
Killian Hayes
What does Killian Hayes actually supply on the floor?
Killian Hayes's strongest evidenced functions are passing, creation, event creation; the weakest available areas are interior finishing, rim pressure, shooting. The profile is tied to SAC for 2025-26.
Function profile
2025-26 — eleven separate readings on a league scale. They are not additive.* limited evidence for that function. A dash means the evidence was insufficient — not a zero. Use the separate function strengths to evaluate role and roster fit; do not treat them as one player-value score. POA or switch conclusions require lineup, matchup, and assignment evidence beyond this profile.
Season by season
Every governed season profile on record.| Season | Team | Role | Evidence | Creation | Rim pressure | Shooting | Passing | Screening | Interior finish | Point of attack | Switch coverage | Rim protection | Event creation | Rebounding |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | SAC | Emergency depth | Mixed coverage | 66 | 42 | 43 | 69 | — | 25 | — | — | 44 | 65 | 49 |
| 2024-25 | BRK | — | Mixed coverage | 52 | 54 | 51 | 54 | — | 44 | 48 | 48 | 51 | 45 | 45 |
| 2023-24 | DET | — | Mixed coverage | 68 | 43 | 42 | 74 | — | 42 | 44 | 41 | 45 | 58 | 44 |
| 2022-23 | DET | — | High evidence | 74 | 39 | 32 | 78 | — | 41 | 41 | 38 | 49 | 73 | 30 |
| 2021-22 | DET | — | High evidence | 67 | 49 | 34 | 71 | — | 32 | 43 | 42 | 54 | 74 | 40 |
| 2020-21 | DET | — | Mixed coverage | 67 | 42 | 42 | 70 | — | 17 | 48 | 50 | 42 | 62 | 31 |
What teams depended on him for
Seasons where a team's situation report named him a dependency case.SAC lineups performed 7.0 points per 100 possessions better with Killian Hayes than without him. The best supported alternative was [Russell Westbrook, DeMar DeRozan, Zach LaVine, Keegan Murray, Maxime Raynaud] over 168 possessions.
Replacement evidence
Russell Westbrook · DeMar DeRozan · Zach LaVine · Keegan Murray · Maxime Raynaud
shrunk net 1.8840 over 168 possessions
on floor 709 possessions · off floor 6352 possessions
BRK did not have enough resolved lineup possessions involving Killian Hayes for a dependable replacement conclusion.
Replacement evidence
Dennis Schroder · Dorian Finney-Smith · Nic Claxton · Cameron Johnson · Cam Thomas
shrunk net 1.9580 over 190 possessions
on floor 285 possessions · off floor 6688 possessions
DET did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on Killian Hayes.
Replacement evidence
Isaiah Stewart · Cade Cunningham · Jaden Ivey · Jalen Duren · Simone Fontecchio
shrunk net 1.0140 over 175 possessions
on floor 1856 possessions · off floor 5339 possessions
DET did not have strong functional backup for Killian Hayes in passing; removing him cost about 27.9% of the team's production in that area. The next observed option was Jaden Ivey.
Replacement evidence
Alec Burks · Bojan Bogdanovic · Saddiq Bey · Jaden Ivey · Jalen Duren
shrunk net 1.3400 over 157 possessions
on floor 3964 possessions · off floor 3363 possessions
DET had a supported lineup path without Killian Hayes: [Cory Joseph, Jerami Grant, Saddiq Bey, Isaiah Stewart, Cade Cunningham] at 3.8 adjusted net points per 100 possessions over 515 possessions. This is an observed option, not proof it is universally better.
Replacement evidence
Cory Joseph · Jerami Grant · Saddiq Bey · Isaiah Stewart · Cade Cunningham
shrunk net 3.7580 over 515 possessions
on floor 3004 possessions · off floor 4133 possessions
DET did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on Killian Hayes.
Replacement evidence
Blake Griffin · Wayne Ellington · Mason Plumlee · Jerami Grant · Delon Wright
shrunk net -2.1500 over 328 possessions
on floor 1211 possessions · off floor 4969 possessions
Known contract calendar
Governed contract events naming this player — dates carry their honest quality.No governed contract-calendar events name this player.
Function scores, roles, dependence records and contract events are separate evidence. No combined player value, trade value or ranking is computed from them, and none of them is a causal impact claim.