← Team Metrics
Latest

Golden State Warriors

2016-17
2016-172017-182018-192019-202020-212021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26
Latest available releaseEvidence released Aug 22, 2026, 8:30 PM UTCLive database

What were the Golden State Warriors in 2016-17, and what needed front-office attention?

GSW 2016-17: no supported structural problem was identified. The strongest covered areas were Creation, Defensive event creation, Passing connectivity. The main rotation-player dependency cases were Draymond Green, Stephen Curry, Kevin Durant, Zaza Pachulia, JaVale McGee. Structural basketball need, injuries, replacement lineups, and financial constraints are reported separately.

CoveragePartial8 supported · 3 withheld
Cap positionOver the cap, below the tax line, on selected player charges
Next decision dateNo calendar release at this as-of time

What can be trusted

Supported strengths — production, who carries it, and what money is already committed.
Creation
100th percentile
Stephen Curry carries 23.7%
Availability: No governed recent availability evidence for this seasonMoney: Heavy or redundant salary already committed here
Full reading

GSW 2016-17 Creation: this was a team strength; production ranked at the 100.0 league percentile. Stephen Curry supplied 23.7% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season. The team already committed substantial or redundant cap resources here.

Defensive event creation
100th percentile
Draymond Green carries 26.5%
Availability: No governed recent availability evidence for this seasonMoney: Heavy or redundant salary already committed here
Full reading

GSW 2016-17 Defensive event creation: this was a team strength; production ranked at the 100.0 league percentile. Draymond Green supplied 26.5% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season. The team already committed substantial or redundant cap resources here.

Passing connectivity
100th percentile
Stephen Curry carries 22.2%
Availability: No governed recent availability evidence for this seasonMoney: Heavy or redundant salary already committed here
Full reading

GSW 2016-17 Passing connectivity: this was a team strength; production ranked at the 100.0 league percentile. Stephen Curry supplied 22.2% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season. The team already committed substantial or redundant cap resources here.

What needs attention

The clearest roster problems the evidence supports.

No supported roster problems are on record for this season — team picture available; recent availability layer unavailable.

Every covered basketball function (11)
FunctionReadingLeague percentileLargest contributorRecent availabilitySalary commitment
CreationSupportedTeam strength100th percentileStephen Curry · 23.7%No recent availability layer for this seasonHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Defensive event creationSupportedTeam strength100th percentileDraymond Green · 26.5%No recent availability layer for this seasonHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Interior finishingSupportedTeam strength81st percentileKlay Thompson · 24.6%No recent availability layer for this seasonHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Passing connectivitySupportedTeam strength100th percentileStephen Curry · 22.2%No recent availability layer for this seasonHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Point-of-attack defense proxyWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldKevon LooneyNo recent availability layer for this seasonBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
ReboundingSupportedMiddle of the league31st percentileDraymond Green · 28.5%No recent availability layer for this seasonBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
Rim pressureSupportedTeam strength100th percentileKevin Durant · 25.2%No recent availability layer for this seasonHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Rim protectionSupportedTeam strength92nd percentileDraymond Green · 30.7%No recent availability layer for this seasonHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
ScreeningWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldKevon LooneyNo recent availability layer for this seasonBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
Shooting and spacingSupportedTeam strength100th percentileStephen Curry · 33.5%No recent availability layer for this seasonHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Switch coverage proxyWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldKevon LooneyNo recent availability layer for this seasonBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment

Who the team depends on

What disappears when a player is removed — and whether an observed replacement five exists.
Draymond Green
Critical basketball and lineup dependence

GSW was highly dependent on Draymond Green. Removing him cost about 26.5% of event creation production, and lineups with him performed 10.8 points per 100 possessions better than lineups without him. The best supported replacement group was [David West, Shaun Livingston, Andre Iguodala, Kevin Durant, Klay Thompson] over 309 possessions.

rotation 64%loses 26.5% of defensive event creation
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Draymond Green

