Malcolm Brogdon
WAS · 2024-25Mixed coverageWhat does Malcolm Brogdon actually supply on the floor?
Malcolm Brogdon's strongest evidenced functions are creation, passing, rim pressure; the weakest available areas are interior finishing, event creation, rim protection. The profile is tied to WAS for 2024-25.
Function profile
2024-25 — eleven separate readings on a league scale. They are not additive.* limited evidence for that function. A dash means the evidence was insufficient — not a zero. Use the separate function strengths to evaluate role and roster fit; do not treat them as one player-value score. POA or switch conclusions require lineup, matchup, and assignment evidence beyond this profile.
Season by season
Every governed season profile on record.| Season | Team | Role | Evidence | Creation | Rim pressure | Shooting | Passing | Screening | Interior finish | Point of attack | Switch coverage | Rim protection | Event creation | Rebounding |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-25 | WAS | — | Mixed coverage | 66 | 57 | 46 | 64 | — | 28 | 56 | 59 | 40 | 32 | 55 |
| 2023-24 | POR | — | High evidence | 65 | 56 | 62 | 64 | — | 58 | 54 | 55 | 33 | 35 | 37 |
| 2022-23 | BOS | — | High evidence | 69 | 55 | 76 | 66 | — | 32 | 52 | 51 | 40 | 40 | 45 |
| 2021-22 | IND | — | High evidence | 76 | 58 | 43 | 76 | — | 36 | 55 | 62 | 47 | 42 | 46 |
| 2020-21 | IND | — | High evidence | 61 | 54 | 66 | 58 | — | 37 | 62 | 59 | 31 | 38 | 52 |
| 2019-20 | IND | — | High evidence | 83 | 55 | 44 | 81 | — | 51 | — | — | 33 | 26 | 45 |
| 2018-19 | MIL | — | High evidence | 67 | 63 | 76 | 62 | — | 48 | — | — | 41 | 35 | 56 |
| 2017-18 | MIL | — | High evidence | 64 | 63 | 63 | 62 | — | 55 | — | — | 44 | 47 | 33 |
| 2016-17 | MIL | — | High evidence | 65 | 54 | 72 | 68 | — | 43 | — | — | 34 | 64 | 36 |
What teams depended on him for
Seasons where a team's situation report named him a dependency case.WAS did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on Malcolm Brogdon.
Replacement evidence
Jonas Valanciunas · Jordan Poole · Corey Kispert · Bilal Coulibaly · Kyshawn George
shrunk net 0.5840 over 158 possessions
on floor 1058 possessions · off floor 6408 possessions
POR lineups performed 5.9 points per 100 possessions better with Malcolm Brogdon than without him. The best supported alternative was [Deandre Ayton, Scoot Henderson, Jabari Walker, Kris Murray, Rayan Rupert] over 183 possessions.
Replacement evidence
Deandre Ayton · Scoot Henderson · Jabari Walker · Kris Murray · Rayan Rupert
shrunk net -3.3640 over 183 possessions
on floor 2007 possessions · off floor 5005 possessions
BOS had a supported lineup path without Malcolm Brogdon: [Al Horford, Jaylen Brown, Jayson Tatum, Derrick White, Robert Williams III] at 7.9 adjusted net points per 100 possessions over 177 possessions. This is an observed option, not proof it is universally better.
Replacement evidence
Al Horford · Jaylen Brown · Jayson Tatum · Derrick White · Robert Williams III
shrunk net 7.9370 over 177 possessions
on floor 3945 possessions · off floor 5052 possessions
IND did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on Malcolm Brogdon.
Replacement evidence
No replacement lineup is supported by the available evidence.
on floor 2149 possessions · off floor 4908 possessions
IND did not have a sufficiently supported observed replacement lineup for Malcolm Brogdon. The database keeps the functional-loss evidence but does not invent a replacement plan.
Replacement evidence
No replacement lineup is supported by the available evidence.
on floor 3679 possessions · off floor 3078 possessions
IND did not have strong functional backup for Malcolm Brogdon in creation; removing him cost about 29.6% of the team's production in that area. The next observed option was T.J. McConnell.
Replacement evidence
Justin Holiday · Doug McDermott · T.J. McConnell · Domantas Sabonis · Aaron Holiday
shrunk net 4.6320 over 446 possessions
on floor 3162 possessions · off floor 3504 possessions
MIL lineups performed 3.9 points per 100 possessions better with Malcolm Brogdon than without him. The best supported alternative was [Brook Lopez, Eric Bledsoe, Khris Middleton, Giannis Antetokounmpo, Pat Connaughton] over 165 possessions.
Replacement evidence
Brook Lopez · Eric Bledsoe · Khris Middleton · Giannis Antetokounmpo · Pat Connaughton
shrunk net 2.6890 over 165 possessions
on floor 3845 possessions · off floor 4971 possessions
MIL had a supported lineup path without Malcolm Brogdon: [Eric Bledsoe, John Henson, Khris Middleton, Tony Snell, Giannis Antetokounmpo] at 2.9 adjusted net points per 100 possessions over 1170 possessions. This is an observed option, not proof it is universally better.
Replacement evidence
Eric Bledsoe · John Henson · Khris Middleton · Tony Snell · Giannis Antetokounmpo
shrunk net 2.9130 over 1170 possessions
on floor 2826 possessions · off floor 4749 possessions
MIL lineups performed 4.7 points per 100 possessions better with Malcolm Brogdon than without him. The best supported alternative was [Khris Middleton, Tony Snell, Giannis Antetokounmpo, Matthew Dellavedova, Thon Maker] over 177 possessions.
Replacement evidence
Khris Middleton · Tony Snell · Giannis Antetokounmpo · Matthew Dellavedova · Thon Maker
shrunk net 3.0770 over 177 possessions
on floor 3733 possessions · off floor 3693 possessions
Known contract calendar
Governed contract events naming this player — dates carry their honest quality.Malcolm Brogdon has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2023 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. The player is inside the two-season extension-review horizon, but exact eligibility and value are not certified.
Malcolm Brogdon has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2023 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. The player is inside the two-season extension-review horizon, but exact eligibility and value are not certified.
Malcolm Brogdon has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2023 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. The player is inside the two-season extension-review horizon, but exact eligibility and value are not certified.
Malcolm Brogdon has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2023 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. No extension-review trigger is applied yet.
Malcolm Brogdon has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2018 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. The player is inside the two-season extension-review horizon, but exact eligibility and value are not certified.
Malcolm Brogdon has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2018 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. The player is inside the two-season extension-review horizon, but exact eligibility and value are not certified.
Function scores, roles, dependence records and contract events are separate evidence. No combined player value, trade value or ranking is computed from them, and none of them is a causal impact claim.