Jrue Holiday
POR · 2025-26Primary starterHigh evidenceWhat does Jrue Holiday actually supply on the floor?
Jrue Holiday's strongest evidenced functions are passing, creation, shooting; the weakest available areas are rim protection, event creation, interior finishing. The profile is tied to POR for 2025-26.
Function profile
2025-26 — eleven separate readings on a league scale. They are not additive.* limited evidence for that function. A dash means the evidence was insufficient — not a zero. Use the separate function strengths to evaluate role and roster fit; do not treat them as one player-value score. POA or switch conclusions require lineup, matchup, and assignment evidence beyond this profile.
Season by season
Every governed season profile on record.| Season | Team | Role | Evidence | Creation | Rim pressure | Shooting | Passing | Screening | Interior finish | Point of attack | Switch coverage | Rim protection | Event creation | Rebounding |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | POR | Primary starter | High evidence | 77 | 54 | 67 | 78 | — | 45 | — | — | 26 | 43 | 56 |
| 2024-25 | BOS | — | High evidence | 64 | 51 | 54 | 75 | 45 | 56 | 46 | 37 | 40 | 55 | 37 |
| 2023-24 | BOS | — | High evidence | 72 | 52 | 75 | 81 | 42 | 53 | 41 | 52 | 51 | 48 | 44 |
| 2022-23 | MIL | — | High evidence | 84 | 58 | 64 | 87 | — | 50 | 56 | 59 | 37 | 62 | 55 |
| 2021-22 | MIL | — | High evidence | 80 | 60 | 68 | 81 | — | 56 | 52 | 56 | 45 | 71 | 52 |
| 2020-21 | — | — | High evidence | 81 | 63 | 67 | 82 | — | 57 | — | — | 50 | 79 | 53 |
| 2019-20 | NOP | — | High evidence | 83 | 56 | 55 | 82 | — | 49 | — | — | 55 | 76 | 41 |
| 2018-19 | NOP | — | High evidence | 85 | 64 | 44 | 82 | — | 59 | — | — | 41 | 77 | 45 |
| 2017-18 | NOP | — | High evidence | 78 | 64 | 49 | 77 | — | 70 | — | — | 49 | 75 | 38 |
| 2016-17 | NOP | — | High evidence | 76 | 56 | 58 | 77 | — | 43 | — | — | 47 | 77 | 39 |
| 2015-16 | NOP | — | Limited evidence | 91 | 64 | 52 | 88 | — | — | — | — | 37 | 73 | — |
| 2014-15 | NOP | — | Limited evidence | 87 | 64 | 65 | 86 | — | — | — | — | 52 | 77 | — |
| 2013-14 | NOP | — | Limited evidence | 88 | 60 | 61 | 87 | — | — | — | — | 43 | 72 | — |
What teams depended on him for
Seasons where a team's situation report named him a dependency case.POR lineups performed 7.7 points per 100 possessions better with Jrue Holiday than without him. The best supported alternative was [Deni Avdija, Shaedon Sharpe, Kris Murray, Toumani Camara, Donovan Clingan] over 206 possessions.
Replacement evidence
Deni Avdija · Shaedon Sharpe · Kris Murray · Toumani Camara · Donovan Clingan
shrunk net 1.1120 over 206 possessions
on floor 3348 possessions · off floor 4475 possessions
BOS had a supported lineup path without Jrue Holiday: [Al Horford, Jayson Tatum, Luke Kornet, Payton Pritchard, Sam Hauser] at 4.2 adjusted net points per 100 possessions over 225 possessions. This is an observed option, not proof it is universally better.
Replacement evidence
Al Horford · Jayson Tatum · Luke Kornet · Payton Pritchard · Sam Hauser
shrunk net 4.1880 over 225 possessions
on floor 3942 possessions · off floor 4069 possessions
BOS had a supported lineup path without Jrue Holiday: [Al Horford, Kristaps Porzingis, Jaylen Brown, Derrick White, Sam Hauser] at 5.5 adjusted net points per 100 possessions over 156 possessions. This is an observed option, not proof it is universally better.
