← All trades
February 19, 2015
PHI · MIL · PHO
Each side read on its own: the value that came in against what went out, and whether the move did what the team set out to do — judged both at the time and with the benefit of hindsight.
PHIStockpiling assetsBanking picks and young players for later.
Received
2015 1st → Mikal Bridges
Value in vs. out
At the time
-11.1gave up more
How it aged
+17.4got much more back
Aged better than it looked on paper.
Did it do the job?
At the time
53%fell short
How it aged
77%mostly worked
Better than it looked — a quiet win.
· Multi-team deal — value in/out is an approximation.
MILStockpiling assetsBanking picks and young players for later.
Received
Michael Carter-Williams
Tyler Ennis
Miles Plumlee
Value in vs. out
At the time
-4.6gave up more
How it aged
-18.4gave up much more
Looked better on paper than it aged.
Did it do the job?
At the time
15%didn't work
How it aged
0%didn't work
A middling bet that hasn't paid off.
· Multi-team deal — value in/out is an approximation.
PHODepth moveRounding out the bench.
Received
Brandon Knight
Kendall Marshall
Value in vs. out
At the time
-11.4gave up more
How it aged
-27.8gave up much more
Looked better on paper than it aged.
Did it do the job?
At the time
not yet gradable
How it aged
Minor move — not graded
· Some received pieces can't be graded yet — the value shown may be understated.
· Multi-team deal — value in/out is an approximation.