← Team Metrics
Latest
Los Angeles Lakers
2023-24Latest available releaseLive database
When several roster decisions share a planning window, where do basketball, roster, reported salary, cap, trade, exception and draft constraints overlap?
LAL has 1 multi-player planning windows and 32 fully enumerated conditional branch combinations. Overlap counts identify review pressure, not preferred outcomes.
Anthony Davis + Cam Reddish + Christian Wood + D'Angelo Russell + Jaxson Hayes
A planning window — decisions sharing a staff planning date, never a claimed simultaneous deadline.LAL has 5 actionable player decisions sharing the 2024-06-29 planning anchor. All 32 bounded branch combinations are enumerated for stress testing, but the anchor is not claimed as an exact simultaneous contract deadline.
5 decisions32 enumerated combinationsanchor Jun 29, 2024reported exposure $69.9Msimultaneous execution not claimed
Multi-decision planning window — exact deadlines unresolvedTax pressure review triggered
Compare
Two combinations side by side — differences, not a verdict.| A — keeps 3, exits 2 | B — keeps 4, exits 1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Branches | Decline option ×2 · Exercise option ×3 | Decline option ×1 · Exercise option ×4 |
| Basketball | 4 supported dependence case(s) · 1 withheld · 1 critical | 4 supported dependence case(s) · 1 withheld · 1 critical |
| Roster spots | 3 stay occupied · 2 may open | 4 stay occupied · 1 may open |
| Reported salary | 3 retained ($64.9M) · 2 with unknown salary effect | 4 retained ($26.7M) · 1 with unknown salary effect |
| Current cap context | Tax pressure review triggered | Tax pressure review triggered |
| Trade / execution | Simultaneous execution not claimed | Simultaneous execution not claimed |
| Exception reference | 0 visible · 5 withheld | 0 visible · 5 withheld |
| Draft capital | 5 visible · 0 withheld | 5 visible · 0 withheld |
Neither combination is a recommendation. Clear comparison
Scenario explorer
Every enumerated combination, grouped by what it does to the roster. None is recommended. 32 combinations — open a group to read them.Retain or continue all1 combination
LAL scenario 0 keeps or continues 5 decisions and exits or defers 0. It exposes overlapping planning work, not a recommended or legally executable roster plan.
Exercise option ×5
Planning scenario — some salary, basketball or asset evidence is missing
Constraint lanes and evidence gaps
Basketball: 4 supported dependence case(s) · 1 withheld · 1 criticalRoster spots: 5 stay occupiedReported salary: 5 retained ($69.9M)Current cap context: Tax pressure review triggeredFuture cap: Future salary, tax, apron and cap room require a fresh calculationCBA legality: Combined CBA legality of executing these decisions together is unresolvedMarket price: Market price, counterparty willingness and replacement cost are unresolvedException reference: 0 visible · 5 withheldDraft capital: 5 visible · 0 withheldProbability: No probability estimated
Named evidence gaps
- Exact decision timing unresolved
- Current exception wallet unavailable
- Combined cba legality unresolved
- Scenario probability not estimated
- Basketball outcome not evaluated
Mixed keep-and-exit combination30 combinations
LAL scenario 1 keeps or continues 4 decisions and exits or defers 1. It exposes overlapping planning work, not a recommended or legally executable roster plan.
Decline option ×1 · Exercise option ×4
Planning scenario — some salary, basketball or asset evidence is missing
Constraint lanes and evidence gaps
Basketball: 4 supported dependence case(s) · 1 withheld · 1 criticalRoster spots: 4 stay occupied · 1 may openReported salary: 4 retained ($51.2M) · 1 with unknown salary effectCurrent cap context: Tax pressure review triggeredFuture cap: Future salary, tax, apron and cap room require a fresh calculationCBA legality: Combined CBA legality of executing these decisions together is unresolvedMarket price: Market price, counterparty willingness and replacement cost are unresolvedException reference: 0 visible · 5 withheldDraft capital: 5 visible · 0 withheldProbability: No probability estimated
Named evidence gaps
- Exact decision timing unresolved
- Salary consequence incomplete
- Current exception wallet unavailable
- Combined cba legality unresolved
- Scenario probability not estimated
- Basketball outcome not evaluated
LAL scenario 2 keeps or continues 4 decisions and exits or defers 1. It exposes overlapping planning work, not a recommended or legally executable roster plan.