David West · Shaun Livingston · Andre Iguodala · Kevin Durant · Klay Thompson

shrunk net 5.424 over 309 possessions

on floor 5,786 possessions · off floor 3,108 possessions

Stephen Curry
Lineup performance dependence

GSW lineups performed 16.4 points per 100 possessions better with Stephen Curry than without him. The best supported alternative was [David West, Shaun Livingston, Andre Iguodala, Kevin Durant, Klay Thompson] over 309 possessions.

rotation 68%loses 22.2% of passing connectivity
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Stephen Curry

David West · Shaun Livingston · Andre Iguodala · Kevin Durant · Klay Thompson

shrunk net 5.424 over 309 possessions

on floor 6,170 possessions · off floor 2,680 possessions

Kevin Durant
Lineup performance dependence

GSW lineups performed 5.8 points per 100 possessions better with Kevin Durant than without him. The best supported alternative was [Zaza Pachulia, Stephen Curry, Klay Thompson, Draymond Green, Patrick McCaw] over 396 possessions.

rotation 54%loses 15.7% of creation
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Kevin Durant

Zaza Pachulia · Stephen Curry · Klay Thompson · Draymond Green · Patrick McCaw

shrunk net 5.389 over 396 possessions

on floor 4,904 possessions · off floor 3,984 possessions

Zaza Pachulia
Lineup performance dependence

GSW lineups performed 4.3 points per 100 possessions better with Zaza Pachulia than without him. The best supported alternative was [Andre Iguodala, Kevin Durant, Stephen Curry, Klay Thompson, Draymond Green] over 519 possessions.

rotation 31%loses 9.5% of defensive event creation
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Zaza Pachulia

Andre Iguodala · Kevin Durant · Stephen Curry · Klay Thompson · Draymond Green

shrunk net 12.081 over 519 possessions

on floor 2,862 possessions · off floor 6,035 possessions

JaVale McGee
Lineup performance dependence

GSW lineups performed 7.4 points per 100 possessions better with JaVale McGee than without him. The best supported alternative was [Zaza Pachulia, Kevin Durant, Stephen Curry, Klay Thompson, Draymond Green] over 1359 possessions.

rotation 19%loses 8.4% of rim protection
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without JaVale McGee

Zaza Pachulia · Kevin Durant · Stephen Curry · Klay Thompson · Draymond Green

shrunk net 15.062 over 1,359 possessions

on floor 1,682 possessions · off floor 7,215 possessions

Function loss, lineup performance, and replacement-lineup evidence remain separate; none is causal player value.

What injuries change

Recent absences and the basketball needs they created or worsened.

No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season.

Where money is tied up

Cap position and salary allocation — shown beside the basketball picture, never blended into it.
WithheldThe team was over the cap but below the tax on selected player charges; exception detail remains withheld.
Selected player charges
$101.6M
Share of cap
108%
Tax line
$11.7M under
First apron
$15.7M under
Second apron
No governed line that season

Most salary is mapped to passing connectivity; the highest-need area is rebounding. Salary-to-function mapping covers 98% of charges.

Exact figures
Salary cap: $94,143,000Luxury tax line: $113,287,000First apron: $117,287,000Second apron: Selected player charges: $101,584,835Source-reported payroll: $101,584,835 (source-named payroll total; not relabeled as cash or cap)

Exact transaction legality withheld — no exception-usage, cap-hold, and transaction ledger evidence.

What the evidence cannot answer

Deliberate abstentions — where the database refuses a conclusion rather than guessing.
PartialTeam picture available; recent availability layer unavailable8 of 11 functions supported
  • Point-of-attack defense proxy: Basketball conclusion withheld
  • Screening: Basketball conclusion withheld
  • Switch coverage proxy: Basketball conclusion withheld

Exact transaction legality: Exact transaction legality withheld — no exception-usage, cap-hold, and transaction ledger evidence

Team-season situation report. Structural basketball quality, recent availability, player dependence, replacement lineups, and financial position remain separate. No acquisition recommendation, transaction grade, coaching grade, outcome claim, or causal value is inferred.