← Team Metrics
Latest

Memphis Grizzlies

2022-23
2016-172017-182018-192019-202020-212021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26
Latest available releaseLive database

Which supported roster decisions should be reviewed first, what later choices depend on them, and what remains unknowable?

MEM has 3 actionable review nodes, but 1 nodes cannot be placed on a supported planning date.

PartialPartial contract identity coverage3 actionable of 7 nodes · 6 planning anchors · 1 unresolved · 0 exact dates supported

The decision map

Planning anchors are staff workflow dates — grouped, never promoted to exact deadlines.
Feb 5, 2022
Dillon BrooksExtension reviewGeneral anniversary candidate available exact extension eligibility unresolvedteam and player decide

Review a possible extension path for Dillon Brooks before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.

Extension is agreedNo extension is recorded before the horizon
What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Extension review candidate visible exact eligibility and terms unresolvedCBA legality: Exact extension eligibility maximum terms and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Player willingness team willingness and price unresolvedSalary input: Extension salary terms unavailableDate basis: Anniversary review candidate — not a deadlineIf “Extension is agreed”: Dillon Brooks would remain under new control, but eligibility, terms, willingness, price and future cap effects are unavailable.If “No extension is recorded before the horizon”: The existing reported control horizon for Dillon Brooks remains the planning boundary; no outcome is inferred.
Nov 22, 2022
John KoncharExtension reviewGeneral anniversary candidate available exact extension eligibility unresolvedteam and player decide

Review a possible extension path for John Konchar before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.

Extension is agreedNo extension is recorded before the horizon
What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Extension review candidate visible exact eligibility and terms unresolvedCBA legality: Exact extension eligibility maximum terms and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Player willingness team willingness and price unresolvedSalary input: Extension salary terms unavailableDate basis: Anniversary review candidate — not a deadlineIf “Extension is agreed”: John Konchar would remain under new control, but eligibility, terms, willingness, price and future cap effects are unavailable.If “No extension is recorded before the horizon”: The existing reported control horizon for John Konchar remains the planning boundary; no outcome is inferred.
Jun 30, 2023
Dillon BrooksContract control horizonContract control horizon visible free agency status unresolvedTeam and player market decide

Review the visible contract-control boundary for Dillon Brooks. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.

What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Planning boundary visible free agency and retention rights unresolvedCBA legality: Free agency retention rights and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Future market price unresolvedSalary input: Contract horizon salary beyond boundary unresolvedDate basis: Season boundary proxy
Jun 30, 2024
2 decisions share this date
John KoncharContract control horizonContract control horizon visible free agency status unresolvedTeam and player market decide

Review the visible contract-control boundary for John Konchar. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.

What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Planning boundary visible free agency and retention rights unresolvedCBA legality: Free agency retention rights and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Future market price unresolvedSalary input: Contract horizon salary beyond boundary unresolvedDate basis: Season boundary proxy
Tyus JonesContract control horizonContract control horizon visible free agency status unresolvedTeam and player market decide

Review the visible contract-control boundary for Tyus Jones. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.

What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Planning boundary visible free agency and retention rights unresolvedCBA legality: Free agency retention rights and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Future market price unresolvedSalary input: Contract horizon salary beyond boundary unresolvedDate basis: Season boundary proxy
Jun 30, 2026
Jaren Jackson Jr.Contract control horizonContract control horizon visible free agency status unresolvedTeam and player market decide

Review the visible contract-control boundary for Jaren Jackson Jr.. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.

What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Planning boundary visible free agency and retention rights unresolvedCBA legality: Free agency retention rights and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Future market price unresolvedSalary input: Contract horizon salary beyond boundary unresolvedDate basis: Season boundary proxy
No supported date
Tyus JonesExtension reviewReview triggered exact extension eligibility unresolvedteam and player decide

Review a possible extension path for Tyus Jones before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.

Extension is agreedNo extension is recorded before the horizon
What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Withheld — Extension candidate date and exact eligibility unresolvedCBA legality: Exact extension eligibility maximum terms and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Player willingness team willingness and price unresolvedSalary input: Extension salary terms unavailableDate basis: UnresolvedIf “Extension is agreed”: Tyus Jones would remain under new control, but eligibility, terms, willingness, price and future cap effects are unavailable.If “No extension is recorded before the horizon”: The existing reported control horizon for Tyus Jones remains the planning boundary; no outcome is inferred.

Shared planning dates

Decisions that share a planning date — review pressure, not a claimed order.
Feb 5, 20221 decision · 1 player

One review node uses this planning anchor for MEM. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.

Nov 22, 20221 decision · 1 player

One review node uses this planning anchor for MEM. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.

Jun 30, 20231 decision · 1 player

One review node uses this planning anchor for MEM. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.

Jun 30, 20242 decisions · 2 players

2 review nodes share this planning anchor for MEM. They are grouped for staff workflow, not claimed as simultaneous contract deadlines.

Jun 30, 20261 decision · 1 player

One review node uses this planning anchor for MEM. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.

Connected decisions

Same player, same contract — one decision affects the other.
Dillon BrooksExtension review before the contract horizonFeb 5, 2022 Jun 30, 2023

The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.

John KoncharExtension review before the contract horizonNov 22, 2022 Jun 30, 2024

The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.

Tyus JonesExtension review before the contract horizonno date Jun 30, 2024

The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.

Planning anchors are not automatically exact contract deadlines.

A CBA outside date is an upper bound; an individual contract may require an earlier choice.

Current cap context is not a recalculated future branch result.

Unknown cap holds, rights, exceptions, roster effects, market prices and legal mechanics remain unresolved.

Branches are conditional planning frames, not probabilities or recommendations.

Decision sequence, reported salary, current cap position, roster effect, CBA legality, market price, basketball evidence and outcome evidence remain separate. No blended score or automatic action is produced.