Decline option ×1 · Exercise option ×4
Planning scenario — some salary, basketball or asset evidence is missing
Constraint lanes and evidence gaps
Basketball: 4 supported dependence case(s) · 1 withheld · 1 criticalRoster spots: 4 stay occupied · 1 may openReported salary: 4 retained ($67.4M) · 1 with unknown salary effectCurrent cap context: Tax pressure review triggeredFuture cap: Future salary, tax, apron and cap room require a fresh calculationCBA legality: Combined CBA legality of executing these decisions together is unresolvedMarket price: Market price, counterparty willingness and replacement cost are unresolvedException reference: 0 visible · 5 withheldDraft capital: 5 visible · 0 withheldProbability: No probability estimated
Named evidence gaps
- Exact decision timing unresolved
- Salary consequence incomplete
- Current exception wallet unavailable
- Combined cba legality unresolved
- Scenario probability not estimated
- Basketball outcome not evaluated
LAL scenario 3 keeps or continues 3 decisions and exits or defers 2. It exposes overlapping planning work, not a recommended or legally executable roster plan.
Decline option ×2 · Exercise option ×3
Planning scenario — some salary, basketball or asset evidence is missing
Constraint lanes and evidence gaps
Basketball: 4 supported dependence case(s) · 1 withheld · 1 criticalRoster spots: 3 stay occupied · 2 may openReported salary: 3 retained ($48.7M) · 2 with unknown salary effectCurrent cap context: Tax pressure review triggeredFuture cap: Future salary, tax, apron and cap room require a fresh calculationCBA legality: Combined CBA legality of executing these decisions together is unresolvedMarket price: Market price, counterparty willingness and replacement cost are unresolvedException reference: 0 visible · 5 withheldDraft capital: 5 visible · 0 withheldProbability: No probability estimated
Named evidence gaps
- Exact decision timing unresolved
- Salary consequence incomplete
- Current exception wallet unavailable
- Combined cba legality unresolved
- Scenario probability not estimated
- Basketball outcome not evaluated
LAL scenario 4 keeps or continues 4 decisions and exits or defers 1. It exposes overlapping planning work, not a recommended or legally executable roster plan.
Decline option ×1 · Exercise option ×4
Planning scenario — some salary, basketball or asset evidence is missing
Constraint lanes and evidence gaps
Basketball: 4 supported dependence case(s) · 1 withheld · 1 criticalRoster spots: 4 stay occupied · 1 may openReported salary: 4 retained ($67.4M) · 1 with unknown salary effectCurrent cap context: Tax pressure review triggeredFuture cap: Future salary, tax, apron and cap room require a fresh calculationCBA legality: Combined CBA legality of executing these decisions together is unresolvedMarket price: Market price, counterparty willingness and replacement cost are unresolvedException reference: 0 visible · 5 withheldDraft capital: 5 visible · 0 withheldProbability: No probability estimated
Named evidence gaps
- Exact decision timing unresolved
- Salary consequence incomplete
- Current exception wallet unavailable
- Combined cba legality unresolved
- Scenario probability not estimated
- Basketball outcome not evaluated
LAL scenario 5 keeps or continues 3 decisions and exits or defers 2. It exposes overlapping planning work, not a recommended or legally executable roster plan.
Decline option ×2 · Exercise option ×3
Planning scenario — some salary, basketball or asset evidence is missing
Constraint lanes and evidence gaps
Basketball: 4 supported dependence case(s) · 1 withheld · 1 criticalRoster spots: 3 stay occupied · 2 may openReported salary: 3 retained ($48.7M) · 2 with unknown salary effectCurrent cap context: Tax pressure review triggeredFuture cap: Future salary, tax, apron and cap room require a fresh calculationCBA legality: Combined CBA legality of executing these decisions together is unresolvedMarket price: Market price, counterparty willingness and replacement cost are unresolvedException reference: 0 visible · 5 withheldDraft capital: 5 visible · 0 withheldProbability: No probability estimated
Named evidence gaps
- Exact decision timing unresolved
- Salary consequence incomplete
- Current exception wallet unavailable
- Combined cba legality unresolved
- Scenario probability not estimated
- Basketball outcome not evaluated
LAL scenario 6 keeps or continues 3 decisions and exits or defers 2. It exposes overlapping planning work, not a recommended or legally executable roster plan.
Decline option ×2 · Exercise option ×3
Planning scenario — some salary, basketball or asset evidence is missing
Constraint lanes and evidence gaps
Basketball: 4 supported dependence case(s) · 1 withheld · 1 criticalRoster spots: 3 stay occupied · 2 may openReported salary: 3 retained ($64.9M) · 2 with unknown salary effectCurrent cap context: Tax pressure review triggeredFuture cap: Future salary, tax, apron and cap room require a fresh calculationCBA legality: Combined CBA legality of executing these decisions together is unresolvedMarket price: Market price, counterparty willingness and replacement cost are unresolvedException reference: 0 visible · 5 withheldDraft capital: 5 visible · 0 withheldProbability: No probability estimated
Named evidence gaps
- Exact decision timing unresolved
- Salary consequence incomplete
- Current exception wallet unavailable
- Combined cba legality unresolved
- Scenario probability not estimated
- Basketball outcome not evaluated
LAL scenario 7 keeps or continues 2 decisions and exits or defers 3. It exposes overlapping planning work, not a recommended or legally executable roster plan.
