Which supported roster decisions should be reviewed first, what later choices depend on them, and what remains unknowable?
PHX has 5 actionable review nodes, but 1 nodes cannot be placed on a supported planning date.
PartialPartial contract identity coverage5 actionable of 11 nodes · 10 planning anchors · 1 unresolved · 0 exact dates supported
The decision map
Planning anchors are staff workflow dates — grouped, never promoted to exact deadlines.
Tyson ChandlerExtension reviewGeneral anniversary candidate available exact extension eligibility unresolvedteam and player decideReview a possible extension path for Tyson Chandler before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.
Extension is agreedNo extension is recorded before the horizon
+What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Extension review candidate visible exact eligibility and terms unresolvedCBA legality: Exact extension eligibility maximum terms and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Player willingness team willingness and price unresolvedSalary input: Extension salary terms unavailableDate basis: Anniversary review candidate — not a deadlineIf “Extension is agreed”: Tyson Chandler would remain under new control, but eligibility, terms, willingness, price and future cap effects are unavailable.If “No extension is recorded before the horizon”: The existing reported control horizon for Tyson Chandler remains the planning boundary; no outcome is inferred.
Tyler UlisContract control horizonContract control horizon visible free agency status unresolvedTeam and player market decideReview the visible contract-control boundary for Tyler Ulis. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
+What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Planning boundary visible free agency and retention rights unresolvedCBA legality: Free agency retention rights and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Future market price unresolvedSalary input: Contract horizon salary beyond boundary unresolvedDate basis: Season boundary proxy
Jul 7, 2018
2 decisions share this date
Dragan BenderExtension reviewGeneral anniversary candidate available exact extension eligibility unresolvedteam and player decideReview a possible extension path for Dragan Bender before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.
Extension is agreedNo extension is recorded before the horizon
+What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Extension review candidate visible exact eligibility and terms unresolvedCBA legality: Exact extension eligibility maximum terms and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Player willingness team willingness and price unresolvedSalary input: Extension salary terms unavailableDate basis: Anniversary review candidate — not a deadlineIf “Extension is agreed”: Dragan Bender would remain under new control, but eligibility, terms, willingness, price and future cap effects are unavailable.If “No extension is recorded before the horizon”: The existing reported control horizon for Dragan Bender remains the planning boundary; no outcome is inferred.
Marquese ChrissExtension reviewGeneral anniversary candidate available exact extension eligibility unresolvedteam and player decideReview a possible extension path for Marquese Chriss before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.
Extension is agreedNo extension is recorded before the horizon
+What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Extension review candidate visible exact eligibility and terms unresolvedCBA legality: Exact extension eligibility maximum terms and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Player willingness team willingness and price unresolvedSalary input: Extension salary terms unavailableDate basis: Anniversary review candidate — not a deadlineIf “Extension is agreed”: Marquese Chriss would remain under new control, but eligibility, terms, willingness, price and future cap effects are unavailable.If “No extension is recorded before the horizon”: The existing reported control horizon for Marquese Chriss remains the planning boundary; no outcome is inferred.
Jared DudleyExtension reviewGeneral anniversary candidate available exact extension eligibility unresolvedteam and player decideReview a possible extension path for Jared Dudley before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.
Extension is agreedNo extension is recorded before the horizon
+What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Extension review candidate visible exact eligibility and terms unresolvedCBA legality: Exact extension eligibility maximum terms and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Player willingness team willingness and price unresolvedSalary input: Extension salary terms unavailableDate basis: Anniversary review candidate — not a deadlineIf “Extension is agreed”: Jared Dudley would remain under new control, but eligibility, terms, willingness, price and future cap effects are unavailable.If “No extension is recorded before the horizon”: The existing reported control horizon for Jared Dudley remains the planning boundary; no outcome is inferred.