Replacement evidence
Al Horford · Kristaps Porzingis · Jaylen Brown · Derrick White · Sam Hauser
shrunk net 5.4780 over 156 possessions
on floor 5375 possessions · off floor 3398 possessions
MIL did not have a sufficiently supported observed replacement lineup for Jrue Holiday. The database keeps the functional-loss evidence but does not invent a replacement plan.
Replacement evidence
No replacement lineup is supported by the available evidence.
on floor 4361 possessions · off floor 3284 possessions
MIL did not have a sufficiently supported observed replacement lineup for Jrue Holiday. The database keeps the functional-loss evidence but does not invent a replacement plan.
Replacement evidence
No replacement lineup is supported by the available evidence.
on floor 4830 possessions · off floor 3331 possessions
MIL did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on Jrue Holiday.
Replacement evidence
D.J. Augustin · Brook Lopez · Khris Middleton · Giannis Antetokounmpo · Donte DiVincenzo
shrunk net 6.0200 over 161 possessions
on floor 5262 possessions · off floor 3275 possessions
NOP lineups performed 5.0 points per 100 possessions better with Jrue Holiday than without him. The best supported alternative was [JJ Redick, Derrick Favors, Brandon Ingram, Lonzo Ball, Josh Hart] over 185 possessions.
Replacement evidence
JJ Redick · Derrick Favors · Brandon Ingram · Lonzo Ball · Josh Hart
shrunk net -3.6660 over 185 possessions
on floor 3997 possessions · off floor 2542 possessions
NOP did not have a sufficiently supported observed replacement lineup for Jrue Holiday. The database keeps the functional-loss evidence but does not invent a replacement plan.
Replacement evidence
No replacement lineup is supported by the available evidence.
on floor 4616 possessions · off floor 2998 possessions
NOP did not have a sufficiently supported observed replacement lineup for Jrue Holiday. The database keeps the functional-loss evidence but does not invent a replacement plan.
Replacement evidence
No replacement lineup is supported by the available evidence.
on floor 6163 possessions · off floor 2102 possessions
NOP did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on Jrue Holiday.
Replacement evidence
Omer Asik · E'Twaun Moore · Anthony Davis · Solomon Hill · Tim Frazier
shrunk net -0.0900 over 219 possessions
on floor 3973 possessions · off floor 3251 possessions
NOP did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on Jrue Holiday.
Replacement evidence
Eric Gordon · Omer Asik · Tyreke Evans · Alonzo Gee · Anthony Davis
shrunk net -3.1990 over 233 possessions
on floor 3289 possessions · off floor 3838 possessions
NOP did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on Jrue Holiday.
Replacement evidence
Eric Gordon · Omer Asik · Tyreke Evans · Dante Cunningham · Anthony Davis
shrunk net 2.5470 over 368 possessions
on floor 2370 possessions · off floor 4728 possessions
NOP did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on Jrue Holiday.
Replacement evidence
Eric Gordon · Alexis Ajinca · Tyreke Evans · Anthony Davis · Brian Roberts
shrunk net -1.5590 over 158 possessions
on floor 1926 possessions · off floor 4722 possessions
Known contract calendar
Governed contract events naming this player — dates carry their honest quality.Jrue Holiday has a reported player option for the 2028 season at a reported $37,200,000. Player controls the option. The stored date is the CBA outside date; the contract may require an earlier decision.
Jrue Holiday has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2028 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. The player is inside the two-season extension-review horizon, but exact eligibility and value are not certified.
Jrue Holiday has a reported player option for the 2028 season at a reported $37,200,000. Player controls the option. The stored date is the CBA outside date; the contract may require an earlier decision.
Jrue Holiday has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2028 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. No extension-review trigger is applied yet.
Jrue Holiday has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2022 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. The player is inside the two-season extension-review horizon, but exact eligibility and value are not certified.
Jrue Holiday has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2022 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. The player is inside the two-season extension-review horizon, but exact eligibility and value are not certified.
Jrue Holiday has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2022 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. No extension-review trigger is applied yet.
Function scores, roles, dependence records and contract events are separate evidence. No combined player value, trade value or ranking is computed from them, and none of them is a causal impact claim.