
Talen Horton-Tucker
What does Talen Horton-Tucker actually supply on the floor?
Talen Horton-Tucker's strongest evidenced functions are rim pressure, creation, rebounding; the weakest available areas are interior finishing, rim protection, event creation. The profile is tied to CHI for 2024-25.
Function profile
2024-25 — eleven separate readings on a league scale. They are not additive.* limited evidence for that function. A dash means the evidence was insufficient — not a zero. Use the separate function strengths to evaluate role and roster fit; do not treat them as one player-value score. POA or switch conclusions require lineup, matchup, and assignment evidence beyond this profile.
Season by season
Every governed season profile on record.| Season | Team | Role | Evidence | Creation | Rim pressure | Shooting | Passing | Screening | Interior finish | Point of attack | Switch coverage | Rim protection | Event creation | Rebounding |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-25 | CHI | — | Mixed coverage | 53 | 56 | 46 | 48 | — | 35 | 57 | 62 | 43 | 44 | 50 |
| 2023-24 | UTA | — | Mixed coverage | 64 | 49 | 45 | 65 | — | 41 | 36 | 39 | 53 | 69 | 41 |
| 2022-23 | UTA | — | High evidence | 77 | 52 | 39 | 77 | — | 28 | 43 | 45 | 54 | 59 | 45 |
| 2021-22 | LAL | — | High evidence | 66 | 54 | 37 | 66 | 45 | 47 | 42 | 43 | 51 | 63 | 40 |
| 2020-21 | LAL | — | High evidence | 66 | 55 | 38 | 66 | — | 47 | 57 | 52 | 49 | 71 | 30 |
| 2019-20 | LAL | — | Mixed coverage | 47 | 52 | 49 | 44 | — | 46 | — | — | 48 | 59 | 49 |
What teams depended on him for
Seasons where a team's situation report named him a dependency case.CHI lineups performed 3.3 points per 100 possessions better with Talen Horton-Tucker than without him. The best supported alternative was [Nikola Vucevic, Zach LaVine, Lonzo Ball, Patrick Williams, Josh Giddey] over 150 possessions.
Replacement evidence
Nikola Vucevic · Zach LaVine · Lonzo Ball · Patrick Williams · Josh Giddey
shrunk net 2.3580 over 150 possessions
on floor 1404 possessions · off floor 6155 possessions
UTA had a supported lineup path without Talen Horton-Tucker: [Kris Dunn, Lauri Markkanen, John Collins, Collin Sexton, Simone Fontecchio] at 3.4 adjusted net points per 100 possessions over 525 possessions. This is an observed option, not proof it is universally better.
Replacement evidence
Kris Dunn · Lauri Markkanen · John Collins · Collin Sexton · Simone Fontecchio
shrunk net 3.4340 over 525 possessions
on floor 1861 possessions · off floor 5529 possessions
UTA did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on Talen Horton-Tucker.
Replacement evidence
Kelly Olynyk · Jordan Clarkson · Lauri Markkanen · Collin Sexton · Jarred Vanderbilt
shrunk net 4.4070 over 258 possessions
on floor 2463 possessions · off floor 4870 possessions
LAL had a supported lineup path without Talen Horton-Tucker: [LeBron James, Russell Westbrook, Avery Bradley, Stanley Johnson, Malik Monk] at 2.4 adjusted net points per 100 possessions over 169 possessions. This is an observed option, not proof it is universally better.
Replacement evidence
LeBron James · Russell Westbrook · Avery Bradley · Stanley Johnson · Malik Monk
shrunk net 2.3920 over 169 possessions
on floor 2735 possessions · off floor 4652 possessions
LAL did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on Talen Horton-Tucker.
Replacement evidence
LeBron James · Marc Gasol · Anthony Davis · Dennis Schroder · Kentavious Caldwell-Pope
shrunk net 4.7710 over 572 possessions
on floor 2448 possessions · off floor 4521 possessions
LAL did not have enough resolved lineup possessions involving Talen Horton-Tucker for a dependable replacement conclusion.
Replacement evidence
LeBron James · JaVale McGee · Danny Green · Avery Bradley · Anthony Davis
shrunk net 8.3920 over 775 possessions
on floor 197 possessions · off floor 7792 possessions
Known contract calendar
Governed contract events naming this player — dates carry their honest quality.No governed contract-calendar events name this player.
Function scores, roles, dependence records and contract events are separate evidence. No combined player value, trade value or ranking is computed from them, and none of them is a causal impact claim.