Decline option ×3 · Exercise option ×2
Planning scenario — some salary, basketball or asset evidence is missing
Constraint lanes and evidence gaps
Basketball: 4 supported dependence case(s) · 1 withheld · 1 criticalRoster spots: 2 stay occupied · 3 may openReported salary: 2 retained ($46.3M) · 3 with unknown salary effectCurrent cap context: Tax pressure review triggeredFuture cap: Future salary, tax, apron and cap room require a fresh calculationCBA legality: Combined CBA legality of executing these decisions together is unresolvedMarket price: Market price, counterparty willingness and replacement cost are unresolvedException reference: 0 visible · 5 withheldDraft capital: 5 visible · 0 withheldProbability: No probability estimated
Named evidence gaps
- Exact decision timing unresolved
- Salary consequence incomplete
- Current exception wallet unavailable
- Combined cba legality unresolved
- Scenario probability not estimated
- Basketball outcome not evaluated
LAL scenario 8 keeps or continues 4 decisions and exits or defers 1. It exposes overlapping planning work, not a recommended or legally executable roster plan.
Decline option ×1 · Exercise option ×4
Planning scenario — some salary, basketball or asset evidence is missing
Constraint lanes and evidence gaps
Basketball: 4 supported dependence case(s) · 1 withheld · 1 criticalRoster spots: 4 stay occupied · 1 may openReported salary: 4 retained ($26.7M) · 1 with unknown salary effectCurrent cap context: Tax pressure review triggeredFuture cap: Future salary, tax, apron and cap room require a fresh calculationCBA legality: Combined CBA legality of executing these decisions together is unresolvedMarket price: Market price, counterparty willingness and replacement cost are unresolvedException reference: 0 visible · 5 withheldDraft capital: 5 visible · 0 withheldProbability: No probability estimated
Named evidence gaps
- Exact decision timing unresolved
- Salary consequence incomplete
- Basketball replacement evidence incomplete
- Current exception wallet unavailable
- Combined cba legality unresolved
- Scenario probability not estimated
- Basketball outcome not evaluated
LAL scenario 9 keeps or continues 3 decisions and exits or defers 2. It exposes overlapping planning work, not a recommended or legally executable roster plan.
Decline option ×2 · Exercise option ×3
Planning scenario — some salary, basketball or asset evidence is missing
Constraint lanes and evidence gaps
Basketball: 4 supported dependence case(s) · 1 withheld · 1 criticalRoster spots: 3 stay occupied · 2 may openReported salary: 3 retained ($7.96M) · 2 with unknown salary effectCurrent cap context: Tax pressure review triggeredFuture cap: Future salary, tax, apron and cap room require a fresh calculationCBA legality: Combined CBA legality of executing these decisions together is unresolvedMarket price: Market price, counterparty willingness and replacement cost are unresolvedException reference: 0 visible · 5 withheldDraft capital: 5 visible · 0 withheldProbability: No probability estimated
Named evidence gaps
- Exact decision timing unresolved
- Salary consequence incomplete
- Basketball replacement evidence incomplete
- Current exception wallet unavailable
- Combined cba legality unresolved
- Scenario probability not estimated
- Basketball outcome not evaluated
LAL scenario 10 keeps or continues 3 decisions and exits or defers 2. It exposes overlapping planning work, not a recommended or legally executable roster plan.
Decline option ×2 · Exercise option ×3
Planning scenario — some salary, basketball or asset evidence is missing
Constraint lanes and evidence gaps
Basketball: 4 supported dependence case(s) · 1 withheld · 1 criticalRoster spots: 3 stay occupied · 2 may openReported salary: 3 retained ($24.2M) · 2 with unknown salary effectCurrent cap context: Tax pressure review triggeredFuture cap: Future salary, tax, apron and cap room require a fresh calculationCBA legality: Combined CBA legality of executing these decisions together is unresolvedMarket price: Market price, counterparty willingness and replacement cost are unresolvedException reference: 0 visible · 5 withheldDraft capital: 5 visible · 0 withheldProbability: No probability estimated
Named evidence gaps
- Exact decision timing unresolved
- Salary consequence incomplete
- Basketball replacement evidence incomplete
- Current exception wallet unavailable
- Combined cba legality unresolved
- Scenario probability not estimated
- Basketball outcome not evaluated
LAL scenario 11 keeps or continues 2 decisions and exits or defers 3. It exposes overlapping planning work, not a recommended or legally executable roster plan.
