← Player Board
Tre Mann
Player Dossier

Tre Mann

CHO · 2025-26Bench creatorMixed coverage
Pick-and-roll handler · Secondary creator · Helper / rotator

What does Tre Mann actually supply on the floor?

Tre Mann's strongest evidenced functions are event creation, creation, passing; the weakest available areas are interior finishing, rim protection, rim pressure. The profile is tied to CHO for 2025-26.

Function profile

2025-26 — eleven separate readings on a league scale. They are not additive.
Creation52
Rim pressure42
Shooting45
Passing46
Screening*
Interior finish19
Point of attack*
Switch coverage*
Rim protection38
Event creation53
Rebounding44

* limited evidence for that function. A dash means the evidence was insufficient — not a zero. Use the separate function strengths to evaluate role and roster fit; do not treat them as one player-value score. POA or switch conclusions require lineup, matchup, and assignment evidence beyond this profile.

Season by season

Every governed season profile on record.
SeasonTeamRoleEvidenceCreationRim pressureShootingPassingScreeningInterior finishPoint of attackSwitch coverageRim protectionEvent creationRebounding
2025-26CHOBench creatorMixed coverage5242454619385344
2024-25CHOMixed coverage58535952455253513838
2023-24Mixed coverage7048577116376540
2022-23OKCMixed coverage6045415645315458415743
2021-22OKCHigh evidence42435733204750385545

What teams depended on him for

Seasons where a team's situation report named him a dependency case.
CHO · 2025-26Observed replacement lineup exists

CHO had a supported lineup path without Tre Mann: [Miles Bridges, LaMelo Ball, Moussa Diabate, Brandon Miller, Kon Knueppel] at 14.5 adjusted net points per 100 possessions over 988 possessions. This is an observed option, not proof it is universally better.

rotation 17%loses 6.3% of event creation
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without him

Miles Bridges · LaMelo Ball · Moussa Diabate · Brandon Miller · Kon Knueppel

shrunk net 14.5160 over 988 possessions

on floor 1163 possessions · off floor 5948 possessions

CHO · 2024-25Lineup performance dependence

CHO lineups performed 7.4 points per 100 possessions better with Tre Mann than without him. The best supported alternative was [Miles Bridges, LaMelo Ball, Josh Green, Mark Williams, Brandon Miller] over 152 possessions.

rotation 8%loses 3.4% of creation
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without him

Miles Bridges · LaMelo Ball · Josh Green · Mark Williams · Brandon Miller

shrunk net 0.6810 over 152 possessions

on floor 556 possessions · off floor 6515 possessions

OKC · 2023-24Player lineup sample too small

OKC did not have enough resolved lineup possessions involving Tre Mann for a dependable replacement conclusion.

Replacement evidence
Best observed five without him

Shai Gilgeous-Alexander · Luguentz Dort · Josh Giddey · Chet Holmgren · Jalen Williams

shrunk net 8.6390 over 1769 possessions

on floor 221 possessions · off floor 7793 possessions

CHO · 2023-24Player function-loss evidence unavailable

CHO did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on Tre Mann.

Replacement evidence
Best observed five without him

Gordon Hayward · P.J. Washington · LaMelo Ball · Mark Williams · Brandon Miller

shrunk net 1.1180 over 151 possessions

on floor 1585 possessions · off floor 5554 possessions

OKC · 2022-23Replacement lineup exists, with a performance cost

OKC had an observed replacement lineup for Tre Mann, but it came with a performance cost. The supported alternative was [Shai Gilgeous-Alexander, Luguentz Dort, Josh Giddey, Jalen Williams, Jaylin Williams] at -0.4 adjusted net points per 100 possessions over 598 possessions.

rotation 29%loses 7.8% of creation
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without him

Shai Gilgeous-Alexander · Luguentz Dort · Josh Giddey · Jalen Williams · Jaylin Williams

shrunk net -0.4420 over 598 possessions

on floor 2166 possessions · off floor 5299 possessions

OKC · 2021-22Replacement lineup exists, with a performance cost

OKC had an observed replacement lineup for Tre Mann, but it came with a performance cost. The supported alternative was [Shai Gilgeous-Alexander, Luguentz Dort, Jeremiah Robinson-Earl, Josh Giddey, Aaron Wiggins] at -4.1 adjusted net points per 100 possessions over 249 possessions.

rotation 34%loses 7.6% of event creation
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without him

Shai Gilgeous-Alexander · Luguentz Dort · Jeremiah Robinson-Earl · Josh Giddey · Aaron Wiggins

shrunk net -4.0730 over 249 possessions

on floor 2495 possessions · off floor 4743 possessions

Known contract calendar

Governed contract events naming this player — dates carry their honest quality.
CHO · 2025-26Team option decisionJun 29, 2027Outside date, not a contract deadline

Tre Mann has a reported team option for the 2028 season. Team controls the option. The stored date is the CBA outside date; the contract may require an earlier decision.

CHO · 2025-26Contract control horizonJun 30, 2028

Tre Mann has a reported contract-control horizon through the 2028 season. The June 30 date is a season-boundary planning proxy, not proof of exact free-agency status. The player is inside the two-season extension-review horizon, but exact eligibility and value are not certified.

Function scores, roles, dependence records and contract events are separate evidence. No combined player value, trade value or ranking is computed from them, and none of them is a causal impact claim.