Pascal Siakam
IND · 2025-26Franchise engineHigh evidenceWhat does Pascal Siakam actually supply on the floor?
Pascal Siakam's strongest evidenced functions are interior finishing, rim pressure, creation; the weakest available areas are event creation, rim protection, passing. The profile is tied to IND for 2025-26.
Function profile
2025-26 — eleven separate readings on a league scale. They are not additive.* limited evidence for that function. A dash means the evidence was insufficient — not a zero. Use the separate function strengths to evaluate role and roster fit; do not treat them as one player-value score. POA or switch conclusions require lineup, matchup, and assignment evidence beyond this profile.
Season by season
Every governed season profile on record.| Season | Team | Role | Evidence | Creation | Rim pressure | Shooting | Passing | Screening | Interior finish | Point of attack | Switch coverage | Rim protection | Event creation | Rebounding |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | IND | Franchise engine | High evidence | 66 | 70 | 58 | 57 | — | 74 | — | — | 48 | 47 | 60 |
| 2024-25 | IND | — | High evidence | 60 | 66 | 65 | 60 | 55 | 68 | 58 | 59 | 55 | 43 | 63 |
| 2023-24 | — | — | High evidence | 74 | 76 | 45 | 71 | — | 84 | — | — | 45 | 31 | 70 |
| 2022-23 | TOR | — | High evidence | 74 | 72 | 41 | 74 | 41 | 65 | 46 | 51 | 50 | 45 | 71 |
| 2021-22 | TOR | — | High evidence | 73 | 70 | 53 | 72 | 55 | 65 | 54 | 64 | 60 | 60 | 67 |
| 2020-21 | TOR | — | High evidence | 69 | 68 | 42 | 68 | 37 | 57 | 58 | 58 | 56 | 59 | 66 |
| 2019-20 | TOR | — | High evidence | 65 | 66 | 60 | 61 | — | 67 | — | — | 69 | 53 | 48 |
| 2018-19 | TOR | — | High evidence | 66 | 68 | 64 | 61 | — | 66 | — | — | 65 | 53 | 64 |
| 2017-18 | TOR | — | High evidence | 62 | 60 | 35 | 62 | — | 63 | — | — | 67 | 70 | 56 |
| 2016-17 | TOR | — | High evidence | 20 | 45 | 48 | 17 | — | 61 | — | — | 68 | 63 | 60 |
What teams depended on him for
Seasons where a team's situation report named him a dependency case.IND did not have a sufficiently supported observed replacement lineup for Pascal Siakam. The database keeps the functional-loss evidence but does not invent a replacement plan.
Replacement evidence
No replacement lineup is supported by the available evidence.
on floor 3754 possessions · off floor 3441 possessions
IND was highly dependent on Pascal Siakam. Removing him cost about 27.9% of interior finish production, and lineups with him performed 12.0 points per 100 possessions better than lineups without him. The best supported replacement group was [Myles Turner, Andrew Nembhard, Obi Toppin, Tyrese Haliburton, Aaron Nesmith] over 250 possessions.
Replacement evidence
Myles Turner · Andrew Nembhard · Obi Toppin · Tyrese Haliburton · Aaron Nesmith
shrunk net 0.2280 over 250 possessions
on floor 6027 possessions · off floor 3162 possessions
IND did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on Pascal Siakam.
Replacement evidence
Myles Turner · Buddy Hield · Bruce Brown · Obi Toppin · Tyrese Haliburton
shrunk net 6.5370 over 352 possessions
on floor 3482 possessions · off floor 5335 possessions
TOR did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on Pascal Siakam.
Replacement evidence
Jakob Poeltl · Gary Trent Jr. · RJ Barrett · Immanuel Quickley · Scottie Barnes
shrunk net 3.1090 over 320 possessions
on floor 2499 possessions · off floor 4862 possessions
TOR did not have a sufficiently supported observed replacement lineup for Pascal Siakam. The database keeps the functional-loss evidence but does not invent a replacement plan.