Decline option ×3 · Exercise option ×2
Planning scenario — some salary, basketball or asset evidence is missing
Constraint lanes and evidence gaps
Basketball: 4 supported dependence case(s) · 1 withheld · 1 criticalRoster spots: 2 stay occupied · 3 may openReported salary: 2 retained ($5.50M) · 3 with unknown salary effectCurrent cap context: Tax pressure review triggeredFuture cap: Future salary, tax, apron and cap room require a fresh calculationCBA legality: Combined CBA legality of executing these decisions together is unresolvedMarket price: Market price, counterparty willingness and replacement cost are unresolvedException reference: 0 visible · 5 withheldDraft capital: 5 visible · 0 withheldProbability: No probability estimated
Named evidence gaps
- Exact decision timing unresolved
- Salary consequence incomplete
- Basketball replacement evidence incomplete
- Current exception wallet unavailable
- Combined cba legality unresolved
- Scenario probability not estimated
- Basketball outcome not evaluated
LAL scenario 12 keeps or continues 3 decisions and exits or defers 2. It exposes overlapping planning work, not a recommended or legally executable roster plan.
Decline option ×2 · Exercise option ×3
Planning scenario — some salary, basketball or asset evidence is missing
Constraint lanes and evidence gaps
Basketball: 4 supported dependence case(s) · 1 withheld · 1 criticalRoster spots: 3 stay occupied · 2 may openReported salary: 3 retained ($24.2M) · 2 with unknown salary effectCurrent cap context: Tax pressure review triggeredFuture cap: Future salary, tax, apron and cap room require a fresh calculationCBA legality: Combined CBA legality of executing these decisions together is unresolvedMarket price: Market price, counterparty willingness and replacement cost are unresolvedException reference: 0 visible · 5 withheldDraft capital: 5 visible · 0 withheldProbability: No probability estimated
Named evidence gaps
- Exact decision timing unresolved
- Salary consequence incomplete
- Basketball replacement evidence incomplete
- Current exception wallet unavailable
- Combined cba legality unresolved
- Scenario probability not estimated
- Basketball outcome not evaluated
LAL scenario 13 keeps or continues 2 decisions and exits or defers 3. It exposes overlapping planning work, not a recommended or legally executable roster plan.
Decline option ×3 · Exercise option ×2
Planning scenario — some salary, basketball or asset evidence is missing
Constraint lanes and evidence gaps
Basketball: 4 supported dependence case(s) · 1 withheld · 1 criticalRoster spots: 2 stay occupied · 3 may openReported salary: 2 retained ($5.50M) · 3 with unknown salary effectCurrent cap context: Tax pressure review triggeredFuture cap: Future salary, tax, apron and cap room require a fresh calculationCBA legality: Combined CBA legality of executing these decisions together is unresolvedMarket price: Market price, counterparty willingness and replacement cost are unresolvedException reference: 0 visible · 5 withheldDraft capital: 5 visible · 0 withheldProbability: No probability estimated
Named evidence gaps
- Exact decision timing unresolved
- Salary consequence incomplete
- Basketball replacement evidence incomplete
- Current exception wallet unavailable
- Combined cba legality unresolved
- Scenario probability not estimated
- Basketball outcome not evaluated
LAL scenario 14 keeps or continues 2 decisions and exits or defers 3. It exposes overlapping planning work, not a recommended or legally executable roster plan.
Decline option ×3 · Exercise option ×2
Planning scenario — some salary, basketball or asset evidence is missing
Constraint lanes and evidence gaps
Basketball: 4 supported dependence case(s) · 1 withheld · 1 criticalRoster spots: 2 stay occupied · 3 may openReported salary: 2 retained ($21.7M) · 3 with unknown salary effectCurrent cap context: Tax pressure review triggeredFuture cap: Future salary, tax, apron and cap room require a fresh calculationCBA legality: Combined CBA legality of executing these decisions together is unresolvedMarket price: Market price, counterparty willingness and replacement cost are unresolvedException reference: 0 visible · 5 withheldDraft capital: 5 visible · 0 withheldProbability: No probability estimated
Named evidence gaps
- Exact decision timing unresolved
- Salary consequence incomplete
- Basketball replacement evidence incomplete
- Current exception wallet unavailable
- Combined cba legality unresolved
- Scenario probability not estimated
- Basketball outcome not evaluated
LAL scenario 15 keeps or continues 1 decisions and exits or defers 4. It exposes overlapping planning work, not a recommended or legally executable roster plan.
