence. No combined player value, trade value or ranking is computed from them, and none of them is a causal impact claim.