Gingeball

League

Five decision-pressure lenses — one hub for the whole league. No team score, no player grade, no front-office ranking.

As ofLatest

Teams

Lenses

2018-19

Season

2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26

Decision volume Planning windows Sequencing workload Keep/exit optionality Competitive window

Which teams face multi-player planning windows, and where do the scenarios lack evidence?

#	Team	Windows	Scenarios	2 at once

Asset-valuation archive (legacy surfaces)

trades draft free agency front office decisions franchise development player ancestry outcome explorer value sources

1	MIA Heat MIA has 2 multi-player planning windows and 12 fully enumerated conditional branch combinations. Overlap counts identify review pressure, not preferred outcomes. Coverage:Conditional stress map with named evidence gapsCap context:First apron pressure review triggered roster on the Player Board →	2	12	1	1	12	12	0
2	LAL Lakers LAL has 1 multi-player planning windows and 8 fully enumerated conditional branch combinations. Overlap counts identify review pressure, not preferred outcomes. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron trigger roster on the Player Board →	1	8	0	1
3	ATL Hawks ATL has 1 multi-player planning windows and 4 fully enumerated conditional branch combinations. Overlap counts identify review pressure, not preferred outcomes. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron trigger roster on the Player Board →	1	4	1	0
4	DAL Mavericks DAL has 1 multi-player planning windows and 4 fully enumerated conditional branch combinations. Overlap counts identify review pressure, not preferred outcomes. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron trigger roster on the Player Board →	1	4	1	0
5	MIN Timberwolves MIN has 1 multi-player planning windows and 4 fully enumerated conditional branch combinations. Overlap counts identify review pressure, not preferred outcomes. Coverage:Conditional stress map with named evidence gapsCap context:Cap position observed; no apron trigger roster on the Player Board →	1	4	1	0
6	NOP Pelicans NOP has 1 multi-player planning windows and 4 fully enumerated conditional branch combinations. Overlap counts identify review pressure, not preferred outcomes. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron trigger roster on the Player Board →	1	4	1	0
7	SAC Kings SAC has 1 multi-player planning windows and 4 fully enumerated conditional branch combinations. Overlap counts identify review pressure, not preferred outcomes. Coverage:Conditional stress map with named evidence gapsCap context:Cap position observed; no apron trigger roster on the Player Board →	1	4	1	0
8	TOR Raptors TOR has 1 multi-player planning windows and 4 fully enumerated conditional branch combinations. Overlap counts identify review pressure, not preferred outcomes. Coverage:Conditional stress map with named evidence gapsCap context:First apron pressure review triggered roster on the Player Board →	1	4	1	0
9	BOS Celtics BOS has no supported multi-player decision planning window in this team-season. Coverage:No multi decision planning windowCap context:Tax pressure review triggered roster on the Player Board →	0	0	0	0	0
10	BRK Nets BRK has no supported multi-player decision planning window in this team-season. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron trigger roster on the Player Board →	0	0	0	0	0
11	CHI Bulls CHI has no supported multi-player decision planning window in this team-season. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron trigger roster on the Player Board →	0	0	0	0	0
12	CHO Hornets CHO has no supported multi-player decision planning window in this team-season. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron trigger roster on the Player Board →	0	0	0	0	0
13	CLE Cavaliers CLE has no supported multi-player decision planning window in this team-season. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron trigger roster on the Player Board →	0	0	0	0	0
14	DEN Nuggets DEN has no supported multi-player decision planning window in this team-season. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron trigger roster on the Player Board →	0	0	0	0	0
15	DET Pistons DET has no supported multi-player decision planning window in this team-season. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron trigger roster on the Player Board →	0	0	0	0	0
16	GSW Warriors GSW has no supported multi-player decision planning window in this team-season. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:First apron pressure review triggered roster on the Player Board →	0	0	0	0	0
17	HOU Rockets HOU has no supported multi-player decision planning window in this team-season. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Tax pressure review triggered roster on the Player Board →	0	0	0	0	0
18	IND Pacers IND has no supported multi-player decision planning window in this team-season. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron trigger roster on the Player Board →	0	0	0	0	0
19	LAC Clippers LAC has no supported multi-player decision planning window in this team-season. Coverage:No multi decision planning windowCap context:Cap position observed; no apron trigger roster on the Player Board →	0	0	0	0	0
20	MEM Grizzlies MEM has no supported multi-player decision planning window in this team-season. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Tax pressure review triggered roster on the Player Board →	0	0	0	0	0
21	MIL Bucks MIL has no supported multi-player decision planning window in this team-season. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:First apron pressure review triggered roster on the Player Board →	0	0	0	0	0
22	NYK Knicks NYK has no supported multi-player decision planning window in this team-season. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron trigger roster on the Player Board →	0	0	0	0	0
23	OKC Thunder OKC has no supported multi-player decision planning window in this team-season. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:First apron pressure review triggered roster on the Player Board →	0	0	0	0	0
24	ORL Magic ORL has no supported multi-player decision planning window in this team-season. Coverage:No multi decision planning windowCap context:Cap position observed; no apron trigger roster on the Player Board →	0	0	0	0	0
25	PHI 76ers PHI has no supported multi-player decision planning window in this team-season. Coverage:No multi decision planning windowCap context:Cap position observed; no apron trigger roster on the Player Board →	0	0	0	0	0
26	PHX Suns PHX has no supported multi-player decision planning window in this team-season. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron trigger roster on the Player Board →	0	0	0	0	0
27	POR Blazers POR has no supported multi-player decision planning window in this team-season. Coverage:No multi decision planning windowCap context:Cap position observed; no apron trigger roster on the Player Board →	0	0	0	0	0
28	SAS Spurs SAS has no supported multi-player decision planning window in this team-season. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron trigger roster on the Player Board →	0	0	0	0	0
29	UTA Jazz UTA has no supported multi-player decision planning window in this team-season. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron trigger roster on the Player Board →	0	0	0	0	0
30	WAS Wizards WAS has no supported multi-player decision planning window in this team-season. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron trigger roster on the Player Board →	0	0	0	0	0