Decline option ×4 · Exercise option ×1
Planning scenario — some salary, basketball or asset evidence is missing
Constraint lanes and evidence gaps
Basketball: 4 supported dependence case(s) · 1 withheld · 1 criticalRoster spots: 1 stay occupied · 4 may openReported salary: 1 retained ($3.04M) · 4 with unknown salary effectCurrent cap context: Tax pressure review triggeredFuture cap: Future salary, tax, apron and cap room require a fresh calculationCBA legality: Combined CBA legality of executing these decisions together is unresolvedMarket price: Market price, counterparty willingness and replacement cost are unresolvedException reference: 0 visible · 5 withheldDraft capital: 5 visible · 0 withheldProbability: No probability estimated
Named evidence gaps
- Exact decision timing unresolved
- Salary consequence incomplete
- Basketball replacement evidence incomplete
- Current exception wallet unavailable
- Combined cba legality unresolved
- Scenario probability not estimated
- Basketball outcome not evaluated
LAL scenario 16 keeps or continues 4 decisions and exits or defers 1. It exposes overlapping planning work, not a recommended or legally executable roster plan.
Decline option ×1 · Exercise option ×4
Planning scenario — some salary, basketball or asset evidence is missing
Constraint lanes and evidence gaps
Basketball: 4 supported dependence case(s) · 1 withheld · 1 criticalRoster spots: 4 stay occupied · 1 may openReported salary: 4 retained ($66.8M) · 1 with unknown salary effectCurrent cap context: Tax pressure review triggeredFuture cap: Future salary, tax, apron and cap room require a fresh calculationCBA legality: Combined CBA legality of executing these decisions together is unresolvedMarket price: Market price, counterparty willingness and replacement cost are unresolvedException reference: 0 visible · 5 withheldDraft capital: 5 visible · 0 withheldProbability: No probability estimated
Named evidence gaps
- Exact decision timing unresolved
- Salary consequence incomplete
- Current exception wallet unavailable
- Combined cba legality unresolved
- Scenario probability not estimated
- Basketball outcome not evaluated
LAL scenario 17 keeps or continues 3 decisions and exits or defers 2. It exposes overlapping planning work, not a recommended or legally executable roster plan.
Decline option ×2 · Exercise option ×3
Planning scenario — some salary, basketball or asset evidence is missing
Constraint lanes and evidence gaps
Basketball: 4 supported dependence case(s) · 1 withheld · 1 criticalRoster spots: 3 stay occupied · 2 may openReported salary: 3 retained ($48.1M) · 2 with unknown salary effectCurrent cap context: Tax pressure review triggeredFuture cap: Future salary, tax, apron and cap room require a fresh calculationCBA legality: Combined CBA legality of executing these decisions together is unresolvedMarket price: Market price, counterparty willingness and replacement cost are unresolvedException reference: 0 visible · 5 withheldDraft capital: 5 visible · 0 withheldProbability: No probability estimated
Named evidence gaps
- Exact decision timing unresolved
- Salary consequence incomplete
- Current exception wallet unavailable
- Combined cba legality unresolved
- Scenario probability not estimated
- Basketball outcome not evaluated
LAL scenario 18 keeps or continues 3 decisions and exits or defers 2. It exposes overlapping planning work, not a recommended or legally executable roster plan.
Decline option ×2 · Exercise option ×3
Planning scenario — some salary, basketball or asset evidence is missing
Constraint lanes and evidence gaps
Basketball: 4 supported dependence case(s) · 1 withheld · 1 criticalRoster spots: 3 stay occupied · 2 may openReported salary: 3 retained ($64.4M) · 2 with unknown salary effectCurrent cap context: Tax pressure review triggeredFuture cap: Future salary, tax, apron and cap room require a fresh calculationCBA legality: Combined CBA legality of executing these decisions together is unresolvedMarket price: Market price, counterparty willingness and replacement cost are unresolvedException reference: 0 visible · 5 withheldDraft capital: 5 visible · 0 withheldProbability: No probability estimated
Named evidence gaps
- Exact decision timing unresolved
- Salary consequence incomplete
- Current exception wallet unavailable
- Combined cba legality unresolved
- Scenario probability not estimated
- Basketball outcome not evaluated
LAL scenario 19 keeps or continues 2 decisions and exits or defers 3. It exposes overlapping planning work, not a recommended or legally executable roster plan.
Decline option ×3 · Exercise option ×2
Planning scenario — some salary, basketball or asset evidence is missing
Constraint lanes and evidence gaps
Basketball: 4 supported dependence case(s) · 1 withheld · 1 criticalRoster spots: 2 stay occupied · 3 may openReported salary: 2 retained ($45.7M) · 3 with unknown salary effectCurrent cap context: Tax pressure review triggeredFuture cap: Future salary, tax, apron and cap room require a fresh calculationCBA legality: Combined CBA legality of executing these decisions together is unresolvedMarket price: Market price, counterparty willingness and replacement cost are unresolvedException reference: 0 visible · 5 withheldDraft capital: 5 visible · 0 withheldProbability: No probability estimated
Named evidence gaps
- Exact decision timing unresolved
- Salary consequence incomplete
- Current exception wallet unavailable
- Combined cba legality unresolved
- Scenario probability not estimated
- Basketball outcome not evaluated
LAL scenario 20 keeps or continues 3 decisions and exits or defers 2. It exposes overlapping planning work, not a recommended or legally executable roster plan.
