Patrick Beverley
What does Patrick Beverley actually supply on the floor?
Patrick Beverley's strongest evidenced functions are passing, creation, rim protection; the weakest available areas are interior finishing, rim pressure, shooting. These are full-season values across multiple teams, so team-specific fit is withheld.
Function profile
2023-24 — eleven separate readings on a league scale. They are not additive.* limited evidence for that function. A dash means the evidence was insufficient — not a zero. Use the separate function strengths to evaluate role and roster fit; do not treat them as one player-value score. POA or switch conclusions require lineup, matchup, and assignment evidence beyond this profile.
Season by season
Every governed season profile on record.| Season | Team | Role | Evidence | Creation | Rim pressure | Shooting | Passing | Screening | Interior finish | Point of attack | Switch coverage | Rim protection | Event creation | Rebounding |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-24 | — | — | High evidence | 62 | 46 | 48 | 64 | — | 16 | — | — | 57 | 55 | 48 |
| 2022-23 | — | — | High evidence | 55 | 38 | 46 | 61 | — | 15 | — | — | 45 | 68 | 48 |
| 2021-22 | MIN | — | High evidence | 77 | 51 | 57 | 83 | — | 33 | 60 | 61 | 56 | 76 | 47 |
| 2020-21 | LAC | — | Mixed coverage | 51 | 43 | 67 | 55 | — | 22 | 50 | 54 | 48 | 63 | 38 |
| 2019-20 | LAC | — | High evidence | 66 | 42 | 67 | 65 | — | 16 | — | — | 46 | 69 | 49 |
| 2018-19 | LAC | — | High evidence | 66 | 38 | 73 | 69 | — | 18 | — | — | 51 | 58 | 47 |
| 2017-18 | LAC | — | Mixed coverage | 53 | 49 | 59 | 52 | — | 31 | — | — | 52 | 69 | 49 |
| 2016-17 | HOU | — | High evidence | 69 | 45 | 69 | 72 | — | 20 | — | — | 39 | 73 | 48 |
| 2015-16 | HOU | — | Limited evidence | 72 | 51 | 75 | 70 | — | — | — | — | 48 | 72 | — |
| 2014-15 | HOU | — | Limited evidence | 67 | 51 | 61 | 66 | — | — | — | — | 43 | 58 | — |
| 2013-14 | HOU | — | Limited evidence | 61 | 56 | 63 | 60 | — | — | — | — | 57 | 71 | — |
What teams depended on him for
Seasons where a team's situation report named him a dependency case.MIL did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on Patrick Beverley.
Replacement evidence
Brook Lopez · Damian Lillard · Khris Middleton · Giannis Antetokounmpo · Malik Beasley
shrunk net 11.2020 over 1186 possessions
on floor 1297 possessions · off floor 6451 possessions
PHI did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on Patrick Beverley.
Replacement evidence
Nicolas Batum · Tobias Harris · Joel Embiid · De'Anthony Melton · Tyrese Maxey
shrunk net 14.9540 over 396 possessions
on floor 1606 possessions · off floor 6014 possessions
CHI did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on Patrick Beverley.
Replacement evidence
DeMar DeRozan · Andre Drummond · Coby White · Patrick Williams · Ayo Dosunmu
shrunk net 5.1920 over 242 possessions
on floor 1163 possessions · off floor 6298 possessions
LAL did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on Patrick Beverley.
Replacement evidence
LeBron James · Anthony Davis · Dennis Schroder · Rui Hachimura · Austin Reaves
shrunk net 5.3160 over 175 possessions
on floor 2166 possessions · off floor 6579 possessions
MIN had a supported lineup path without Patrick Beverley: [D'Angelo Russell, Karl-Anthony Towns, Malik Beasley, Anthony Edwards, Jaden McDaniels] at 4.9 adjusted net points per 100 possessions over 226 possessions. This is an observed option, not proof it is universally better.
