Kris Dunn
LAC · 2025-26Rotation connectorHigh evidenceWhat does Kris Dunn actually supply on the floor?
Kris Dunn's strongest evidenced functions are passing, event creation, creation; the weakest available areas are rim protection, rebounding, interior finishing. The profile is tied to LAC for 2025-26.
Function profile
2025-26 — eleven separate readings on a league scale. They are not additive.* limited evidence for that function. A dash means the evidence was insufficient — not a zero. Use the separate function strengths to evaluate role and roster fit; do not treat them as one player-value score. POA or switch conclusions require lineup, matchup, and assignment evidence beyond this profile.
Season by season
Every governed season profile on record.| Season | Team | Role | Evidence | Creation | Rim pressure | Shooting | Passing | Screening | Interior finish | Point of attack | Switch coverage | Rim protection | Event creation | Rebounding |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | LAC | Rotation connector | High evidence | 68 | 45 | 58 | 73 | — | 43 | — | — | 37 | 71 | 39 |
| 2024-25 | LAC | — | High evidence | 53 | 40 | 46 | 61 | 44 | 48 | 66 | 71 | 45 | 78 | 37 |
| 2023-24 | UTA | — | High evidence | 67 | 45 | 53 | 73 | — | 19 | 42 | 42 | 50 | 76 | 40 |
| 2022-23 | UTA | — | Mixed coverage | 71 | 57 | 61 | 70 | — | 46 | 46 | 43 | 44 | 65 | 53 |
| 2021-22 | POR | — | Mixed coverage | 65 | 52 | 45 | 68 | — | 55 | 65 | 65 | 44 | 67 | 38 |
| 2020-21 | ATL | — | Mixed coverage | 46 | 49 | 49 | 44 | — | 44 | — | — | 51 | 56 | 48 |
| 2019-20 | CHI | — | High evidence | 68 | 50 | 38 | 67 | — | 39 | — | — | 42 | 79 | 40 |
| 2018-19 | CHI | — | High evidence | 78 | 47 | 53 | 77 | — | 52 | — | — | 53 | 76 | 38 |
| 2017-18 | CHI | — | High evidence | 66 | 55 | 46 | 67 | — | 61 | — | — | 45 | 82 | 27 |
| 2016-17 | MIN | — | High evidence | 49 | 41 | 43 | 51 | — | 26 | — | — | 63 | 83 | 33 |
What teams depended on him for
Seasons where a team's situation report named him a dependency case.LAC did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on Kris Dunn.
Replacement evidence
Brook Lopez · Kawhi Leonard · Derrick Jones Jr. · John Collins · Darius Garland
shrunk net 4.4620 over 199 possessions
on floor 4015 possessions · off floor 3080 possessions
LAC lineups performed 4.8 points per 100 possessions better with Kris Dunn than without him. The best supported alternative was [James Harden, Kawhi Leonard, Norman Powell, Ivica Zubac, Derrick Jones Jr.] over 375 possessions.
Replacement evidence
James Harden · Kawhi Leonard · Norman Powell · Ivica Zubac · Derrick Jones Jr.
shrunk net 10.5360 over 375 possessions
on floor 3557 possessions · off floor 4211 possessions
UTA was highly dependent on Kris Dunn. Removing him cost about 37.8% of event creation production, and lineups with him performed 8.8 points per 100 possessions better than lineups without him. The best supported replacement group was [Lauri Markkanen, John Collins, Collin Sexton, Taylor Hendricks, Keyonte George] over 202 possessions.
Replacement evidence
Lauri Markkanen · John Collins · Collin Sexton · Taylor Hendricks · Keyonte George
shrunk net -0.1820 over 202 possessions
on floor 2363 possessions · off floor 5013 possessions
UTA did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on Kris Dunn.
Replacement evidence
Kelly Olynyk · Lauri Markkanen · Talen Horton-Tucker · Ochai Agbaji · Walker Kessler
shrunk net 4.5500 over 287 possessions
on floor 1102 possessions · off floor 6235 possessions
POR did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on Kris Dunn.
Replacement evidence
Damian Lillard · CJ McCollum · Robert Covington · Jusuf Nurkic · Norman Powell
shrunk net -2.0210 over 539 possessions
on floor 613 possessions · off floor 6584 possessions
ATL did not have enough resolved lineup possessions involving Kris Dunn for a dependable replacement conclusion.
Replacement evidence
Solomon Hill · Clint Capela · Bogdan Bogdanovic · Kevin Huerter · Trae Young
shrunk net 6.1870 over 186 possessions
on floor 138 possessions · off floor 7674 possessions
CHI lineups performed 4.1 points per 100 possessions better with Kris Dunn than without him. The best supported alternative was [Tomas Satoransky, Otto Porter Jr., Zach LaVine, Lauri Markkanen, Wendell Carter Jr.] over 230 possessions.
Replacement evidence
Tomas Satoransky · Otto Porter Jr. · Zach LaVine · Lauri Markkanen · Wendell Carter Jr.
shrunk net 0.2140 over 230 possessions
on floor 2342 possessions · off floor 3386 possessions
CHI did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on Kris Dunn.
Replacement evidence
Justin Holiday · Zach LaVine · Jabari Parker · Ryan Arcidiacono · Wendell Carter Jr.
shrunk net -2.0150 over 438 possessions
on floor 2546 possessions · off floor 4750 possessions
CHI did not have strong functional backup for Kris Dunn in event creation; removing him cost about 26.1% of the team's production in that area. The next observed option was Justin Holiday.
Replacement evidence
Robin Lopez · Justin Holiday · Jerian Grant · David Nwaba · Lauri Markkanen
shrunk net 2.2810 over 158 possessions
on floor 2814 possessions · off floor 4436 possessions
MIN had a supported lineup path without Kris Dunn: [Ricky Rubio, Gorgui Dieng, Shabazz Muhammad, Andrew Wiggins, Karl-Anthony Towns] at 7.1 adjusted net points per 100 possessions over 259 possessions. This is an observed option, not proof it is universally better.
Replacement evidence
Ricky Rubio · Gorgui Dieng · Shabazz Muhammad · Andrew Wiggins · Karl-Anthony Towns
shrunk net 7.0560 over 259 possessions
on floor 2334 possessions · off floor 4732 possessions
Known contract calendar
Governed contract events naming this player — dates carry their honest quality.Kris Dunn has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2027 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. The player is inside the two-season extension-review horizon, but exact eligibility and value are not certified.
Kris Dunn has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2027 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. The player is inside the two-season extension-review horizon, but exact eligibility and value are not certified.
Kris Dunn has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2024 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. The player is inside the two-season extension-review horizon, but exact eligibility and value are not certified.
Kris Dunn has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2020 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. The player is inside the two-season extension-review horizon, but exact eligibility and value are not certified.
Kris Dunn has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2020 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. The player is inside the two-season extension-review horizon, but exact eligibility and value are not certified.
Kris Dunn has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2020 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. The player is inside the two-season extension-review horizon, but exact eligibility and value are not certified.
Kris Dunn has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2020 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. No extension-review trigger is applied yet.
Function scores, roles, dependence records and contract events are separate evidence. No combined player value, trade value or ranking is computed from them, and none of them is a causal impact claim.