← Team Metrics
Latest

Orlando Magic

2021-22
2016-172017-182018-192019-202020-212021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26
Latest available releaseEvidence released Aug 22, 2026, 8:30 PM UTCLive database

What were the Orlando Magic in 2021-22, and what needed front-office attention?

ORL 2021-22: the clearest roster problems were Defensive event creation, Shooting and spacing. The strongest covered areas were Interior finishing, Passing connectivity. The main rotation-player dependency cases were Wendell Carter Jr., Mo Bamba, Chuma Okeke, Gary Harris, Robin Lopez. Structural basketball need, injuries, replacement lineups, and financial constraints are reported separately.

CoveragePartial8 supported · 3 withheld
Cap positionOver the cap, below the tax line, on selected player charges
Next decision dateJun 30, 2022 · 4 events →

What can be trusted

Supported strengths — production, who carries it, and what money is already committed.
Interior finishing
77th percentile
Franz Wagner carries 19.6%
Availability: Absences repeatedly created a problemMoney: Salary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Full reading

ORL 2021-22 Interior finishing: this was a team strength; production ranked at the 77.3 league percentile. Franz Wagner supplied 19.6% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. Absences created a shortage in 8 of the final 10 covered games. Function-level salary allocation was incomplete and is withheld.

Passing connectivity
77th percentile
Franz Wagner carries 18.5%
Availability: Absences repeatedly created a problemMoney: Salary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Full reading

ORL 2021-22 Passing connectivity: this was a team strength; production ranked at the 77.3 league percentile. Franz Wagner supplied 18.5% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. Absences created a shortage in 8 of the final 10 covered games. Function-level salary allocation was incomplete and is withheld.

What needs attention

The clearest roster problems the evidence supports.
Defensive event creation
14th percentile
Chuma Okeke carries 40.9%
Availability: Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problemMoney: Salary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Full reading

ORL 2021-22 Defensive event creation: this was one of the team's clearest roster problems; production ranked at the 13.6 league percentile. Chuma Okeke supplied 40.9% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. Absences made the problem worse in 10 of the final 10 covered games. Function-level salary allocation was incomplete and is withheld.

Shooting and spacing
14th percentile
Gary Harris carries 27.7%
Availability: Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problemMoney: Salary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Full reading

ORL 2021-22 Shooting and spacing: this was one of the team's clearest roster problems; production ranked at the 13.6 league percentile. Gary Harris supplied 27.7% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. Absences made the problem worse in 4 of the final 10 covered games. Function-level salary allocation was incomplete and is withheld.

Every covered basketball function (11)
FunctionReadingLeague percentileLargest contributorRecent availabilitySalary commitment
CreationSupportedMiddle of the league73rd percentileFranz Wagner · 21.1%Absences repeatedly created a problemSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Defensive event creationSupportedCritical team problem14th percentileChuma Okeke · 40.9%Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problemSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Interior finishingSupportedTeam strength77th percentileFranz Wagner · 19.6%Absences repeatedly created a problemSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Passing connectivitySupportedTeam strength77th percentileFranz Wagner · 18.5%Absences repeatedly created a problemSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Point-of-attack defense proxyWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldFranz WagnerRecent availability conclusion withheldSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
ReboundingSupportedMiddle of the league50th percentileWendell Carter Jr. · 24.3%Absences repeatedly created a problemSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Rim pressureSupportedMiddle of the league32nd percentileWendell Carter Jr. · 25.8%Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problemSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Rim protectionSupportedMiddle of the league68th percentileMo Bamba · 32.1%Absences repeatedly created a problemSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
ScreeningWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldWendell Carter Jr.Recent availability conclusion withheldSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Shooting and spacingSupportedCritical team problem14th percentileGary Harris · 27.7%Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problemSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Switch coverage proxyWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldWendell Carter Jr.Recent availability conclusion withheldSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low

Who the team depends on

What disappears when a player is removed — and whether an observed replacement five exists.
Wendell Carter Jr.
Critical basketball and lineup dependence

ORL was highly dependent on Wendell Carter Jr.. Removing him cost about 26.1% of rim protection production, and lineups with him performed 6.5 points per 100 possessions better than lineups without him. The best supported replacement group was [Mo Bamba, Chuma Okeke, Cole Anthony, R.J. Hampton, Franz Wagner] over 167 possessions.

rotation 47%loses 26.1% of rim protection
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Wendell Carter Jr.

