← All trades
February 2, 2017
MIL · CHO
Each side read on its own: the value that came in against what went out, and whether the move did what the team set out to do — judged both at the time and with the benefit of hindsight.
MILWin-now pushGoing for it now — trading future for present help.
Received
Roy Hibbert
Spencer Hawes
Value in vs. out
At the time
+6.3got more back
How it aged
+0.0roughly even
Looked better on paper than it aged.
Did it do the job?
At the time
43%fell short
How it aged
19%didn't work
A middling bet that hasn't paid off.
· Some received pieces can't be graded yet — the value shown may be understated.
CHATeardownSelling the present for picks and youth.
Received
—Value in vs. out
At the time
-6.3gave up more
How it aged
+0.0roughly even
Aged better than it looked on paper.
Did it do the job?
At the time
3%didn't work
How it aged
0%didn't work
A modest move — modest return.