← Team Metrics
Latest

Memphis Grizzlies

2024-25
2016-172017-182018-192019-202020-212021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26
Latest available releaseEvidence released Aug 22, 2026, 8:30 PM UTCLive database

What were the Memphis Grizzlies in 2024-25, and what needed front-office attention?

MEM 2024-25: the clearest roster problems were Rebounding. The strongest covered areas were Rim pressure, Rim protection, Defensive event creation. The main rotation-player dependency cases were Ja Morant, Brandon Clarke. Structural basketball need, injuries, replacement lineups, and financial constraints are reported separately.

CoveragePartial8 supported · 3 withheld
Cap positionAt or above the second apron on selected player charges
Next decision dateNo calendar release at this as-of time

What can be trusted

Supported strengths — production, who carries it, and what money is already committed.
Rim pressure
88th percentile
Jaren Jackson Jr. carries 24.4%
Availability: Isolated availability problemMoney: Salary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Full reading

MEM 2024-25 Rim pressure: this was a team strength; production ranked at the 87.5 league percentile. Jaren Jackson Jr. supplied 24.4% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. Availability created or worsened the issue in isolated recent games. Function-level salary allocation was incomplete and is withheld.

Rim protection
79th percentile
Jaren Jackson Jr. carries 33.6%
Availability: Isolated availability problemMoney: Salary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Full reading

MEM 2024-25 Rim protection: this was a team strength; production ranked at the 79.2 league percentile. Jaren Jackson Jr. supplied 33.6% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. Availability created or worsened the issue in isolated recent games. Function-level salary allocation was incomplete and is withheld.

Defensive event creation
75th percentile
Jaren Jackson Jr. carries 26.5%
Availability: Isolated availability problemMoney: Salary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Full reading

MEM 2024-25 Defensive event creation: this was a team strength; production ranked at the 75.0 league percentile. Jaren Jackson Jr. supplied 26.5% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. Availability created or worsened the issue in isolated recent games. Function-level salary allocation was incomplete and is withheld.

What needs attention

The clearest roster problems the evidence supports.
Rebounding
0th percentile
Santi Aldama carries 32.8%
Availability: Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problemMoney: Salary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Full reading

MEM 2024-25 Rebounding: this was a real roster weakness; production ranked at the 0.0 league percentile. Santi Aldama supplied 32.8% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. Absences made the problem worse in 9 of the final 10 covered games. Function-level salary allocation was incomplete and is withheld.

Every covered basketball function (11)
FunctionReadingLeague percentileLargest contributorRecent availabilitySalary commitment
CreationSupportedMiddle of the league42nd percentileJa Morant · 27.6%Isolated availability problemSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Defensive event creationSupportedTeam strength75th percentileJaren Jackson Jr. · 26.5%Isolated availability problemSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Interior finishingSupportedMiddle of the league67th percentileJaren Jackson Jr. · 26.8%Absences repeatedly created a problemSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Passing connectivitySupportedMiddle of the league42nd percentileJa Morant · 26.2%Absences repeatedly created a problemSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Point-of-attack defense proxyWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldJaren Jackson Jr.Recent availability conclusion withheldSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
ReboundingSupportedStructural team problem0th percentileSanti Aldama · 32.8%Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problemSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Rim pressureSupportedTeam strength88th percentileJaren Jackson Jr. · 24.4%Isolated availability problemSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Rim protectionSupportedTeam strength79th percentileJaren Jackson Jr. · 33.6%Isolated availability problemSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
ScreeningWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldZach EdeyRecent availability conclusion withheldSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Shooting and spacingSupportedMiddle of the league67th percentileDesmond Bane · 23.6%Isolated availability problemSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Switch coverage proxyWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldJaren Jackson Jr.Recent availability conclusion withheldSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low

Who the team depends on

What disappears when a player is removed — and whether an observed replacement five exists.
Ja Morant
Single-skill dependence

MEM did not have strong functional backup for Ja Morant in passing; removing him cost about 26.2% of the team's production in that area. The next observed option was Scotty Pippen Jr..

rotation 40%loses 26.2% of passing connectivity
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Ja Morant

Luke Kennard · Jaren Jackson Jr. · Desmond Bane · Zach Edey · Jaylen Wells

shrunk net -1.05 over 202 possessions — small sample

on floor 3,176 possessions · off floor 4,712 possessions

Brandon Clarke
Lineup performance dependence

MEM lineups performed 5.7 points per 100 possessions better with Brandon Clarke than without him. The best supported alternative was [Jaren Jackson Jr., Ja Morant, Desmond Bane, Zach Edey, Jaylen Wells] over 470 possessions.

rotation 29%loses 11.7% of interior finishing
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Brandon Clarke

Jaren Jackson Jr. · Ja Morant · Desmond Bane · Zach Edey · Jaylen Wells

shrunk net 12.886 over 470 possessions

on floor 2,243 possessions · off floor 5,645 possessions

Function loss, lineup performance, and replacement-lineup evidence remain separate; none is causal player value.

What injuries change

Recent absences and the basketball needs they created or worsened.
Interior finishing

Absences repeatedly created a problem

created in 9 of the final 10 covered games — mainly Jaren Jackson Jr.

Passing connectivity

Absences repeatedly created a problem

created in 9 of the final 10 covered games — mainly Ja Morant

Rebounding

Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problem

worsened in 9 of the final 10 covered games — mainly Santi Aldama

Where money is tied up

Cap position and salary allocation — shown beside the basketball picture, never blended into it.
SupportedThe team was above the second apron on selected player charges, sharply limiting transaction routes.
Selected player charges
$189.1M
Share of cap
135%
Tax line
$18.3M over
First apron
$11.0M over
Second apron
$192K over

Most salary is mapped to passing connectivity; the highest-need area is rebounding. Salary-to-function mapping covers 76% of charges.

Exact figures
Salary cap: $140,588,000Luxury tax line: $170,814,000First apron: $178,132,000Second apron: $188,931,000Selected player charges: $189,122,947Source-reported payroll: $165,903,638 (source-named payroll total; not relabeled as cash or cap)

Exact transaction legality withheld — no exception-usage, cap-hold, and transaction ledger evidence.

What the evidence cannot answer

Deliberate abstentions — where the database refuses a conclusion rather than guessing.
PartialTeam picture available; function-level salary mapping incomplete8 of 11 functions supported
  • Point-of-attack defense proxy: Basketball conclusion withheld
  • Screening: Basketball conclusion withheld
  • Switch coverage proxy: Basketball conclusion withheld

Exact transaction legality: Exact transaction legality withheld — no exception-usage, cap-hold, and transaction ledger evidence

Team-season situation report. Structural basketball quality, recent availability, player dependence, replacement lineups, and financial position remain separate. No acquisition recommendation, transaction grade, coaching grade, outcome claim, or causal value is inferred.