Jun 30, 2019
2 decisions share this date
Jared DudleyContract control horizonContract control horizon visible free agency status unresolvedTeam and player market decide Review the visible contract-control boundary for Jared Dudley. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
+What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Planning boundary visible free agency and retention rights unresolvedCBA legality: Free agency retention rights and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Future market price unresolvedSalary input: Contract horizon salary beyond boundary unresolvedDate basis: Season boundary proxy
Tyson ChandlerContract control horizonContract control horizon visible free agency status unresolvedTeam and player market decide Review the visible contract-control boundary for Tyson Chandler. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
+What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Planning boundary visible free agency and retention rights unresolvedCBA legality: Free agency retention rights and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Future market price unresolvedSalary input: Contract horizon salary beyond boundary unresolvedDate basis: Season boundary proxy
Jun 30, 2020
2 decisions share this date
Dragan BenderContract control horizonContract control horizon visible free agency status unresolvedTeam and player market decide Review the visible contract-control boundary for Dragan Bender. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
+What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Planning boundary visible free agency and retention rights unresolvedCBA legality: Free agency retention rights and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Future market price unresolvedSalary input: Contract horizon salary beyond boundary unresolvedDate basis: Season boundary proxy
Marquese ChrissContract control horizonContract control horizon visible free agency status unresolvedTeam and player market decide Review the visible contract-control boundary for Marquese Chriss. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
+What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Planning boundary visible free agency and retention rights unresolvedCBA legality: Free agency retention rights and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Future market price unresolvedSalary input: Contract horizon salary beyond boundary unresolvedDate basis: Season boundary proxy
Josh JacksonContract control horizonContract control horizon visible free agency status unresolvedTeam and player market decideReview the visible contract-control boundary for Josh Jackson. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
+What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Planning boundary visible free agency and retention rights unresolvedCBA legality: Free agency retention rights and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Future market price unresolvedSalary input: Contract horizon salary beyond boundary unresolvedDate basis: Season boundary proxy
Tyler UlisExtension reviewReview triggered exact extension eligibility unresolvedteam and player decide Review a possible extension path for Tyler Ulis before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.
Extension is agreedNo extension is recorded before the horizon
+What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Withheld — Extension candidate date and exact eligibility unresolvedCBA legality: Exact extension eligibility maximum terms and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Player willingness team willingness and price unresolvedSalary input: Extension salary terms unavailableDate basis: UnresolvedIf “Extension is agreed”: Tyler Ulis would remain under new control, but eligibility, terms, willingness, price and future cap effects are unavailable.If “No extension is recorded before the horizon”: The existing reported control horizon for Tyler Ulis remains the planning boundary; no outcome is inferred.
Shared planning dates
Decisions that share a planning date — review pressure, not a claimed order.Jul 9, 20171 decision · 1 player
One review node uses this planning anchor for PHX. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.
Jun 30, 20181 decision · 1 player
One review node uses this planning anchor for PHX. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.
Jul 7, 20182 decisions · 2 players
2 review nodes share this planning anchor for PHX. They are grouped for staff workflow, not claimed as simultaneous contract deadlines.
Jul 8, 20181 decision · 1 player
One review node uses this planning anchor for PHX. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.
Jun 30, 20192 decisions · 2 players
2 review nodes share this planning anchor for PHX. They are grouped for staff workflow, not claimed as simultaneous contract deadlines.
Jun 30, 20202 decisions · 2 players
2 review nodes share this planning anchor for PHX. They are grouped for staff workflow, not claimed as simultaneous contract deadlines.
Jun 30, 20211 decision · 1 player
One review node uses this planning anchor for PHX. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.
Connected decisions
Same player, same contract — one decision affects the other.Tyson ChandlerExtension review before the contract horizonJul 9, 2017 → Jun 30, 2019
The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.
Dragan BenderExtension review before the contract horizonJul 7, 2018 → Jun 30, 2020
The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.
Marquese ChrissExtension review before the contract horizonJul 7, 2018 → Jun 30, 2020
The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.
Jared DudleyExtension review before the contract horizonJul 8, 2018 → Jun 30, 2019
The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.
Tyler UlisExtension review before the contract horizonno date → Jun 30, 2018
The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.
Planning anchors are not automatically exact contract deadlines.
A CBA outside date is an upper bound; an individual contract may require an earlier choice.
Current cap context is not a recalculated future branch result.
Unknown cap holds, rights, exceptions, roster effects, market prices and legal mechanics remain unresolved.
Branches are conditional planning frames, not probabilities or recommendations.
Decision sequence, reported salary, current cap position, roster effect, CBA legality, market price, basketball evidence and outcome evidence remain separate. No blended score or automatic action is produced.