Decline option ×2 · Exercise option ×3
Planning scenario — some salary, basketball or asset evidence is missing
Constraint lanes and evidence gaps
Basketball: 4 supported dependence case(s) · 1 withheld · 1 criticalRoster spots: 3 stay occupied · 2 may openReported salary: 3 retained ($64.4M) · 2 with unknown salary effectCurrent cap context: Tax pressure review triggeredFuture cap: Future salary, tax, apron and cap room require a fresh calculationCBA legality: Combined CBA legality of executing these decisions together is unresolvedMarket price: Market price, counterparty willingness and replacement cost are unresolvedException reference: 0 visible · 5 withheldDraft capital: 5 visible · 0 withheldProbability: No probability estimated
Named evidence gaps
- Exact decision timing unresolved
- Salary consequence incomplete
- Current exception wallet unavailable
- Combined cba legality unresolved
- Scenario probability not estimated
- Basketball outcome not evaluated
LAL scenario 21 keeps or continues 2 decisions and exits or defers 3. It exposes overlapping planning work, not a recommended or legally executable roster plan.
Decline option ×3 · Exercise option ×2
Planning scenario — some salary, basketball or asset evidence is missing
Constraint lanes and evidence gaps
Basketball: 4 supported dependence case(s) · 1 withheld · 1 criticalRoster spots: 2 stay occupied · 3 may openReported salary: 2 retained ($45.7M) · 3 with unknown salary effectCurrent cap context: Tax pressure review triggeredFuture cap: Future salary, tax, apron and cap room require a fresh calculationCBA legality: Combined CBA legality of executing these decisions together is unresolvedMarket price: Market price, counterparty willingness and replacement cost are unresolvedException reference: 0 visible · 5 withheldDraft capital: 5 visible · 0 withheldProbability: No probability estimated
Named evidence gaps
- Exact decision timing unresolved
- Salary consequence incomplete
- Current exception wallet unavailable
- Combined cba legality unresolved
- Scenario probability not estimated
- Basketball outcome not evaluated
LAL scenario 22 keeps or continues 2 decisions and exits or defers 3. It exposes overlapping planning work, not a recommended or legally executable roster plan.
Decline option ×3 · Exercise option ×2
Planning scenario — some salary, basketball or asset evidence is missing
Constraint lanes and evidence gaps
Basketball: 4 supported dependence case(s) · 1 withheld · 1 criticalRoster spots: 2 stay occupied · 3 may openReported salary: 2 retained ($61.9M) · 3 with unknown salary effectCurrent cap context: Tax pressure review triggeredFuture cap: Future salary, tax, apron and cap room require a fresh calculationCBA legality: Combined CBA legality of executing these decisions together is unresolvedMarket price: Market price, counterparty willingness and replacement cost are unresolvedException reference: 0 visible · 5 withheldDraft capital: 5 visible · 0 withheldProbability: No probability estimated
Named evidence gaps
- Exact decision timing unresolved
- Salary consequence incomplete
- Current exception wallet unavailable
- Combined cba legality unresolved
- Scenario probability not estimated
- Basketball outcome not evaluated
LAL scenario 23 keeps or continues 1 decisions and exits or defers 4. It exposes overlapping planning work, not a recommended or legally executable roster plan.
Decline option ×4 · Exercise option ×1
Planning scenario — some salary, basketball or asset evidence is missing
Constraint lanes and evidence gaps
Basketball: 4 supported dependence case(s) · 1 withheld · 1 criticalRoster spots: 1 stay occupied · 4 may openReported salary: 1 retained ($43.2M) · 4 with unknown salary effectCurrent cap context: Tax pressure review triggeredFuture cap: Future salary, tax, apron and cap room require a fresh calculationCBA legality: Combined CBA legality of executing these decisions together is unresolvedMarket price: Market price, counterparty willingness and replacement cost are unresolvedException reference: 0 visible · 5 withheldDraft capital: 5 visible · 0 withheldProbability: No probability estimated
Named evidence gaps
- Exact decision timing unresolved
- Salary consequence incomplete
- Current exception wallet unavailable
- Combined cba legality unresolved
- Scenario probability not estimated
- Basketball outcome not evaluated
LAL scenario 24 keeps or continues 3 decisions and exits or defers 2. It exposes overlapping planning work, not a recommended or legally executable roster plan.
