Which supported roster decisions should be reviewed first, what later choices depend on them, and what remains unknowable?
MIN has 2 actionable review nodes, but 1 nodes cannot be placed on a supported planning date.
PartialPartial contract identity coverage2 actionable of 3 nodes · 2 planning anchors · 1 unresolved · 0 exact dates supported
The decision map
Planning anchors are staff workflow dates — grouped, never promoted to exact deadlines.
Jake LaymanExtension reviewGeneral anniversary candidate available exact extension eligibility unresolvedteam and player decideReview a possible extension path for Jake Layman before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.
Extension is agreedNo extension is recorded before the horizon
+What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Extension review candidate visible exact eligibility and terms unresolvedCBA legality: Exact extension eligibility maximum terms and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Player willingness team willingness and price unresolvedSalary input: Extension salary terms unavailableDate basis: Anniversary review candidate — not a deadlineIf “Extension is agreed”: Jake Layman would remain under new control, but eligibility, terms, willingness, price and future cap effects are unavailable.If “No extension is recorded before the horizon”: The existing reported control horizon for Jake Layman remains the planning boundary; no outcome is inferred.
Jake LaymanContract control horizonContract control horizon visible free agency status unresolvedTeam and player market decideReview the visible contract-control boundary for Jake Layman. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
+What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Planning boundary visible free agency and retention rights unresolvedCBA legality: Free agency retention rights and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Future market price unresolvedSalary input: Contract horizon salary beyond boundary unresolvedDate basis: Season boundary proxy
Jake LaymanGuarantee reviewGuarantee structure review exact decision date unavailableTeam subject to contract terms decideReview the visible guarantee structure for Jake Layman. The exact decision date and downstream waiver, roster and cap effects are unavailable.
Guarantee or reported schedule continuesWaive, convert or otherwise change the guarantee state
+What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Withheld — Exact guarantee decision date unresolvedCBA legality: Exact guarantee mechanism date waiver and stretch rules unresolvedMarket price: Not market evidenceSalary input: Reported schedule visible guarantee timing unresolvedDate basis: UnresolvedIf “Guarantee or reported schedule continues”: The reported schedule for Jake Layman is preserved subject to the guarantee source limits.If “Waive, convert or otherwise change the guarantee state”: A waiver or conversion path for Jake Layman cannot be priced without the exact guarantee date and applicable CBA mechanics.
Shared planning dates
Decisions that share a planning date — review pressure, not a claimed order.Jul 8, 20211 decision · 1 player
One review node uses this planning anchor for MIN. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.
Jun 30, 20221 decision · 1 player
One review node uses this planning anchor for MIN. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.
Connected decisions
Same player, same contract — one decision affects the other.Jake LaymanExtension review before the contract horizonJul 8, 2021 → Jun 30, 2022
The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.
Jake LaymanGuarantee review before contract horizonno date → Jun 30, 2022
The guarantee review belongs to the same player and contract as the visible control horizon. Its exact date and waiver or cap effect remain unresolved.
Planning anchors are not automatically exact contract deadlines.
A CBA outside date is an upper bound; an individual contract may require an earlier choice.
Current cap context is not a recalculated future branch result.
Unknown cap holds, rights, exceptions, roster effects, market prices and legal mechanics remain unresolved.
Branches are conditional planning frames, not probabilities or recommendations.
Decision sequence, reported salary, current cap position, roster effect, CBA legality, market price, basketball evidence and outcome evidence remain separate. No blended score or automatic action is produced.