← Team Metrics
Latest

Philadelphia 76ers

2016-17
2016-172017-182018-192019-202020-212021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26
Latest available releaseEvidence released Aug 22, 2026, 8:30 PM UTCLive database

What were the Philadelphia 76ers in 2016-17, and what needed front-office attention?

PHI 2016-17: the clearest roster problems were Interior finishing, Shooting and spacing, Creation. No supported strength was identified. The main rotation-player dependency cases were Robert Covington, Nik Stauskas, Dario Saric, T.J. McConnell, Timothe Luwawu-Cabarrot. Structural basketball need, injuries, replacement lineups, and financial constraints are reported separately.

CoveragePartial8 supported · 3 withheld
Cap positionUnder cap on selected player charges
Next decision dateJun 30, 2017 · 7 events →

What can be trusted

Supported strengths — production, who carries it, and what money is already committed.

No supported team strengths for this season — team picture available; recent availability and function-level salary mapping incomplete.

What needs attention

The clearest roster problems the evidence supports.
Interior finishing
4th percentile
Dario Saric carries 23.7%
Availability: No governed recent availability evidence for this seasonMoney: Salary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Full reading

PHI 2016-17 Interior finishing: this was one of the team's clearest roster problems; production ranked at the 3.8 league percentile. Dario Saric supplied 23.7% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season. Function-level salary allocation was incomplete and is withheld.

Shooting and spacing
19th percentile
Nik Stauskas carries 39.0%
Availability: No governed recent availability evidence for this seasonMoney: Salary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Full reading

PHI 2016-17 Shooting and spacing: this was one of the team's clearest roster problems; production ranked at the 19.2 league percentile. Nik Stauskas supplied 39.0% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season. Function-level salary allocation was incomplete and is withheld.

Creation
4th percentile
T.J. McConnell carries 29.8%
Availability: No governed recent availability evidence for this seasonMoney: Salary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Full reading

PHI 2016-17 Creation: this was a real roster weakness; production ranked at the 3.8 league percentile. T.J. McConnell supplied 29.8% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season. Function-level salary allocation was incomplete and is withheld.

Every covered basketball function (11)
FunctionReadingLeague percentileLargest contributorRecent availabilitySalary commitment
CreationSupportedStructural team problem4th percentileT.J. McConnell · 29.8%No recent availability layer for this seasonSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Defensive event creationSupportedMiddle of the league46th percentileRobert Covington · 38.0%No recent availability layer for this seasonSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Interior finishingSupportedCritical team problem4th percentileDario Saric · 23.7%No recent availability layer for this seasonSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Passing connectivitySupportedStructural team problem4th percentileT.J. McConnell · 32.0%No recent availability layer for this seasonSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Point-of-attack defense proxyWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldJahlil OkaforNo recent availability layer for this seasonSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
ReboundingSupportedStructural team problem4th percentileDario Saric · 27.8%No recent availability layer for this seasonSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Rim pressureSupportedMiddle of the league50th percentileDario Saric · 27.7%No recent availability layer for this seasonSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Rim protectionSupportedMiddle of the league31st percentileDario Saric · 19.0%No recent availability layer for this seasonSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
ScreeningWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldJahlil OkaforNo recent availability layer for this seasonSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Shooting and spacingSupportedCritical team problem19th percentileNik Stauskas · 39.0%No recent availability layer for this seasonSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Switch coverage proxyWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldJahlil OkaforNo recent availability layer for this seasonSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low

Who the team depends on

What disappears when a player is removed — and whether an observed replacement five exists.
Robert Covington
Critical basketball and lineup dependence

PHI was highly dependent on Robert Covington. Removing him cost about 38.0% of event creation production, and lineups with him performed 7.9 points per 100 possessions better than lineups without him. The best supported replacement group was [Dario Saric, T.J. McConnell, Justin Anderson, Richaun Holmes, Timothe Luwawu-Cabarrot] over 186 possessions.

rotation 54%loses 38.0% of defensive event creation
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Robert Covington