Replacement evidence
D'Angelo Russell · Karl-Anthony Towns · Malik Beasley · Anthony Edwards · Jaden McDaniels
shrunk net 4.9330 over 226 possessions
on floor 3180 possessions · off floor 4850 possessions
LAC had a supported lineup path without Patrick Beverley: [Serge Ibaka, Nicolas Batum, Paul George, Kawhi Leonard, Reggie Jackson] at 7.9 adjusted net points per 100 possessions over 154 possessions. This is an observed option, not proof it is universally better.
Replacement evidence
Serge Ibaka · Nicolas Batum · Paul George · Kawhi Leonard · Reggie Jackson
shrunk net 7.8880 over 154 possessions
on floor 2031 possessions · off floor 5751 possessions
LAC lineups performed 6.5 points per 100 possessions better with Patrick Beverley than without him. The best supported alternative was [Paul George, Marcus Morris Sr., Kawhi Leonard, Ivica Zubac, Landry Shamet] over 214 possessions.
Replacement evidence
Paul George · Marcus Morris Sr. · Kawhi Leonard · Ivica Zubac · Landry Shamet
shrunk net 3.5920 over 214 possessions
on floor 2758 possessions · off floor 4861 possessions
LAC did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on Patrick Beverley.
Replacement evidence
Danilo Gallinari · Avery Bradley · Tobias Harris · Boban Marjanovic · Shai Gilgeous-Alexander
shrunk net 1.4950 over 161 possessions
on floor 4306 possessions · off floor 3649 possessions
LAC had a supported lineup path without Patrick Beverley: [Lou Williams, DeAndre Jordan, Tobias Harris, Austin Rivers, Sindarius Thornwell] at 3.7 adjusted net points per 100 possessions over 297 possessions. This is an observed option, not proof it is universally better.
Replacement evidence
Lou Williams · DeAndre Jordan · Tobias Harris · Austin Rivers · Sindarius Thornwell
shrunk net 3.7410 over 297 possessions
on floor 594 possessions · off floor 6580 possessions
HOU lineups performed 4.6 points per 100 possessions better with Patrick Beverley than without him. The best supported alternative was [Nene Hilario, Trevor Ariza, Lou Williams, Eric Gordon, James Harden] over 258 possessions.
Replacement evidence
Nene Hilario · Trevor Ariza · Lou Williams · Eric Gordon · James Harden
shrunk net 6.1650 over 258 possessions
on floor 4491 possessions · off floor 3937 possessions
HOU did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on Patrick Beverley.
Replacement evidence
No replacement lineup is supported by the available evidence.
on floor 3882 possessions · off floor 3684 possessions
HOU did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on Patrick Beverley.
Replacement evidence
Dwight Howard · Josh Smith · Trevor Ariza · Corey Brewer · Pablo Prigioni
shrunk net 5.8020 over 164 possessions
on floor 3091 possessions · off floor 5495 possessions
HOU did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on Patrick Beverley.
Replacement evidence
Omer Asik · James Harden · Jeremy Lin · Chandler Parsons · Terrence Jones
shrunk net 3.0730 over 216 possessions
on floor 3440 possessions · off floor 4125 possessions
Known contract calendar
Governed contract events naming this player — dates carry their honest quality.Patrick Beverley has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2022 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. The player is inside the two-season extension-review horizon, but exact eligibility and value are not certified.
Patrick Beverley has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2022 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. The player is inside the two-season extension-review horizon, but exact eligibility and value are not certified.
Patrick Beverley has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2022 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. The player is inside the two-season extension-review horizon, but exact eligibility and value are not certified.
Patrick Beverley has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2019 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. The player is inside the two-season extension-review horizon, but exact eligibility and value are not certified.
Patrick Beverley has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2019 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. The player is inside the two-season extension-review horizon, but exact eligibility and value are not certified.
Function scores, roles, dependence records and contract events are separate evidence. No combined player value, trade value or ranking is computed from them, and none of them is a causal impact claim.