Player Dossier

Mike Conley

MIN · 2025-26Rotation connectorMixed coverage

Connective passer · Pick-and-roll handler · Spot-up spacer · Helper / rotator

What does Mike Conley actually supply on the floor?

Mike Conley's strongest evidenced functions are passing, creation, event creation; the weakest available areas are interior finishing, rim pressure, rebounding. The profile is tied to MIN for 2025-26.

Function profile

2025-26 — eleven separate readings on a league scale. They are not additive.

Creation59

Rim pressure31

Shooting48

Passing68

Screening*—

Interior finish17

Point of attack*—

Switch coverage*—

Rim protection48

Event creation54

Rebounding42

* limited evidence for that function. A dash means the evidence was insufficient — not a zero. Use the separate function strengths to evaluate role and roster fit; do not treat them as one player-value score. POA or switch conclusions require lineup, matchup, and assignment evidence beyond this profile.

Season by season

Every governed season profile on record.

Season	Team	Role	Evidence	Creation	Rim pressure	Shooting	Passing	Screening	Interior finish	Point of attack	Switch coverage	Rim protection	Event creation	Rebounding
2025-26	MIN	Rotation connector	Mixed coverage	59	31	48	68	—	17	—	—	48	54	42
2024-25	MIN	—	High evidence	59	35	71	66	—	10	51	46	33	65	46
2023-24	MIN	—	High evidence	68	42	77	72	—	11	54	40	38	64	46
2022-23	—	—	High evidence	70	41	63	75	—	11	—	—	39	61	34
2021-22	UTA	—	High evidence	77	46	74	78	—	13	60	62	37	69	49
2020-21	UTA	—	High evidence	64	47	71	66	—	29	60	64	45	64	48
2019-20	UTA	—	Mixed coverage	70	45	64	69	—	13	—	—	28	36	43
2018-19	MEM	—	High evidence	69	54	65	67	—	45	—	—	41	67	41
2017-18	MEM	—	Mixed coverage	52	53	45	52	—	28	—	—	46	52	39
2016-17	MEM	—	High evidence	83	49	80	80	—	29	—	—	37	67	33
2015-16	MEM	—	Limited evidence	85	64	61	81	—	—	—	—	48	65	—
2014-15	MEM	—	Limited evidence	84	65	72	80	—	—	—	—	33	62	—
2013-14	MEM	—	Limited evidence	86	68	60	79	—	—	—	—	31	68	—

What teams depended on him for

Seasons where a team's situation report named him a dependency case.

No team-situation report names this player as a dependency case.

Known contract calendar

Governed contract events naming this player — dates carry their honest quality.

No governed contract-calendar events name this player.

Function scores, roles, dependence records and contract events are separate evidence. No combined player value, trade value or ranking is computed from them, and none of them is a causal impact claim.