Decline option ×2 · Exercise option ×3
Planning scenario — some salary, basketball or asset evidence is missing
Constraint lanes and evidence gaps
Basketball: 4 supported dependence case(s) · 1 withheld · 1 criticalRoster spots: 3 stay occupied · 2 may openReported salary: 3 retained ($23.6M) · 2 with unknown salary effectCurrent cap context: Tax pressure review triggeredFuture cap: Future salary, tax, apron and cap room require a fresh calculationCBA legality: Combined CBA legality of executing these decisions together is unresolvedMarket price: Market price, counterparty willingness and replacement cost are unresolvedException reference: 0 visible · 5 withheldDraft capital: 5 visible · 0 withheldProbability: No probability estimated
Named evidence gaps
- Exact decision timing unresolved
- Salary consequence incomplete
- Basketball replacement evidence incomplete
- Current exception wallet unavailable
- Combined cba legality unresolved
- Scenario probability not estimated
- Basketball outcome not evaluated
LAL scenario 25 keeps or continues 2 decisions and exits or defers 3. It exposes overlapping planning work, not a recommended or legally executable roster plan.
Decline option ×3 · Exercise option ×2
Planning scenario — some salary, basketball or asset evidence is missing
Constraint lanes and evidence gaps
Basketball: 4 supported dependence case(s) · 1 withheld · 1 criticalRoster spots: 2 stay occupied · 3 may openReported salary: 2 retained ($4.93M) · 3 with unknown salary effectCurrent cap context: Tax pressure review triggeredFuture cap: Future salary, tax, apron and cap room require a fresh calculationCBA legality: Combined CBA legality of executing these decisions together is unresolvedMarket price: Market price, counterparty willingness and replacement cost are unresolvedException reference: 0 visible · 5 withheldDraft capital: 5 visible · 0 withheldProbability: No probability estimated
Named evidence gaps
- Exact decision timing unresolved
- Salary consequence incomplete
- Basketball replacement evidence incomplete
- Current exception wallet unavailable
- Combined cba legality unresolved
- Scenario probability not estimated
- Basketball outcome not evaluated
LAL scenario 26 keeps or continues 2 decisions and exits or defers 3. It exposes overlapping planning work, not a recommended or legally executable roster plan.
Decline option ×3 · Exercise option ×2
Planning scenario — some salary, basketball or asset evidence is missing
Constraint lanes and evidence gaps
Basketball: 4 supported dependence case(s) · 1 withheld · 1 criticalRoster spots: 2 stay occupied · 3 may openReported salary: 2 retained ($21.2M) · 3 with unknown salary effectCurrent cap context: Tax pressure review triggeredFuture cap: Future salary, tax, apron and cap room require a fresh calculationCBA legality: Combined CBA legality of executing these decisions together is unresolvedMarket price: Market price, counterparty willingness and replacement cost are unresolvedException reference: 0 visible · 5 withheldDraft capital: 5 visible · 0 withheldProbability: No probability estimated
Named evidence gaps
- Exact decision timing unresolved
- Salary consequence incomplete
- Basketball replacement evidence incomplete
- Current exception wallet unavailable
- Combined cba legality unresolved
- Scenario probability not estimated
- Basketball outcome not evaluated
LAL scenario 27 keeps or continues 1 decisions and exits or defers 4. It exposes overlapping planning work, not a recommended or legally executable roster plan.
Decline option ×4 · Exercise option ×1
Planning scenario — some salary, basketball or asset evidence is missing
Constraint lanes and evidence gaps
Basketball: 4 supported dependence case(s) · 1 withheld · 1 criticalRoster spots: 1 stay occupied · 4 may openReported salary: 1 retained ($2.46M) · 4 with unknown salary effectCurrent cap context: Tax pressure review triggeredFuture cap: Future salary, tax, apron and cap room require a fresh calculationCBA legality: Combined CBA legality of executing these decisions together is unresolvedMarket price: Market price, counterparty willingness and replacement cost are unresolvedException reference: 0 visible · 5 withheldDraft capital: 5 visible · 0 withheldProbability: No probability estimated
Named evidence gaps
- Exact decision timing unresolved
- Salary consequence incomplete
- Basketball replacement evidence incomplete
- Current exception wallet unavailable
- Combined cba legality unresolved
- Scenario probability not estimated
- Basketball outcome not evaluated
LAL scenario 28 keeps or continues 2 decisions and exits or defers 3. It exposes overlapping planning work, not a recommended or legally executable roster plan.
