← Team Metrics
Latest

New York Knicks

2025-26
2016-172017-182018-192019-202020-212021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26
Latest available releaseEvidence released Aug 22, 2026, 8:30 PM UTCLive database

What are the New York Knicks in 2025-26, and what needs front-office attention?

NYK 2025-26: no supported structural problem was identified. The strongest covered areas were Shooting and spacing, Creation, Passing connectivity. The main rotation-player dependency cases were Karl-Anthony Towns, OG Anunoby, Mitchell Robinson, Miles McBride. Structural basketball need, injuries, replacement lineups, and financial constraints are reported separately.

CoverageSupported8 supported · 3 withheld
Cap positionAt or above the second apron on selected player charges
Next decision dateNo calendar release at this as-of time

What can be trusted

Supported strengths — production, who carries it, and what money is already committed.
Shooting and spacing
92nd percentile
Josh Hart carries 20.9%
Availability: No material availability problemMoney: Heavy or redundant salary already committed here
Full reading

NYK 2025-26 Shooting and spacing: this was a team strength; production ranked at the 91.7 league percentile. Josh Hart supplied 20.9% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. Recent availability did not create a repeated additional problem. The team already committed substantial or redundant cap resources here.

Creation
88th percentile
Jalen Brunson carries 34.9%
Availability: No material availability problemMoney: Balanced or context-dependent salary commitment
Full reading

NYK 2025-26 Creation: this was a team strength; production ranked at the 87.5 league percentile. Jalen Brunson supplied 34.9% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. Recent availability did not create a repeated additional problem. Financial commitment is shown separately and does not determine basketball quality.

Passing connectivity
83rd percentile
Jalen Brunson carries 29.7%
Availability: No material availability problemMoney: Heavy or redundant salary already committed here
Full reading

NYK 2025-26 Passing connectivity: this was a team strength; production ranked at the 83.3 league percentile. Jalen Brunson supplied 29.7% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. Recent availability did not create a repeated additional problem. The team already committed substantial or redundant cap resources here.

What needs attention

The clearest roster problems the evidence supports.

No supported roster problems are on record for this season — full situation-room coverage available.

Every covered basketball function (11)
FunctionReadingLeague percentileLargest contributorRecent availabilitySalary commitment
CreationSupportedTeam strength88th percentileJalen Brunson · 34.9%No repeated availability problemBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
Defensive event creationSupportedMiddle of the league58th percentileOG Anunoby · 31.3%Absences repeatedly created a problemHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Interior finishingSupportedMiddle of the league42nd percentileKarl-Anthony Towns · 31.1%Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problemHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Passing connectivitySupportedTeam strength83rd percentileJalen Brunson · 29.7%No repeated availability problemHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Point-of-attack defense proxyWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldKarl-Anthony TownsRecent availability conclusion withheldBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
ReboundingSupportedTeam strength79th percentileKarl-Anthony Towns · 34.6%Isolated availability problemHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Rim pressureSupportedMiddle of the league63rd percentileKarl-Anthony Towns · 32.9%Isolated availability problemHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Rim protectionSupportedMiddle of the league42nd percentileKarl-Anthony Towns · 25.0%Absences repeatedly created a problemHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
ScreeningWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldKarl-Anthony TownsRecent availability conclusion withheldBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
Shooting and spacingSupportedTeam strength92nd percentileJosh Hart · 20.9%No repeated availability problemHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Switch coverage proxyWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldKarl-Anthony TownsRecent availability conclusion withheldBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment

Who the team depends on

What disappears when a player is removed — and whether an observed replacement five exists.
Karl-Anthony Towns
Single-skill dependence

NYK did not have strong functional backup for Karl-Anthony Towns in interior finish; removing him cost about 31.1% of the team's production in that area. The next observed option was Mikal Bridges.

rotation 60%loses 31.1% of interior finishing
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Karl-Anthony Towns

OG Anunoby · Josh Hart · Mikal Bridges · Jalen Brunson · Mitchell Robinson

shrunk net 5.776 over 176 possessions — small sample

on floor 5,281 possessions · off floor 3,443 possessions

OG Anunoby
Single-skill dependence

NYK did not have strong functional backup for OG Anunoby in event creation; removing him cost about 31.3% of the team's production in that area. The next observed option was Mikal Bridges.

rotation 58%loses 31.3% of defensive event creation
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without OG Anunoby

Karl-Anthony Towns · Josh Hart · Mikal Bridges · Jalen Brunson · Miles McBride

shrunk net 5.855 over 271 possessions — small sample

on floor 5,165 possessions · off floor 3,572 possessions

Mitchell Robinson
Lineup performance dependence

NYK lineups performed 3.6 points per 100 possessions better with Mitchell Robinson than without him. The best supported alternative was [Karl-Anthony Towns, Josh Hart, Mikal Bridges, Jalen Brunson, Miles McBride] over 271 possessions.

rotation 30%loses 18.1% of defensive event creation
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Mitchell Robinson

Karl-Anthony Towns · Josh Hart · Mikal Bridges · Jalen Brunson · Miles McBride

shrunk net 5.855 over 271 possessions — small sample

on floor 2,504 possessions · off floor 6,254 possessions

Miles McBride
Lineup performance dependence

NYK lineups performed 4.0 points per 100 possessions better with Miles McBride than without him. The best supported alternative was [OG Anunoby, Josh Hart, Mikal Bridges, Jalen Brunson, Mitchell Robinson] over 176 possessions.

rotation 29%loses 11.1% of shooting and spacing
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Miles McBride

OG Anunoby · Josh Hart · Mikal Bridges · Jalen Brunson · Mitchell Robinson

shrunk net 5.776 over 176 possessions — small sample

on floor 2,464 possessions · off floor 6,293 possessions

Function loss, lineup performance, and replacement-lineup evidence remain separate; none is causal player value.

What injuries change

Recent absences and the basketball needs they created or worsened.
Defensive event creation

Absences repeatedly created a problem

created in 3 of the final 10 covered games — mainly OG Anunoby

Interior finishing

Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problem

worsened in 3 of the final 10 covered games — mainly OG Anunoby

Rim protection

Absences repeatedly created a problem

created in 3 of the final 10 covered games — mainly OG Anunoby

Where money is tied up

Cap position and salary allocation — shown beside the basketball picture, never blended into it.
SupportedThe team was above the second apron on selected player charges, sharply limiting transaction routes.
Selected player charges
$209.9M
Share of cap
136%
Tax line
$22.0M over
First apron
$14.0M over
Second apron
$2.08M over

Most salary is mapped to creation; the highest-need area is interior finishing. Salary-to-function mapping covers 96% of charges.

Exact figures
Salary cap: $154,647,000Luxury tax line: $187,895,000First apron: $195,945,000Second apron: $207,824,000Selected player charges: $209,901,407Source-reported payroll: $207,045,051 (source-named payroll total; not relabeled as cash or cap)

Exact transaction legality withheld — no exception-usage, cap-hold, and transaction ledger evidence.

What the evidence cannot answer

Deliberate abstentions — where the database refuses a conclusion rather than guessing.
SupportedFull situation-room coverage available8 of 11 functions supported
  • Point-of-attack defense proxy: Basketball conclusion withheld
  • Screening: Basketball conclusion withheld
  • Switch coverage proxy: Basketball conclusion withheld

Exact transaction legality: Exact transaction legality withheld — no exception-usage, cap-hold, and transaction ledger evidence

Team-season situation report. Structural basketball quality, recent availability, player dependence, replacement lineups, and financial position remain separate. No acquisition recommendation, transaction grade, coaching grade, outcome claim, or causal value is inferred.