Replacement evidence
No replacement lineup is supported by the available evidence.
on floor 4821 possessions · off floor 2364 possessions
TOR was highly dependent on Pascal Siakam. Removing him cost about 25.3% of passing production, and lineups with him performed 5.9 points per 100 possessions better than lineups without him. The best supported replacement group was [Fred VanVleet, OG Anunoby, Gary Trent Jr., Precious Achiuwa, Scottie Barnes] over 296 possessions.
Replacement evidence
Fred VanVleet · OG Anunoby · Gary Trent Jr. · Precious Achiuwa · Scottie Barnes
shrunk net 2.8490 over 296 possessions
on floor 4967 possessions · off floor 2569 possessions
TOR did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on Pascal Siakam.
Replacement evidence
No replacement lineup is supported by the available evidence.
on floor 3679 possessions · off floor 2721 possessions
TOR lineups performed 4.6 points per 100 possessions better with Pascal Siakam than without him. The best supported alternative was [Kyle Lowry, Serge Ibaka, Patrick McCaw, Fred VanVleet, OG Anunoby] over 252 possessions.
Replacement evidence
Kyle Lowry · Serge Ibaka · Patrick McCaw · Fred VanVleet · OG Anunoby
shrunk net -2.7670 over 252 possessions
on floor 4576 possessions · off floor 2652 possessions
TOR did not have a sufficiently supported observed replacement lineup for Pascal Siakam. The database keeps the functional-loss evidence but does not invent a replacement plan.
Replacement evidence
No replacement lineup is supported by the available evidence.
on floor 6313 possessions · off floor 3123 possessions
TOR had a supported lineup path without Pascal Siakam: [Kyle Lowry, Serge Ibaka, DeMar DeRozan, Jonas Valanciunas, OG Anunoby] at 7.3 adjusted net points per 100 possessions over 1793 possessions. This is an observed option, not proof it is universally better.
Replacement evidence
Kyle Lowry · Serge Ibaka · DeMar DeRozan · Jonas Valanciunas · OG Anunoby
shrunk net 7.3280 over 1793 possessions
on floor 3274 possessions · off floor 4728 possessions
TOR had a supported lineup path without Pascal Siakam: [Kyle Lowry, DeMar DeRozan, DeMarre Carroll, Patrick Patterson, Jonas Valanciunas] at 7.6 adjusted net points per 100 possessions over 253 possessions. This is an observed option, not proof it is universally better.
Replacement evidence
Kyle Lowry · DeMar DeRozan · DeMarre Carroll · Patrick Patterson · Jonas Valanciunas
shrunk net 7.6090 over 253 possessions
on floor 1587 possessions · off floor 6215 possessions
Known contract calendar
Governed contract events naming this player — dates carry their honest quality.Pascal Siakam has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2028 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. The player is inside the two-season extension-review horizon, but exact eligibility and value are not certified.
Pascal Siakam has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2028 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. No extension-review trigger is applied yet.
Pascal Siakam has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2024 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. The player is inside the two-season extension-review horizon, but exact eligibility and value are not certified.
Pascal Siakam has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2024 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. The player is inside the two-season extension-review horizon, but exact eligibility and value are not certified.
Pascal Siakam has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2024 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. No extension-review trigger is applied yet.
Pascal Siakam has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2020 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. The player is inside the two-season extension-review horizon, but exact eligibility and value are not certified.
Pascal Siakam has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2020 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. The player is inside the two-season extension-review horizon, but exact eligibility and value are not certified.
Pascal Siakam has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2020 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. The player is inside the two-season extension-review horizon, but exact eligibility and value are not certified.
Pascal Siakam has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2020 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. No extension-review trigger is applied yet.
Function scores, roles, dependence records and contract events are separate evidence. No combined player value, trade value or ranking is computed from them, and none of them is a causal impact claim.