Gingeball

League Board

Which teams have the most open conditional paths — and how much still needs a dated test?

As ofLatest

Decision volume Planning windows Sequencing workload Keep/exit optionality Competitive window

2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26

sorted by open paths · click a column to re-sort · click a team for its workspace · open a row for why it is here

Team	Branches	Open paths	Needs planning	Needs evidence	Needs dated test	Path abstentions	Basketball gaps
OKC OKC has 36 conditional decision branches and 27 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Conditional path map with explicit evidence gapsCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	36	27	7	45	36	38	8
PHX PHX has 32 conditional decision branches and 27 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Conditional path map with explicit evidence gapsCap context:Tax pressure review triggeredDraft:WithheldWithheld — No future pick control evidence	32	27	5	5	32	64	0
MIA MIA has 32 conditional decision branches and 26 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Conditional path map with explicit evidence gapsCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:WithheldWithheld — No future pick control evidence	32	26	6	6	32	64	0
DEN DEN has 26 conditional decision branches and 24 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Conditional path map with explicit evidence gapsCap context:Tax pressure review triggeredDraft:WithheldWithheld — No future pick control evidence	26	24	2	2	26	52	0
GSW GSW has 28 conditional decision branches and 23 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Conditional path map with explicit evidence gapsCap context:First apron pressure review triggeredDraft:WithheldWithheld — No future pick control evidence	28	23	3	5	28	58	12
DAL DAL has 26 conditional decision branches and 22 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Conditional path map with explicit evidence gapsCap context:Second apron pressure review triggeredDraft:WithheldWithheld — No future pick control evidence	26	22	2	4	26	28	12
NOP NOP has 28 conditional decision branches and 22 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Conditional path map with explicit evidence gapsCap context:Tax pressure review triggeredDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	28	22	5	34	28	29	4
PHI PHI has 26 conditional decision branches and 22 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Conditional path map with explicit evidence gapsCap context:Tax pressure review triggeredDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	26	22	4	30	26	26	0
UTA UTA has 28 conditional decision branches and 22 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Conditional path map with explicit evidence gapsCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	28	22	2	34	28	32	14
IND IND has 26 conditional decision branches and 20 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	26	20	5	32	26	27	6
LAL LAL has 24 conditional decision branches and 20 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Conditional path map with explicit evidence gapsCap context:First apron pressure review triggeredDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	24	20	4	28	24	24	0
POR POR has 22 conditional decision branches and 20 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Conditional path map with explicit evidence gapsCap context:First apron pressure review triggeredDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	22	20	2	24	22	22	4
SAC SAC has 26 conditional decision branches and 20 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Conditional path map with explicit evidence gapsCap context:Tax pressure review triggeredDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	26	20	6	32	26	0	2
NYK NYK has 24 conditional decision branches and 19 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Conditional path map with explicit evidence gapsCap context:Second apron pressure review triggeredDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	24	19	5	29	24	24	2
BRK BRK has 22 conditional decision branches and 18 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Conditional path map with explicit evidence gapsCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	22	18	4	26	22	22	6
MIL MIL has 22 conditional decision branches and 18 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:First apron pressure review triggeredDraft:WithheldWithheld — No future pick control evidence	22	18	3	4	22	45	6
MIN MIN has 22 conditional decision branches and 18 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Conditional path map with explicit evidence gapsCap context:First apron pressure review triggeredDraft:WithheldWithheld — No future pick control evidence	22	18	4	4	22	44	0
TOR TOR has 22 conditional decision branches and 18 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Conditional path map with explicit evidence gapsCap context:Tax pressure review triggeredDraft:WithheldWithheld — No future pick control evidence	22	18	3	4	22	45	4
DET DET has 18 conditional decision branches and 17 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Conditional path map with explicit evidence gapsCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:WithheldWithheld — No future pick control evidence	18	17	1	1	18	36	4
MEM MEM has 20 conditional decision branches and 17 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Conditional path map with explicit evidence gapsCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:WithheldWithheld — No future pick control evidence	20	17	0	3	20	43	20
WAS WAS has 18 conditional decision branches and 16 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Conditional path map with explicit evidence gapsCap context:Tax pressure review triggeredDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	18	16	2	20	18	18	2
CHO CHO has 18 conditional decision branches and 15 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Conditional path map with explicit evidence gapsCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:WithheldWithheld — No future pick control evidence	18	15	3	3	18	36	2
CLE CLE has 14 conditional decision branches and 14 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Conditional path map with explicit evidence gapsCap context:Second apron pressure review triggeredDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	14	14	0	14	14	14	14
HOU HOU has 18 conditional decision branches and 14 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:First apron pressure review triggeredDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	18	14	4	22	18	18	2
LAC LAC has 14 conditional decision branches and 13 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Conditional path map with explicit evidence gapsCap context:Tax pressure review triggeredDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	14	13	0	15	14	15	14
BOS BOS has 16 conditional decision branches and 12 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Conditional path map with explicit evidence gapsCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	16	12	1	20	16	19	8
SAS SAS has 14 conditional decision branches and 12 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Conditional path map with explicit evidence gapsCap context:Tax pressure review triggeredDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	14	12	2	16	14	14	0
CHI CHI has 14 conditional decision branches and 11 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Conditional path map with explicit evidence gapsCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	14	11	0	17	14	17	14
ORL ORL has 12 conditional decision branches and 11 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Conditional path map with explicit evidence gapsCap context:Tax pressure review triggeredDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	12	11	1	13	12	12	2
ATL ATL has 10 conditional decision branches and 9 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Conditional path map with explicit evidence gapsCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	10	9	0	11	10	11	10

League rows compare evidence coverage and conditional path counts, not team quality or front-office success.