Player Dossier

Vince Williams Jr.

Multiple teams · 2025-26Rotation connectorHigh evidence

Connective passer · Spot-up spacer · Event creator · Point-of-attack defender · Switch wing

What does Vince Williams Jr. actually supply on the floor?

Vince Williams Jr.'s strongest evidenced functions are passing, creation, event creation; the weakest available areas are interior finishing, shooting, rim pressure. These are full-season values across multiple teams, so team-specific fit is withheld.

Function profile

2025-26 — eleven separate readings on a league scale. They are not additive.

Creation72

Rim pressure45

Shooting41

Passing77

Screening*—

Interior finish35

Point of attack*—

Switch coverage*—

Rim protection55

Event creation56

Rebounding52

* limited evidence for that function. A dash means the evidence was insufficient — not a zero. Use the separate function strengths to evaluate role and roster fit; do not treat them as one player-value score. POA or switch conclusions require lineup, matchup, and assignment evidence beyond this profile.

Season by season

Every governed season profile on record.

Season	Team	Role	Evidence	Creation	Rim pressure	Shooting	Passing	Screening	Interior finish	Point of attack	Switch coverage	Rim protection	Event creation	Rebounding
2025-26	—	Rotation connector	High evidence	72	45	41	77	—	35	—	—	55	56	52
2024-25	MEM	—	Mixed coverage	52	55	40	54	—	63	42	38	43	37	56
2023-24	MEM	—	High evidence	62	55	57	65	—	56	36	38	65	59	46
2022-23	MEM	—	Mixed coverage	42	47	45	40	—	46	—	—	51	61	50

What teams depended on him for

Seasons where a team's situation report named him a dependency case.

MEM · 2025-26Player function-loss evidence unavailable

MEM did not have enough reliable function-loss evidence to judge dependence on Vince Williams Jr..

Replacement evidence

Best observed five without him

Kentavious Caldwell-Pope · Jock Landale · Santi Aldama · Cam Spencer · Jaylen Wells

shrunk net 3.0510 over 160 possessions

on floor 1303 possessions · off floor 5830 possessions

UTA · 2025-26Player lineup sample too small

UTA did not have enough resolved lineup possessions involving Vince Williams Jr. for a dependable replacement conclusion.

Replacement evidence

Best observed five without him

Jusuf Nurkic · Lauri Markkanen · Svi Mykhailiuk · Keyonte George · Ace Bailey

shrunk net -2.7180 over 377 possessions

on floor 160 possessions · off floor 7315 possessions

MEM · 2024-25Observed replacement lineup exists

MEM had a supported lineup path without Vince Williams Jr.: [Jaren Jackson Jr., Ja Morant, Desmond Bane, Zach Edey, Jaylen Wells] at 12.9 adjusted net points per 100 possessions over 470 possessions. This is an observed option, not proof it is universally better.

rotation 13%loses 4.3% of interior finish

Replacement evidence

Best observed five without him

Jaren Jackson Jr. · Ja Morant · Desmond Bane · Zach Edey · Jaylen Wells

shrunk net 12.8860 over 470 possessions

on floor 1007 possessions · off floor 6881 possessions

MEM · 2022-23Player lineup sample too small

MEM did not have enough resolved lineup possessions involving Vince Williams Jr. for a dependable replacement conclusion.

rotation 2%loses 0.6% of event creation

Replacement evidence

Best observed five without him

Steven Adams · Dillon Brooks · Jaren Jackson Jr. · Ja Morant · John Konchar

shrunk net 4.8460 over 328 possessions

on floor 200 possessions · off floor 7785 possessions

Known contract calendar

Governed contract events naming this player — dates carry their honest quality.

No governed contract-calendar events name this player.

Function scores, roles, dependence records and contract events are separate evidence. No combined player value, trade value or ranking is computed from them, and none of them is a causal impact claim.