← All trades
February 16, 2016
MEM · MIA · CHO
Each side read on its own: the value that came in against what went out, and whether the move did what the team set out to do — judged both at the time and with the benefit of hindsight.
MEMStockpiling assetsBanking picks and young players for later.
Received
P.J. Hairston
Chris Andersen
2018 1st → Jarred Vanderbilt
2017 1st → 60 in 2017, unprotected in 2018
2019 1st
2019 1st
Value in vs. out
At the time
+25.0got much more back
How it aged
+6.8got more back
Looked better on paper than it aged.
Did it do the job?
At the time
100%did the job
How it aged
25%didn't work
Looked smart at the time — hasn't paid off.
· A traded pick's outcome couldn't be traced.
· Multi-team deal — value in/out is an approximation.
MIASalary dumpClearing money off the books.
Received
Brian Roberts
Price of the move
At the time
-37.7paid a steep price
How it aged
-9.0paid a fair price
Aged better than it looked on paper.
Did it do the job?
At the time
80%did the job
How it aged
Cap outcome not yet graded
· Some received pieces can't be graded yet — the value shown may be understated.
· Multi-team deal — value in/out is an approximation.
CHATeardownSelling the present for picks and youth.
Received
—Value in vs. out
At the time
-32.2gave up much more
How it aged
-6.8gave up more
Aged better than it looked on paper.
Did it do the job?
At the time
13%didn't work
How it aged
0%didn't work
A middling bet that hasn't paid off.
· Multi-team deal — value in/out is an approximation.