Decline option ×3 · Exercise option ×2
Planning scenario — some salary, basketball or asset evidence is missing
Constraint lanes and evidence gaps
Basketball: 4 supported dependence case(s) · 1 withheld · 1 criticalRoster spots: 2 stay occupied · 3 may openReported salary: 2 retained ($21.2M) · 3 with unknown salary effectCurrent cap context: Tax pressure review triggeredFuture cap: Future salary, tax, apron and cap room require a fresh calculationCBA legality: Combined CBA legality of executing these decisions together is unresolvedMarket price: Market price, counterparty willingness and replacement cost are unresolvedException reference: 0 visible · 5 withheldDraft capital: 5 visible · 0 withheldProbability: No probability estimated
Named evidence gaps
- Exact decision timing unresolved
- Salary consequence incomplete
- Basketball replacement evidence incomplete
- Current exception wallet unavailable
- Combined cba legality unresolved
- Scenario probability not estimated
- Basketball outcome not evaluated
LAL scenario 29 keeps or continues 1 decisions and exits or defers 4. It exposes overlapping planning work, not a recommended or legally executable roster plan.
Decline option ×4 · Exercise option ×1
Planning scenario — some salary, basketball or asset evidence is missing
Constraint lanes and evidence gaps
Basketball: 4 supported dependence case(s) · 1 withheld · 1 criticalRoster spots: 1 stay occupied · 4 may openReported salary: 1 retained ($2.46M) · 4 with unknown salary effectCurrent cap context: Tax pressure review triggeredFuture cap: Future salary, tax, apron and cap room require a fresh calculationCBA legality: Combined CBA legality of executing these decisions together is unresolvedMarket price: Market price, counterparty willingness and replacement cost are unresolvedException reference: 0 visible · 5 withheldDraft capital: 5 visible · 0 withheldProbability: No probability estimated
Named evidence gaps
- Exact decision timing unresolved
- Salary consequence incomplete
- Basketball replacement evidence incomplete
- Current exception wallet unavailable
- Combined cba legality unresolved
- Scenario probability not estimated
- Basketball outcome not evaluated
LAL scenario 30 keeps or continues 1 decisions and exits or defers 4. It exposes overlapping planning work, not a recommended or legally executable roster plan.
Decline option ×4 · Exercise option ×1
Planning scenario — some salary, basketball or asset evidence is missing
Constraint lanes and evidence gaps
Basketball: 4 supported dependence case(s) · 1 withheld · 1 criticalRoster spots: 1 stay occupied · 4 may openReported salary: 1 retained ($18.7M) · 4 with unknown salary effectCurrent cap context: Tax pressure review triggeredFuture cap: Future salary, tax, apron and cap room require a fresh calculationCBA legality: Combined CBA legality of executing these decisions together is unresolvedMarket price: Market price, counterparty willingness and replacement cost are unresolvedException reference: 0 visible · 5 withheldDraft capital: 5 visible · 0 withheldProbability: No probability estimated
Named evidence gaps
- Exact decision timing unresolved
- Salary consequence incomplete
- Basketball replacement evidence incomplete
- Current exception wallet unavailable
- Combined cba legality unresolved
- Scenario probability not estimated
- Basketball outcome not evaluated
Exit or defer everything1 combination
LAL scenario 31 keeps or continues 0 decisions and exits or defers 5. It exposes overlapping planning work, not a recommended or legally executable roster plan.
Decline option ×5
Planning scenario — some salary, basketball or asset evidence is missing
Constraint lanes and evidence gaps
Basketball: 4 supported dependence case(s) · 1 withheld · 1 criticalRoster spots: 0 stay occupied · 5 may openReported salary: 5 with unknown salary effectCurrent cap context: Tax pressure review triggeredFuture cap: Future salary, tax, apron and cap room require a fresh calculationCBA legality: Combined CBA legality of executing these decisions together is unresolvedMarket price: Market price, counterparty willingness and replacement cost are unresolvedException reference: 0 visible · 5 withheldDraft capital: 5 visible · 0 withheldProbability: No probability estimated
Named evidence gaps
- Exact decision timing unresolved
- Salary consequence incomplete
- Basketball replacement evidence incomplete
- Current exception wallet unavailable
- Combined cba legality unresolved
- Scenario probability not estimated
- Basketball outcome not evaluated
What the scenarios cannot prove
Where the constraint lanes refuse a conclusion across these scenarios.0draft capital abstentions
1reported salary abstentions
32exception wallet abstentions
16basketball replacement abstentions
Shared planning anchors are staff workflow dates, not automatically exact simultaneous contract deadlines.
All bounded branch combinations are enumerated; none is assigned a probability or recommendation.
Player-specific possessions and ratings are not summed across players.
Only directly reported option salary is added across decisions.
Every scenario needs a new dated cap, roster, trade and CBA execution test.
Prior exception receipts are reference evidence, not the scenario wallet.
Scenario branches do not alter pick ownership or prove tradability.
Team-season counts summarize conditional branch-space coverage. They are not probabilities, rankings, cap projections, legal opinions or front-office grades.