Jerami Grant
POR · 2025-26Rotation connectorHigh evidenceWhat does Jerami Grant actually supply on the floor?
Jerami Grant's strongest evidenced functions are shooting, interior finishing, rim pressure; the weakest available areas are event creation, passing, rebounding. The profile is tied to POR for 2025-26.
Function profile
2025-26 — eleven separate readings on a league scale. They are not additive.* limited evidence for that function. A dash means the evidence was insufficient — not a zero. Use the separate function strengths to evaluate role and roster fit; do not treat them as one player-value score. POA or switch conclusions require lineup, matchup, and assignment evidence beyond this profile.
Season by season
Every governed season profile on record.| Season | Team | Role | Evidence | Creation | Rim pressure | Shooting | Passing | Screening | Interior finish | Point of attack | Switch coverage | Rim protection | Event creation | Rebounding |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | POR | Rotation connector | High evidence | 54 | 65 | 68 | 45 | — | 68 | — | — | 51 | 38 | 50 |
| 2024-25 | POR | — | High evidence | 52 | 43 | 60 | 54 | — | 43 | 47 | 50 | 59 | 49 | 39 |
| 2023-24 | POR | — | High evidence | 57 | 58 | 60 | 53 | 42 | 57 | 54 | 55 | 43 | 46 | 31 |
| 2022-23 | POR | — | High evidence | 52 | 62 | 71 | 47 | 45 | 61 | 57 | 54 | 55 | 46 | 49 |
| 2021-22 | DET | — | High evidence | 58 | 59 | 60 | 55 | 42 | 57 | 48 | 54 | 61 | 60 | 36 |
| 2020-21 | — | — | High evidence | 61 | 66 | 52 | 54 | — | 62 | — | — | 60 | 37 | 54 |
| 2019-20 | DEN | — | High evidence | 40 | 66 | 69 | 36 | — | 77 | — | — | 66 | 52 | 46 |
| 2018-19 | OKC | — | High evidence | 28 | 60 | 74 | 25 | — | 74 | — | — | 74 | 45 | 36 |
| 2017-18 | OKC | — | High evidence | 38 | 66 | 42 | 33 | — | 70 | — | — | 76 | 43 | 54 |
| 2016-17 | — | — | High evidence | 31 | 61 | 61 | 28 | — | 54 | — | — | 76 | 44 | 43 |
| 2015-16 | PHI | — | Limited evidence | 50 | 64 | 36 | 43 | — | — | — | — | 75 | 53 | — |
| 2014-15 | PHI | — | Limited evidence | 52 | 61 | 46 | 47 | — | — | — | — | 74 | 55 | — |
What teams depended on him for
Seasons where a team's situation report named him a dependency case.POR had a supported lineup path without Jerami Grant: [Deni Avdija, Shaedon Sharpe, Kris Murray, Toumani Camara, Donovan Clingan] at 1.1 adjusted net points per 100 possessions over 206 possessions. This is an observed option, not proof it is universally better.
Replacement evidence
Deni Avdija · Shaedon Sharpe · Kris Murray · Toumani Camara · Donovan Clingan
shrunk net 1.1120 over 206 possessions
on floor 3370 possessions · off floor 4453 possessions
POR had a supported lineup path without Jerami Grant: [Anfernee Simons, Deandre Ayton, Deni Avdija, Shaedon Sharpe, Toumani Camara] at 1.1 adjusted net points per 100 possessions over 251 possessions. This is an observed option, not proof it is universally better.
Replacement evidence
Anfernee Simons · Deandre Ayton · Deni Avdija · Shaedon Sharpe · Toumani Camara
shrunk net 1.1240 over 251 possessions
on floor 2785 possessions · off floor 4455 possessions
POR had an observed replacement lineup for Jerami Grant, but it came with a performance cost. The supported alternative was [Deandre Ayton, Scoot Henderson, Jabari Walker, Kris Murray, Rayan Rupert] at -3.4 adjusted net points per 100 possessions over 183 possessions.
Replacement evidence
Deandre Ayton · Scoot Henderson · Jabari Walker · Kris Murray · Rayan Rupert
shrunk net -3.3640 over 183 possessions
on floor 3232 possessions · off floor 3780 possessions
POR did not have a sufficiently supported observed replacement lineup for Jerami Grant. The database keeps the functional-loss evidence but does not invent a replacement plan.
Replacement evidence
No replacement lineup is supported by the available evidence.
on floor 4108 possessions · off floor 3138 possessions
DET had an observed replacement lineup for Jerami Grant, but it came with a performance cost. The supported alternative was [Hamidou Diallo, Killian Hayes, Saddiq Bey, Isaiah Stewart, Cade Cunningham] at -3.6 adjusted net points per 100 possessions over 290 possessions.
