← Team Metrics
Latest

Detroit Pistons

2016-17
2016-172017-182018-192019-202020-212021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26
Latest available releaseEvidence released Aug 22, 2026, 8:30 PM UTCLive database

What were the Detroit Pistons in 2016-17, and what needed front-office attention?

DET 2016-17: the clearest roster problems were Shooting and spacing, Creation, Passing connectivity. The strongest covered areas were Rebounding, Interior finishing. The main rotation-player dependency cases were Andre Drummond, Tobias Harris, Ish Smith, Stanley Johnson, Aron Baynes. Structural basketball need, injuries, replacement lineups, and financial constraints are reported separately.

CoveragePartial8 supported · 3 withheld
Cap positionOver the cap, below the tax line, on selected player charges
Next decision dateJun 29, 2017 · 5 events →

What can be trusted

Supported strengths — production, who carries it, and what money is already committed.
Rebounding
100th percentile
Andre Drummond carries 34.2%
Availability: No governed recent availability evidence for this seasonMoney: Balanced or context-dependent salary commitment
Full reading

DET 2016-17 Rebounding: this was a team strength; production ranked at the 100.0 league percentile. Andre Drummond supplied 34.2% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season. Financial commitment is shown separately and does not determine basketball quality.

Interior finishing
85th percentile
Andre Drummond carries 28.4%
Availability: No governed recent availability evidence for this seasonMoney: Heavy or redundant salary already committed here
Full reading

DET 2016-17 Interior finishing: this was a team strength; production ranked at the 84.6 league percentile. Andre Drummond supplied 28.4% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season. The team already committed substantial or redundant cap resources here.

What needs attention

The clearest roster problems the evidence supports.
Shooting and spacing
4th percentile
Kentavious Caldwell-Pope carries 33.0%
Availability: No governed recent availability evidence for this seasonMoney: Comparatively little salary committed to a critical need
Full reading

DET 2016-17 Shooting and spacing: this was one of the team's clearest roster problems; production ranked at the 3.8 league percentile. Kentavious Caldwell-Pope supplied 33.0% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season. The cap allocation to this critical need was comparatively low.

Creation
0th percentile
Kentavious Caldwell-Pope carries 22.9%
Availability: No governed recent availability evidence for this seasonMoney: Underfunded structural need
Full reading

DET 2016-17 Creation: this was a real roster weakness; production ranked at the 0.0 league percentile. Kentavious Caldwell-Pope supplied 22.9% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season. The cap allocation to this structural need was comparatively low.

Passing connectivity
8th percentile
Kentavious Caldwell-Pope carries 27.4%
Availability: No governed recent availability evidence for this seasonMoney: Underfunded structural need
Full reading

DET 2016-17 Passing connectivity: this was a real roster weakness; production ranked at the 7.7 league percentile. Kentavious Caldwell-Pope supplied 27.4% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season. The cap allocation to this structural need was comparatively low.

Every covered basketball function (11)
FunctionReadingLeague percentileLargest contributorRecent availabilitySalary commitment
CreationSupportedStructural team problem0th percentileKentavious Caldwell-Pope · 22.9%No recent availability layer for this seasonUnderfunded structural need
Defensive event creationSupportedMiddle-tier area with one-player risk42nd percentileAndre Drummond · 46.8%No recent availability layer for this seasonCost concentrated in one provider
Interior finishingSupportedTeam strength85th percentileAndre Drummond · 28.4%No recent availability layer for this seasonHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Passing connectivitySupportedStructural team problem8th percentileKentavious Caldwell-Pope · 27.4%No recent availability layer for this seasonUnderfunded structural need
Point-of-attack defense proxyWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldStanley JohnsonNo recent availability layer for this seasonBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
ReboundingSupportedTeam strength100th percentileAndre Drummond · 34.2%No recent availability layer for this seasonBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
Rim pressureSupportedStructural team problem15th percentileTobias Harris · 38.4%No recent availability layer for this seasonHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Rim protectionSupportedMiddle of the league50th percentileAndre Drummond · 25.2%No recent availability layer for this seasonHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
ScreeningWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldStanley JohnsonNo recent availability layer for this seasonBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
Shooting and spacingSupportedCritical team problem4th percentileKentavious Caldwell-Pope · 33.0%No recent availability layer for this seasonComparatively little salary committed to a critical need
Switch coverage proxyWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldStanley JohnsonNo recent availability layer for this seasonBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment

Who the team depends on

What disappears when a player is removed — and whether an observed replacement five exists.
Andre Drummond
Single-skill dependence

