Player Dossier

Tre Jones

CHI · 2025-26Rotation connectorHigh evidence

Connective passer · Pick-and-roll handler · Point-of-attack defender

What does Tre Jones actually supply on the floor?

Tre Jones's strongest evidenced functions are rim pressure, creation, passing; the weakest available areas are rim protection, interior finishing, rebounding. The profile is tied to CHI for 2025-26.

Function profile

2025-26 — eleven separate readings on a league scale. They are not additive.

Creation66

Rim pressure68

Shooting49

Passing63

Screening*—

Interior finish42

Point of attack*—

Switch coverage*—

Rim protection29

Event creation55

Rebounding44

* limited evidence for that function. A dash means the evidence was insufficient — not a zero. Use the separate function strengths to evaluate role and roster fit; do not treat them as one player-value score. POA or switch conclusions require lineup, matchup, and assignment evidence beyond this profile.

Season by season

Every governed season profile on record.

Season	Team	Role	Evidence	Creation	Rim pressure	Shooting	Passing	Screening	Interior finish	Point of attack	Switch coverage	Rim protection	Event creation	Rebounding
2025-26	CHI	Rotation connector	High evidence	66	68	49	63	—	42	—	—	29	55	44
2024-25	—	—	Mixed coverage	68	56	53	71	—	28	—	—	41	58	51
2023-24	SAS	—	High evidence	67	63	48	70	52	48	44	42	29	52	47
2022-23	SAS	—	High evidence	75	48	33	75	—	23	54	49	32	65	39
2021-22	SAS	—	High evidence	69	58	42	68	—	36	48	46	39	56	42
2020-21	SAS	—	Mixed coverage	63	54	52	59	—	39	—	—	39	44	55

What teams depended on him for

Seasons where a team's situation report named him a dependency case.

CHI · 2025-26Player function-loss evidence unavailable

CHI did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on Tre Jones.

rotation 45%

Replacement evidence

Best observed five without him

Nikola Vucevic · Coby White · Isaac Okoro · Josh Giddey · Matas Buzelis

shrunk net 0.2440 over 213 possessions

on floor 3409 possessions · off floor 4077 possessions

SAS · 2024-25Player function-loss evidence unavailable

SAS did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on Tre Jones.

Replacement evidence

Best observed five without him

Chris Paul · Harrison Barnes · Devin Vassell · Jeremy Sochan · Victor Wembanyama

shrunk net 4.7280 over 263 possessions

on floor 825 possessions · off floor 6373 possessions

CHI · 2024-25Player function-loss evidence unavailable

CHI did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on Tre Jones.

Replacement evidence

Best observed five without him

Nikola Vucevic · Zach LaVine · Lonzo Ball · Patrick Williams · Josh Giddey

shrunk net 2.3580 over 150 possessions

on floor 845 possessions · off floor 6722 possessions

SAS · 2023-24Lineup performance dependence

SAS lineups performed 10.1 points per 100 possessions better with Tre Jones than without him. The best supported alternative was [Keldon Johnson, Devin Vassell, Malaki Branham, Jeremy Sochan, Victor Wembanyama] over 213 possessions.

rotation 54%loses 17.1% of passing

Replacement evidence

Best observed five without him

Keldon Johnson · Devin Vassell · Malaki Branham · Jeremy Sochan · Victor Wembanyama

shrunk net -0.5550 over 213 possessions

on floor 4058 possessions · off floor 3486 possessions

SAS · 2022-23No supported replacement lineup sample

SAS did not have a sufficiently supported observed replacement lineup for Tre Jones. The database keeps the functional-loss evidence but does not invent a replacement plan.

rotation 50%loses 27.5% of passing

Replacement evidence

No replacement lineup is supported by the available evidence.

on floor 3693 possessions · off floor 3673 possessions

SAS · 2021-22Observed replacement lineup exists

SAS had a supported lineup path without Tre Jones: [Doug McDermott, Dejounte Murray, Jakob Poeltl, Derrick White, Keldon Johnson] at 2.7 adjusted net points per 100 possessions over 619 possessions. This is an observed option, not proof it is universally better.

rotation 29%loses 11.8% of passing

Replacement evidence

Best observed five without him

Doug McDermott · Dejounte Murray · Jakob Poeltl · Derrick White · Keldon Johnson

shrunk net 2.6620 over 619 possessions

on floor 2095 possessions · off floor 5267 possessions

SAS · 2020-21Observed replacement lineup exists

SAS had a supported lineup path without Tre Jones: [Rudy Gay, Patty Mills, Dejounte Murray, Jakob Poeltl, Devin Vassell] at 9.0 adjusted net points per 100 possessions over 225 possessions. This is an observed option, not proof it is universally better.

rotation 8%loses 2.4% of creation

Replacement evidence

Best observed five without him

Rudy Gay · Patty Mills · Dejounte Murray · Jakob Poeltl · Devin Vassell

shrunk net 8.9660 over 225 possessions

on floor 472 possessions · off floor 5932 possessions

Known contract calendar

Governed contract events naming this player — dates carry their honest quality.

CHI · 2025-26Contract control horizonJun 30, 2028

Tre Jones has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2028 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. The player is inside the two-season extension-review horizon, but exact eligibility and value are not certified.

SAS · 2023-24Contract control horizonJun 30, 2025

Tre Jones has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2025 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. The player is inside the two-season extension-review horizon, but exact eligibility and value are not certified.

Function scores, roles, dependence records and contract events are separate evidence. No combined player value, trade value or ranking is computed from them, and none of them is a causal impact claim.