Dario Saric · T.J. McConnell · Justin Anderson · Richaun Holmes · Timothe Luwawu-Cabarrot

shrunk net -6.06 over 186 possessions — small sample

on floor 3,885 possessions · off floor 3,261 possessions

Nik Stauskas
Single-skill dependence

PHI did not have strong functional backup for Nik Stauskas in shooting; removing him cost about 39.0% of the team's production in that area. The next observed option was Sergio Rodriguez.

rotation 55%loses 39.0% of shooting and spacing
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Nik Stauskas

Sergio Rodriguez · Gerald Henderson · Robert Covington · Joel Embiid · Dario Saric

shrunk net 3.585 over 154 possessions — small sample

on floor 3,868 possessions · off floor 3,278 possessions

Dario Saric
Single-skill dependence

PHI did not have strong functional backup for Dario Saric in rebounding; removing him cost about 27.8% of the team's production in that area. The next observed option was Robert Covington.

rotation 54%loses 27.8% of rebounding
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Dario Saric

Ersan Ilyasova · Robert Covington · Nik Stauskas · Joel Embiid · T.J. McConnell

shrunk net 5.293 over 214 possessions — small sample

on floor 3,856 possessions · off floor 3,290 possessions

T.J. McConnell
Single-skill dependence

PHI did not have strong functional backup for T.J. McConnell in passing; removing him cost about 32.0% of the team's production in that area. The next observed option was Sergio Rodriguez.

rotation 54%loses 32.0% of passing connectivity
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without T.J. McConnell

Sergio Rodriguez · Gerald Henderson · Robert Covington · Joel Embiid · Dario Saric

shrunk net 3.585 over 154 possessions — small sample

on floor 3,942 possessions · off floor 3,204 possessions

Timothe Luwawu-Cabarrot
Lineup performance dependence

PHI lineups performed 4.7 points per 100 possessions better with Timothe Luwawu-Cabarrot than without him. The best supported alternative was [Ersan Ilyasova, Robert Covington, Nik Stauskas, Joel Embiid, T.J. McConnell] over 214 possessions.

rotation 30%loses 11.0% of rim pressure
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Timothe Luwawu-Cabarrot

Ersan Ilyasova · Robert Covington · Nik Stauskas · Joel Embiid · T.J. McConnell

shrunk net 5.293 over 214 possessions — small sample

on floor 2,159 possessions · off floor 4,987 possessions

Function loss, lineup performance, and replacement-lineup evidence remain separate; none is causal player value.

What injuries change

Recent absences and the basketball needs they created or worsened.

No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season.

Where money is tied up

Cap position and salary allocation — shown beside the basketball picture, never blended into it.
SupportedSelected player charges appeared below the cap, but holds and incomplete roster charges prevent a clean cap-room claim.
Selected player charges
$83.4M
Share of cap
89%
Tax line
$29.9M under
First apron
$33.9M under
Second apron
No governed line that season

Most salary is mapped to creation; the highest-need area is shooting and spacing. Salary-to-function mapping covers 62% of charges.

Exact figures
Salary cap: $94,143,000Luxury tax line: $113,287,000First apron: $117,287,000Second apron: Selected player charges: $83,398,383Source-reported payroll: $84,775,343 (source-named payroll total; not relabeled as cash or cap)

Exact transaction legality withheld — no exception-usage, cap-hold, and transaction ledger evidence.

What the evidence cannot answer

Deliberate abstentions — where the database refuses a conclusion rather than guessing.
PartialTeam picture available; recent availability and function-level salary mapping incomplete8 of 11 functions supported
  • Point-of-attack defense proxy: Basketball conclusion withheld
  • Screening: Basketball conclusion withheld
  • Switch coverage proxy: Basketball conclusion withheld

Exact transaction legality: Exact transaction legality withheld — no exception-usage, cap-hold, and transaction ledger evidence

Team-season situation report. Structural basketball quality, recent availability, player dependence, replacement lineups, and financial position remain separate. No acquisition recommendation, transaction grade, coaching grade, outcome claim, or causal value is inferred.