Mo Bamba · Chuma Okeke · Cole Anthony · R.J. Hampton · Franz Wagner

shrunk net -2.6 over 167 possessions — small sample

on floor 3,434 possessions · off floor 3,913 possessions

Mo Bamba
Single-skill dependence

ORL did not have strong functional backup for Mo Bamba in rim protection; removing him cost about 32.1% of the team's production in that area. The next observed option was Wendell Carter Jr..

rotation 46%loses 32.1% of rim protection
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Mo Bamba

Gary Harris · Wendell Carter Jr. · Chuma Okeke · Cole Anthony · Franz Wagner

shrunk net -1.564 over 151 possessions — small sample

on floor 3,379 possessions · off floor 3,945 possessions

Chuma Okeke
Single-skill dependence

ORL did not have strong functional backup for Chuma Okeke in event creation; removing him cost about 40.9% of the team's production in that area. The next observed option was Jalen Suggs.

rotation 44%loses 40.9% of defensive event creation
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Chuma Okeke

Gary Harris · Mo Bamba · Wendell Carter Jr. · Cole Anthony · Franz Wagner

shrunk net 1.741 over 304 possessions

on floor 3,275 possessions · off floor 4,067 possessions

Gary Harris
Lineup performance dependence

ORL lineups performed 3.6 points per 100 possessions better with Gary Harris than without him. The best supported alternative was [Mo Bamba, Wendell Carter Jr., Cole Anthony, Franz Wagner, Jalen Suggs] over 810 possessions.

rotation 44%loses 27.7% of shooting and spacing
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Gary Harris

Mo Bamba · Wendell Carter Jr. · Cole Anthony · Franz Wagner · Jalen Suggs

shrunk net -0.982 over 810 possessions

on floor 3,191 possessions · off floor 4,156 possessions

Robin Lopez
Lineup performance dependence

ORL lineups performed 3.3 points per 100 possessions better with Robin Lopez than without him. The best supported alternative was [Gary Harris, Mo Bamba, Wendell Carter Jr., Cole Anthony, Franz Wagner] over 304 possessions.

rotation 15%loses 7.6% of rim protection
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Robin Lopez

Gary Harris · Mo Bamba · Wendell Carter Jr. · Cole Anthony · Franz Wagner

shrunk net 1.741 over 304 possessions

on floor 1,140 possessions · off floor 6,207 possessions

Function loss, lineup performance, and replacement-lineup evidence remain separate; none is causal player value.

What injuries change

Recent absences and the basketball needs they created or worsened.
Defensive event creation

Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problem

worsened in 10 of the final 10 covered games — mainly Jalen Suggs

Rim pressure

Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problem

worsened in 10 of the final 10 covered games — mainly Wendell Carter Jr.

Creation

Absences repeatedly created a problem

created in 8 of the final 10 covered games — mainly Franz Wagner

Interior finishing

Absences repeatedly created a problem

created in 8 of the final 10 covered games — mainly Franz Wagner

Passing connectivity

Absences repeatedly created a problem

created in 8 of the final 10 covered games — mainly Franz Wagner

Rebounding

Absences repeatedly created a problem

created in 8 of the final 10 covered games — mainly Wendell Carter Jr.

Rim protection

Absences repeatedly created a problem

created in 8 of the final 10 covered games — mainly Wendell Carter Jr.

Shooting and spacing

Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problem

worsened in 4 of the final 10 covered games — mainly Gary Harris

Where money is tied up

Cap position and salary allocation — shown beside the basketball picture, never blended into it.
WithheldThe team was over the cap but below the tax on selected player charges; exception detail remains withheld.
Selected player charges
$126.8M
Share of cap
113%
Tax line
$9.82M under
First apron
$16.2M under
Second apron
No governed line that season

Most salary is mapped to passing connectivity; the highest-need area is shooting and spacing. Salary-to-function mapping covers 74% of charges.

Exact figures
Salary cap: $112,414,000Luxury tax line: $136,606,000First apron: $143,002,000Second apron: Selected player charges: $126,786,646

Exact transaction legality withheld — no exception-usage, cap-hold, and transaction ledger evidence.

What the evidence cannot answer

Deliberate abstentions — where the database refuses a conclusion rather than guessing.
PartialTeam picture available; function-level salary mapping incomplete8 of 11 functions supported
  • Point-of-attack defense proxy: Basketball conclusion withheld
  • Screening: Basketball conclusion withheld
  • Switch coverage proxy: Basketball conclusion withheld

Exact transaction legality: Exact transaction legality withheld — no exception-usage, cap-hold, and transaction ledger evidence

Team-season situation report. Structural basketball quality, recent availability, player dependence, replacement lineups, and financial position remain separate. No acquisition recommendation, transaction grade, coaching grade, outcome claim, or causal value is inferred.