DET did not have strong functional backup for Andre Drummond in rebounding; removing him cost about 34.2% of the team's production in that area. The next observed option was Jon Leuer.

rotation 61%loses 34.2% of rebounding
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Andre Drummond

Ish Smith · Marcus Morris Sr. · Tobias Harris · Aron Baynes · Kentavious Caldwell-Pope

shrunk net 2.751 over 180 possessions — small sample

on floor 4,244 possessions · off floor 2,803 possessions

Tobias Harris
Lineup performance dependence

DET lineups performed 3.4 points per 100 possessions better with Tobias Harris than without him. The best supported alternative was [Ish Smith, Marcus Morris Sr., Jon Leuer, Andre Drummond, Kentavious Caldwell-Pope] over 324 possessions.

rotation 65%loses 24.3% of interior finishing
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Tobias Harris

Ish Smith · Marcus Morris Sr. · Jon Leuer · Andre Drummond · Kentavious Caldwell-Pope

shrunk net -1.94 over 324 possessions

on floor 4,564 possessions · off floor 2,471 possessions

Ish Smith
Lineup performance dependence

DET lineups performed 4.8 points per 100 possessions better with Ish Smith than without him. The best supported alternative was [Marcus Morris Sr., Reggie Jackson, Jon Leuer, Andre Drummond, Kentavious Caldwell-Pope] over 751 possessions.

rotation 49%loses 24.0% of passing connectivity
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Ish Smith

Marcus Morris Sr. · Reggie Jackson · Jon Leuer · Andre Drummond · Kentavious Caldwell-Pope

shrunk net -5.417 over 751 possessions

on floor 3,483 possessions · off floor 3,549 possessions

Stanley Johnson
Lineup performance dependence

DET lineups performed 4.2 points per 100 possessions better with Stanley Johnson than without him. The best supported alternative was [Ish Smith, Marcus Morris Sr., Tobias Harris, Aron Baynes, Kentavious Caldwell-Pope] over 180 possessions.

rotation 35%loses 17.9% of defensive event creation
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Stanley Johnson

Ish Smith · Marcus Morris Sr. · Tobias Harris · Aron Baynes · Kentavious Caldwell-Pope

shrunk net 2.751 over 180 possessions — small sample

on floor 2,401 possessions · off floor 4,646 possessions

Aron Baynes
Lineup performance dependence

DET lineups performed 8.8 points per 100 possessions better with Aron Baynes than without him. The best supported alternative was [Ish Smith, Tobias Harris, Jon Leuer, Andre Drummond, Kentavious Caldwell-Pope] over 188 possessions.

rotation 29%loses 16.9% of rim protection
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Aron Baynes

Ish Smith · Tobias Harris · Jon Leuer · Andre Drummond · Kentavious Caldwell-Pope

shrunk net 1.174 over 188 possessions — small sample

on floor 2,072 possessions · off floor 4,975 possessions

Function loss, lineup performance, and replacement-lineup evidence remain separate; none is causal player value.

What injuries change

Recent absences and the basketball needs they created or worsened.

No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season.

Where money is tied up

Cap position and salary allocation — shown beside the basketball picture, never blended into it.
WithheldThe team was over the cap but below the tax on selected player charges; exception detail remains withheld.
Selected player charges
$101.1M
Share of cap
107%
Tax line
$12.2M under
First apron
$16.2M under
Second apron
No governed line that season

Most salary is mapped to interior finishing; the highest-need area is shooting and spacing. Salary-to-function mapping covers 100% of charges.

Exact figures
Salary cap: $94,143,000Luxury tax line: $113,287,000First apron: $117,287,000Second apron: Selected player charges: $101,131,259Source-reported payroll: $106,492,988 (source-named payroll total; not relabeled as cash or cap)

Exact transaction legality withheld — no exception-usage, cap-hold, and transaction ledger evidence.

What the evidence cannot answer

Deliberate abstentions — where the database refuses a conclusion rather than guessing.
PartialTeam picture available; recent availability layer unavailable8 of 11 functions supported
  • Point-of-attack defense proxy: Basketball conclusion withheld
  • Screening: Basketball conclusion withheld
  • Switch coverage proxy: Basketball conclusion withheld

Exact transaction legality: Exact transaction legality withheld — no exception-usage, cap-hold, and transaction ledger evidence

Team-season situation report. Structural basketball quality, recent availability, player dependence, replacement lineups, and financial position remain separate. No acquisition recommendation, transaction grade, coaching grade, outcome claim, or causal value is inferred.