Replacement evidence
Hamidou Diallo · Killian Hayes · Saddiq Bey · Isaiah Stewart · Cade Cunningham
shrunk net -3.5620 over 290 possessions
on floor 2671 possessions · off floor 4466 possessions
DET did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on Jerami Grant.
Replacement evidence
No replacement lineup is supported by the available evidence.
on floor 3299 possessions · off floor 2889 possessions
DEN had a supported lineup path without Jerami Grant: [Paul Millsap, Will Barton, Gary Harris, Nikola Jokic, Jamal Murray] at 4.9 adjusted net points per 100 possessions over 1305 possessions. This is an observed option, not proof it is universally better.
Replacement evidence
Paul Millsap · Will Barton · Gary Harris · Nikola Jokic · Jamal Murray
shrunk net 4.9390 over 1305 possessions
on floor 4282 possessions · off floor 3357 possessions
OKC did not have a sufficiently supported observed replacement lineup for Jerami Grant. The database keeps the functional-loss evidence but does not invent a replacement plan.
Replacement evidence
No replacement lineup is supported by the available evidence.
on floor 5356 possessions · off floor 2619 possessions
OKC had a supported lineup path without Jerami Grant: [Carmelo Anthony, Russell Westbrook, Paul George, Andre Roberson, Steven Adams] at 10.0 adjusted net points per 100 possessions over 976 possessions. This is an observed option, not proof it is universally better.
Replacement evidence
Carmelo Anthony · Russell Westbrook · Paul George · Andre Roberson · Steven Adams
shrunk net 9.9510 over 976 possessions
on floor 3089 possessions · off floor 4487 possessions
OKC did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on Jerami Grant.
Replacement evidence
Russell Westbrook · Taj Gibson · Andre Roberson · Steven Adams · Victor Oladipo
shrunk net 8.5620 over 549 possessions
on floor 2813 possessions · off floor 4699 possessions
PHI did not have enough resolved lineup possessions involving Jerami Grant for a dependable replacement conclusion.
Replacement evidence
Ersan Ilyasova · Robert Covington · Nik Stauskas · Joel Embiid · T.J. McConnell
shrunk net 5.2930 over 214 possessions
on floor 73 possessions · off floor 7073 possessions
PHI did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on Jerami Grant.
Replacement evidence
Ish Smith · Nerlens Noel · Robert Covington · Nik Stauskas · Jahlil Okafor
shrunk net -4.7450 over 215 possessions
on floor 3727 possessions · off floor 3385 possessions
PHI did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on Jerami Grant.
Replacement evidence
Luc Mbah a Moute · Nerlens Noel · Michael Carter-Williams · Robert Covington · KJ McDaniels
shrunk net 4.9220 over 264 possessions
on floor 2243 possessions · off floor 4405 possessions
Known contract calendar
Governed contract events naming this player — dates carry their honest quality.Jerami Grant has a reported player option for the 2028 season at a reported $36,413,790. Player controls the option. The stored date is the CBA outside date; the contract may require an earlier decision.
Jerami Grant has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2028 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. The player is inside the two-season extension-review horizon, but exact eligibility and value are not certified.
Jerami Grant has a reported player option for the 2028 season at a reported $36,413,790. Player controls the option. The stored date is the CBA outside date; the contract may require an earlier decision.
Jerami Grant has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2028 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. No extension-review trigger is applied yet.
Jerami Grant has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2023 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. The player is inside the two-season extension-review horizon, but exact eligibility and value are not certified.
Jerami Grant has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2023 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. The player is inside the two-season extension-review horizon, but exact eligibility and value are not certified.
Jerami Grant has a reported player option for the 2021 season at a reported $19,050,000. Player controls the option. The stored date is the CBA outside date; the contract may require an earlier decision.
Jerami Grant has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2021 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. The player is inside the two-season extension-review horizon, but exact eligibility and value are not certified.
Jerami Grant has a reported player option for the 2021 season at a reported $19,050,000. Player controls the option. The stored date is the CBA outside date; the contract may require an earlier decision.
Jerami Grant has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2021 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. The player is inside the two-season extension-review horizon, but exact eligibility and value are not certified.
Jerami Grant has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2018 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. The player is inside the two-season extension-review horizon, but exact eligibility and value are not certified.
Function scores, roles, dependence records and contract events are separate evidence. No combined player value, trade value or ranking is computed from them, and none of them is a causal impact claim.