
Joe Johnson
What does Joe Johnson actually supply on the floor?
Joe Johnson's strongest evidenced functions are rim pressure, rim protection, creation; the weakest available areas are event creation, interior finishing, passing. The profile is tied to BOS for 2021-22.
Function profile
2021-22 — eleven separate readings on a league scale. They are not additive.* limited evidence for that function. A dash means the evidence was insufficient — not a zero. Use the separate function strengths to evaluate role and roster fit; do not treat them as one player-value score. POA or switch conclusions require lineup, matchup, and assignment evidence beyond this profile.
Season by season
Every governed season profile on record.| Season | Team | Role | Evidence | Creation | Rim pressure | Shooting | Passing | Screening | Interior finish | Point of attack | Switch coverage | Rim protection | Event creation | Rebounding |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-22 | BOS | — | Limited evidence | 50 | 50 | — | 50 | — | 50 | — | — | 50 | 50 | — |
| 2017-18 | — | — | High evidence | 57 | 37 | 38 | 57 | — | 47 | — | — | 37 | 22 | 45 |
| 2016-17 | UTA | — | High evidence | 60 | 42 | 76 | 60 | — | 46 | — | — | 40 | 30 | 57 |
| 2015-16 | — | — | Limited evidence | 77 | 48 | 70 | 80 | — | — | — | — | 27 | 24 | — |
| 2014-15 | BRK | — | Limited evidence | 74 | 51 | 63 | 74 | — | — | — | — | 27 | 25 | — |
| 2013-14 | BRK | — | Limited evidence | 70 | 53 | 75 | 67 | — | — | — | — | 32 | 24 | — |
What teams depended on him for
Seasons where a team's situation report named him a dependency case.BOS did not have enough resolved lineup possessions involving Joe Johnson for a dependable replacement conclusion.
Replacement evidence
Al Horford · Marcus Smart · Jaylen Brown · Jayson Tatum · Robert Williams III
shrunk net 14.4950 over 1093 possessions
on floor 3 possessions · off floor 9067 possessions
HOU did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on Joe Johnson.
Replacement evidence
Trevor Ariza · Eric Gordon · Ryan Anderson · James Harden · Clint Capela
shrunk net 10.0990 over 412 possessions
on floor 1011 possessions · off floor 7679 possessions
UTA did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on Joe Johnson.
Replacement evidence
Ricky Rubio · Jae Crowder · Rudy Gobert · Joe Ingles · Donovan Mitchell
shrunk net 11.4670 over 365 possessions
on floor 1231 possessions · off floor 6658 possessions
UTA had a supported lineup path without Joe Johnson: [George Hill, Derrick Favors, Gordon Hayward, Rudy Gobert, Joe Ingles] at 7.4 adjusted net points per 100 possessions over 265 possessions. This is an observed option, not proof it is universally better.
Replacement evidence
George Hill · Derrick Favors · Gordon Hayward · Rudy Gobert · Joe Ingles
shrunk net 7.4120 over 265 possessions
on floor 3629 possessions · off floor 3879 possessions
MIA did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on Joe Johnson.
Replacement evidence
Dwyane Wade · Luol Deng · Goran Dragic · Hassan Whiteside · Justise Winslow
shrunk net 4.4500 over 285 possessions
on floor 2140 possessions · off floor 5787 possessions
BRK did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on Joe Johnson.
Replacement evidence
Thaddeus Young · Brook Lopez · Wayne Ellington · Donald Sloan · Bojan Bogdanovic
shrunk net -2.5450 over 286 possessions
on floor 3455 possessions · off floor 3619 possessions
BRK did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on Joe Johnson.
Replacement evidence
No replacement lineup is supported by the available evidence.
on floor 5179 possessions · off floor 2119 possessions
BRK did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on Joe Johnson.
Replacement evidence
No replacement lineup is supported by the available evidence.
on floor 5074 possessions · off floor 2571 possessions
Known contract calendar
Governed contract events naming this player — dates carry their honest quality.Joe Johnson has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2018 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. The player is inside the two-season extension-review horizon, but exact eligibility and value are not certified.
Function scores, roles, dependence records and contract events are separate evidence. No combined player value, trade value or ranking is computed from them, and none of them is a causal impact claim.