← Player Board
Trae Young
Player Dossier

Trae Young

Multiple teams · 2025-26Franchise engineMixed coverage
Pick-and-roll handler · Primary creator · Helper / rotator

What does Trae Young actually supply on the floor?

Trae Young's strongest evidenced functions are passing, creation, rim pressure; the weakest available areas are rim protection, interior finishing, event creation. These are full-season values across multiple teams, so team-specific fit is withheld.

Function profile

2025-26 — eleven separate readings on a league scale. They are not additive.
Creation59
Rim pressure57
Shooting*53
Passing60
Screening*
Interior finish38
Point of attack*
Switch coverage*
Rim protection*37
Event creation42
Rebounding*50

* limited evidence for that function. A dash means the evidence was insufficient — not a zero. Use the separate function strengths to evaluate role and roster fit; do not treat them as one player-value score. POA or switch conclusions require lineup, matchup, and assignment evidence beyond this profile.

Season by season

Every governed season profile on record.
SeasonTeamRoleEvidenceCreationRim pressureShootingPassingScreeningInterior finishPoint of attackSwitch coverageRim protectionEvent creationRebounding
2025-26Franchise engineMixed coverage5957536038374250
2024-25ATLHigh evidence78485179324242294437
2023-24ATLHigh evidence78466278184648325432
2022-23ATLHigh evidence85525386315456284942
2021-22ATLHigh evidence79537378303849304239
2020-21ATLHigh evidence81525181204644313341
2019-20ATLHigh evidence9250619019244133
2018-19ATLHigh evidence8052438143243933

What teams depended on him for

Seasons where a team's situation report named him a dependency case.
ATL · 2025-26Player function-loss evidence unavailable

ATL did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on Trae Young.

Replacement evidence
Best observed five without him

CJ McCollum · Nickeil Alexander-Walker · Onyeka Okongwu · Jalen Johnson · Dyson Daniels

shrunk net 7.8390 over 924 possessions

on floor 573 possessions · off floor 7339 possessions

WAS · 2025-26Player lineup sample too small

WAS did not have enough resolved lineup possessions involving Trae Young for a dependable replacement conclusion.

Replacement evidence
Best observed five without him

Khris Middleton · CJ McCollum · Bilal Coulibaly · Alex Sarr · Tre Johnson

shrunk net 0.4650 over 171 possessions

on floor 198 possessions · off floor 7235 possessions

ATL · 2024-25Player function-loss evidence unavailable

ATL did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on Trae Young.

rotation 69%
Replacement evidence

No replacement lineup is supported by the available evidence.

on floor 5437 possessions · off floor 2238 possessions

ATL · 2023-24Single-skill dependence

ATL did not have strong functional backup for Trae Young in passing; removing him cost about 25.4% of the team's production in that area. The next observed option was Dejounte Murray.

rotation 49%loses 25.4% of passing
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without him

Clint Capela · Bogdan Bogdanovic · Dejounte Murray · De'Andre Hunter · Vit Krejci

shrunk net 4.1670 over 279 possessions

on floor 3910 possessions · off floor 3668 possessions

ATL · 2022-23Single-skill dependence

ATL did not have strong functional backup for Trae Young in passing; removing him cost about 42.3% of the team's production in that area. The next observed option was Dejounte Murray.

rotation 65%loses 42.3% of passing
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without him

Bogdan Bogdanovic · Dejounte Murray · Onyeka Okongwu · Jalen Johnson · AJ Griffin

shrunk net 1.2470 over 235 possessions

on floor 5392 possessions · off floor 2711 possessions

ATL · 2021-22Single-skill dependence

ATL did not have strong functional backup for Trae Young in creation; removing him cost about 47.0% of the team's production in that area. The next observed option was Kevin Huerter.

rotation 68%loses 47.0% of creation
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without him

Lou Williams · Danilo Gallinari · Bogdan Bogdanovic · Delon Wright · Onyeka Okongwu

shrunk net 7.0920 over 218 possessions

on floor 5251 possessions · off floor 2389 possessions

ATL · 2020-21Player function-loss evidence unavailable

ATL did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on Trae Young.

rotation 63%
Replacement evidence

No replacement lineup is supported by the available evidence.

on floor 4955 possessions · off floor 2857 possessions

ATL · 2019-20No supported replacement lineup sample

ATL did not have a sufficiently supported observed replacement lineup for Trae Young. The database keeps the functional-loss evidence but does not invent a replacement plan.

rotation 65%loses 50.2% of creation
Replacement evidence

No replacement lineup is supported by the available evidence.

on floor 3878 possessions · off floor 2020 possessions

ATL · 2018-19No supported replacement lineup sample

ATL did not have a sufficiently supported observed replacement lineup for Trae Young. The database keeps the functional-loss evidence but does not invent a replacement plan.

rotation 63%loses 37.6% of passing
Replacement evidence

No replacement lineup is supported by the available evidence.

on floor 4828 possessions · off floor 2787 possessions

Known contract calendar

Governed contract events naming this player — dates carry their honest quality.
ATL · 2024-25Contract control horizonJun 30, 2027

Trae Young has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2027 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. The player is inside the two-season extension-review horizon, but exact eligibility and value are not certified.

ATL · 2023-24Contract control horizonJun 30, 2027

Trae Young has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2027 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. No extension-review trigger is applied yet.

Function scores, roles, dependence records and contract events are separate evidence. No combined player value, trade value or ranking is computed from them, and none of them is a causal impact claim.