← Team Metrics
Latest

Denver Nuggets

2016-17
2016-172017-182018-192019-202020-212021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26
Latest available releaseEvidence released Aug 22, 2026, 8:30 PM UTCLive database

What were the Denver Nuggets in 2016-17, and what needed front-office attention?

DEN 2016-17: the clearest roster problems were Defensive event creation, Rim protection. The strongest covered areas were Interior finishing, Rim pressure, Creation. The main rotation-player dependency cases were Jameer Nelson. Structural basketball need, injuries, replacement lineups, and financial constraints are reported separately.

CoveragePartial8 supported · 3 withheld
Cap positionUnder cap on selected player charges
Next decision dateNo calendar release at this as-of time

What can be trusted

Supported strengths — production, who carries it, and what money is already committed.
Interior finishing
96th percentile
Nikola Jokic carries 23.2%
Availability: No governed recent availability evidence for this seasonMoney: Heavy or redundant salary already committed here
Full reading

DEN 2016-17 Interior finishing: this was a team strength; production ranked at the 96.2 league percentile. Nikola Jokic supplied 23.2% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season. The team already committed substantial or redundant cap resources here.

Rim pressure
96th percentile
Danilo Gallinari carries 22.9%
Availability: No governed recent availability evidence for this seasonMoney: Heavy or redundant salary already committed here
Full reading

DEN 2016-17 Rim pressure: this was a team strength; production ranked at the 96.2 league percentile. Danilo Gallinari supplied 22.9% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season. The team already committed substantial or redundant cap resources here.

Creation
89th percentile
Jameer Nelson carries 24.2%
Availability: No governed recent availability evidence for this seasonMoney: Balanced or context-dependent salary commitment
Full reading

DEN 2016-17 Creation: this was a team strength; production ranked at the 88.5 league percentile. Jameer Nelson supplied 24.2% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season. Financial commitment is shown separately and does not determine basketball quality.

What needs attention

The clearest roster problems the evidence supports.
Defensive event creation
0th percentile
Gary Harris carries 21.6%
Availability: No governed recent availability evidence for this seasonMoney: Comparatively little salary committed to a critical need
Full reading

DEN 2016-17 Defensive event creation: this was one of the team's clearest roster problems; production ranked at the 0.0 league percentile. Gary Harris supplied 21.6% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season. The cap allocation to this critical need was comparatively low.

Rim protection
12th percentile
Wilson Chandler carries 32.7%
Availability: No governed recent availability evidence for this seasonMoney: Comparatively little salary committed to a critical need
Full reading

DEN 2016-17 Rim protection: this was one of the team's clearest roster problems; production ranked at the 11.5 league percentile. Wilson Chandler supplied 32.7% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season. The cap allocation to this critical need was comparatively low.

Every covered basketball function (11)
FunctionReadingLeague percentileLargest contributorRecent availabilitySalary commitment
CreationSupportedTeam strength89th percentileJameer Nelson · 24.2%No recent availability layer for this seasonBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
Defensive event creationSupportedCritical team problem0th percentileGary Harris · 21.6%No recent availability layer for this seasonComparatively little salary committed to a critical need
Interior finishingSupportedTeam strength96th percentileNikola Jokic · 23.2%No recent availability layer for this seasonHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Passing connectivitySupportedTeam strength89th percentileJameer Nelson · 24.8%No recent availability layer for this seasonBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
Point-of-attack defense proxyWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldEmmanuel MudiayNo recent availability layer for this seasonBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
ReboundingSupportedTeam strength85th percentileNikola Jokic · 27.1%No recent availability layer for this seasonHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Rim pressureSupportedTeam strength96th percentileDanilo Gallinari · 22.9%No recent availability layer for this seasonHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Rim protectionSupportedCritical team problem12th percentileWilson Chandler · 32.7%No recent availability layer for this seasonComparatively little salary committed to a critical need
ScreeningWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldEmmanuel MudiayNo recent availability layer for this seasonBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
Shooting and spacingSupportedMiddle of the league50th percentileGary Harris · 24.1%No recent availability layer for this seasonBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
Switch coverage proxyWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldEmmanuel MudiayNo recent availability layer for this seasonBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment

Who the team depends on

What disappears when a player is removed — and whether an observed replacement five exists.
Jameer Nelson
Lineup performance dependence

DEN lineups performed 4.8 points per 100 possessions better with Jameer Nelson than without him. The best supported alternative was [Wilson Chandler, Danilo Gallinari, Gary Harris, Nikola Jokic, Emmanuel Mudiay] over 396 possessions.

rotation 52%loses 24.8% of passing connectivity
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Jameer Nelson

Wilson Chandler · Danilo Gallinari · Gary Harris · Nikola Jokic · Emmanuel Mudiay

shrunk net 1.823 over 396 possessions

on floor 3,772 possessions · off floor 3,525 possessions

Function loss, lineup performance, and replacement-lineup evidence remain separate; none is causal player value.

What injuries change

Recent absences and the basketball needs they created or worsened.

No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season.

Where money is tied up

Cap position and salary allocation — shown beside the basketball picture, never blended into it.
SupportedSelected player charges appeared below the cap, but holds and incomplete roster charges prevent a clean cap-room claim.
Selected player charges
$81.6M
Share of cap
87%
Tax line
$31.6M under
First apron
$35.6M under
Second apron
No governed line that season

Most salary is mapped to interior finishing; the highest-need area is defensive event creation. Salary-to-function mapping covers 88% of charges.

Exact figures
Salary cap: $94,143,000Luxury tax line: $113,287,000First apron: $117,287,000Second apron: Selected player charges: $81,641,960Source-reported payroll: $83,836,460 (source-named payroll total; not relabeled as cash or cap)

Exact transaction legality withheld — no exception-usage, cap-hold, and transaction ledger evidence.

What the evidence cannot answer

Deliberate abstentions — where the database refuses a conclusion rather than guessing.
PartialTeam picture available; recent availability layer unavailable8 of 11 functions supported
  • Point-of-attack defense proxy: Basketball conclusion withheld
  • Screening: Basketball conclusion withheld
  • Switch coverage proxy: Basketball conclusion withheld

Exact transaction legality: Exact transaction legality withheld — no exception-usage, cap-hold, and transaction ledger evidence

Team-season situation report. Structural basketball quality, recent availability, player dependence, replacement lineups, and financial position remain separate. No acquisition recommendation, transaction grade, coaching grade, outcome claim, or causal value is inferred.