Which supported roster decisions should be reviewed first, what later choices depend on them, and what remains unknowable?
BRK has 3 actionable review nodes, but 1 nodes cannot be placed on a supported planning date.
PartialPartial contract identity coverage3 actionable of 7 nodes · 6 planning anchors · 1 unresolved · 0 exact dates supported
The decision map
Planning anchors are staff workflow dates — grouped, never promoted to exact deadlines.
D'Angelo RussellExtension reviewGeneral anniversary candidate available exact extension eligibility unresolvedteam and player decideReview a possible extension path for D'Angelo Russell before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.
Extension is agreedNo extension is recorded before the horizon
+What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Extension review candidate visible exact eligibility and terms unresolvedCBA legality: Exact extension eligibility maximum terms and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Player willingness team willingness and price unresolvedSalary input: Extension salary terms unavailableDate basis: Anniversary review candidate — not a deadlineIf “Extension is agreed”: D'Angelo Russell would remain under new control, but eligibility, terms, willingness, price and future cap effects are unavailable.If “No extension is recorded before the horizon”: The existing reported control horizon for D'Angelo Russell remains the planning boundary; no outcome is inferred.
Joe HarrisContract control horizonContract control horizon visible free agency status unresolvedTeam and player market decideReview the visible contract-control boundary for Joe Harris. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
+What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Planning boundary visible free agency and retention rights unresolvedCBA legality: Free agency retention rights and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Future market price unresolvedSalary input: Contract horizon salary beyond boundary unresolvedDate basis: Season boundary proxy
Caris LeVertExtension reviewGeneral anniversary candidate available exact extension eligibility unresolvedteam and player decideReview a possible extension path for Caris LeVert before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.
Extension is agreedNo extension is recorded before the horizon
+What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Extension review candidate visible exact eligibility and terms unresolvedCBA legality: Exact extension eligibility maximum terms and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Player willingness team willingness and price unresolvedSalary input: Extension salary terms unavailableDate basis: Anniversary review candidate — not a deadlineIf “Extension is agreed”: Caris LeVert would remain under new control, but eligibility, terms, willingness, price and future cap effects are unavailable.If “No extension is recorded before the horizon”: The existing reported control horizon for Caris LeVert remains the planning boundary; no outcome is inferred.
D'Angelo RussellContract control horizonContract control horizon visible free agency status unresolvedTeam and player market decideReview the visible contract-control boundary for D'Angelo Russell. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
+What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Planning boundary visible free agency and retention rights unresolvedCBA legality: Free agency retention rights and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Future market price unresolvedSalary input: Contract horizon salary beyond boundary unresolvedDate basis: Season boundary proxy
Caris LeVertContract control horizonContract control horizon visible free agency status unresolvedTeam and player market decideReview the visible contract-control boundary for Caris LeVert. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
+What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Planning boundary visible free agency and retention rights unresolvedCBA legality: Free agency retention rights and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Future market price unresolvedSalary input: Contract horizon salary beyond boundary unresolvedDate basis: Season boundary proxy
Jarrett AllenContract control horizonContract control horizon visible free agency status unresolvedTeam and player market decideReview the visible contract-control boundary for Jarrett Allen. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
+What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Planning boundary visible free agency and retention rights unresolvedCBA legality: Free agency retention rights and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Future market price unresolvedSalary input: Contract horizon salary beyond boundary unresolvedDate basis: Season boundary proxy
Joe HarrisExtension reviewReview triggered exact extension eligibility unresolvedteam and player decideReview a possible extension path for Joe Harris before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.
Extension is agreedNo extension is recorded before the horizon
+What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Withheld — Extension candidate date and exact eligibility unresolvedCBA legality: Exact extension eligibility maximum terms and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Player willingness team willingness and price unresolvedSalary input: Extension salary terms unavailableDate basis: UnresolvedIf “Extension is agreed”: Joe Harris would remain under new control, but eligibility, terms, willingness, price and future cap effects are unavailable.If “No extension is recorded before the horizon”: The existing reported control horizon for Joe Harris remains the planning boundary; no outcome is inferred.
Shared planning dates
Decisions that share a planning date — review pressure, not a claimed order.Jul 10, 20171 decision · 1 player
One review node uses this planning anchor for BRK. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.
Jun 30, 20181 decision · 1 player
One review node uses this planning anchor for BRK. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.
Jul 14, 20181 decision · 1 player
One review node uses this planning anchor for BRK. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.
Jun 30, 20191 decision · 1 player
One review node uses this planning anchor for BRK. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.
Jun 30, 20201 decision · 1 player
One review node uses this planning anchor for BRK. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.
Jun 30, 20211 decision · 1 player
One review node uses this planning anchor for BRK. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.
Connected decisions
Same player, same contract — one decision affects the other.D'Angelo RussellExtension review before the contract horizonJul 10, 2017 → Jun 30, 2019
The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.
Caris LeVertExtension review before the contract horizonJul 14, 2018 → Jun 30, 2020
The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.
Joe HarrisExtension review before the contract horizonno date → Jun 30, 2018
The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.
Planning anchors are not automatically exact contract deadlines.
A CBA outside date is an upper bound; an individual contract may require an earlier choice.
Current cap context is not a recalculated future branch result.
Unknown cap holds, rights, exceptions, roster effects, market prices and legal mechanics remain unresolved.
Branches are conditional planning frames, not probabilities or recommendations.
Decision sequence, reported salary, current cap position, roster effect, CBA legality, market price, basketball evidence and outcome evidence remain separate. No blended score or automatic action is produced.