As ofLatest

Cleveland Cavaliers

2019-20

2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26

Latest available releaseLive database

Which supported roster decisions should be reviewed first, what later choices depend on them, and what remains unknowable?

CLE has 2 actionable review nodes with planning anchors. Exact contract deadlines and legal outcomes remain unresolved.

PartialPartial contract identity coverage2 actionable of 5 nodes · 5 planning anchors · 0 unresolved · 0 exact dates supported

The decision map

Planning anchors are staff workflow dates — grouped, never promoted to exact deadlines.

Jul 9, 2018

Kevin LoveExtension reviewGeneral anniversary candidate available exact extension eligibility unresolvedteam and player decide

Review a possible extension path for Kevin Love before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.

Extension is agreedNo extension is recorded before the horizon

What is and is not resolved

Readiness: Extension review candidate visible exact eligibility and terms unresolvedCBA legality: Exact extension eligibility maximum terms and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Player willingness team willingness and price unresolvedSalary input: Extension salary terms unavailableDate basis: Anniversary review candidate — not a deadlineIf “Extension is agreed”: Kevin Love would remain under new control, but eligibility, terms, willingness, price and future cap effects are unavailable.If “No extension is recorded before the horizon”: The existing reported control horizon for Kevin Love remains the planning boundary; no outcome is inferred.

Jul 12, 2019

Cedi OsmanExtension reviewGeneral anniversary candidate available exact extension eligibility unresolvedteam and player decide

Review a possible extension path for Cedi Osman before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.

Extension is agreedNo extension is recorded before the horizon

What is and is not resolved

Readiness: Extension review candidate visible exact eligibility and terms unresolvedCBA legality: Exact extension eligibility maximum terms and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Player willingness team willingness and price unresolvedSalary input: Extension salary terms unavailableDate basis: Anniversary review candidate — not a deadlineIf “Extension is agreed”: Cedi Osman would remain under new control, but eligibility, terms, willingness, price and future cap effects are unavailable.If “No extension is recorded before the horizon”: The existing reported control horizon for Cedi Osman remains the planning boundary; no outcome is inferred.

Jun 30, 2020

2 decisions share this date

Cedi OsmanContract control horizonContract control horizon visible free agency status unresolvedTeam and player market decide

Review the visible contract-control boundary for Cedi Osman. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.

What is and is not resolved

Readiness: Planning boundary visible free agency and retention rights unresolvedCBA legality: Free agency retention rights and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Future market price unresolvedSalary input: Contract horizon salary beyond boundary unresolvedDate basis: Season boundary proxy

Kevin LoveContract control horizonContract control horizon visible free agency status unresolvedTeam and player market decide

Review the visible contract-control boundary for Kevin Love. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.

What is and is not resolved

Jun 30, 2023

Larry Nance Jr.Contract control horizonContract control horizon visible free agency status unresolvedTeam and player market decide

Review the visible contract-control boundary for Larry Nance Jr.. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.

What is and is not resolved

Shared planning dates

Decisions that share a planning date — review pressure, not a claimed order.

Jul 9, 20181 decision · 1 player

One review node uses this planning anchor for CLE. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.

Jul 12, 20191 decision · 1 player

One review node uses this planning anchor for CLE. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.

Jun 30, 20202 decisions · 2 players

2 review nodes share this planning anchor for CLE. They are grouped for staff workflow, not claimed as simultaneous contract deadlines.

Jun 30, 20231 decision · 1 player

One review node uses this planning anchor for CLE. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.

Connected decisions

Same player, same contract — one decision affects the other.

Kevin LoveExtension review before the contract horizonJul 9, 2018 → Jun 30, 2020

The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.

Cedi OsmanExtension review before the contract horizonJul 12, 2019 → Jun 30, 2020

The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.

Planning anchors are not automatically exact contract deadlines.

A CBA outside date is an upper bound; an individual contract may require an earlier choice.

Current cap context is not a recalculated future branch result.

Unknown cap holds, rights, exceptions, roster effects, market prices and legal mechanics remain unresolved.

Branches are conditional planning frames, not probabilities or recommendations.

Decision sequence, reported salary, current cap position, roster effect, CBA legality, market price, basketball evidence and outcome evidence remain separate. No blended score or automatic action is produced.