Which supported roster decisions should be reviewed first, what later choices depend on them, and what remains unknowable?
SAC has 5 actionable review nodes, but 3 nodes cannot be placed on a supported planning date.
PartialPartial contract identity coverage5 actionable of 10 nodes · 7 planning anchors · 3 unresolved · 0 exact dates supported
The decision map
Planning anchors are staff workflow dates — grouped, never promoted to exact deadlines.
Harrison BarnesExtension reviewGeneral anniversary candidate available exact extension eligibility unresolvedteam and player decideReview a possible extension path for Harrison Barnes before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.
Extension is agreedNo extension is recorded before the horizon
+What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Extension review candidate visible exact eligibility and terms unresolvedCBA legality: Exact extension eligibility maximum terms and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Player willingness team willingness and price unresolvedSalary input: Extension salary terms unavailableDate basis: Anniversary review candidate — not a deadlineIf “Extension is agreed”: Harrison Barnes would remain under new control, but eligibility, terms, willingness, price and future cap effects are unavailable.If “No extension is recorded before the horizon”: The existing reported control horizon for Harrison Barnes remains the planning boundary; no outcome is inferred.
Chimezie MetuExtension reviewGeneral anniversary candidate available exact extension eligibility unresolvedteam and player decideReview a possible extension path for Chimezie Metu before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.
Extension is agreedNo extension is recorded before the horizon
+What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Extension review candidate visible exact eligibility and terms unresolvedCBA legality: Exact extension eligibility maximum terms and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Player willingness team willingness and price unresolvedSalary input: Extension salary terms unavailableDate basis: Anniversary review candidate — not a deadlineIf “Extension is agreed”: Chimezie Metu would remain under new control, but eligibility, terms, willingness, price and future cap effects are unavailable.If “No extension is recorded before the horizon”: The existing reported control horizon for Chimezie Metu remains the planning boundary; no outcome is inferred.
Jun 30, 2023
4 decisions share this date
Alex LenContract control horizonContract control horizon visible free agency status unresolvedTeam and player market decideReview the visible contract-control boundary for Alex Len. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
+What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Planning boundary visible free agency and retention rights unresolvedCBA legality: Free agency retention rights and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Future market price unresolvedSalary input: Contract horizon salary beyond boundary unresolvedDate basis: Season boundary proxy
Chimezie MetuContract control horizonContract control horizon visible free agency status unresolvedTeam and player market decideReview the visible contract-control boundary for Chimezie Metu. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
+What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Planning boundary visible free agency and retention rights unresolvedCBA legality: Free agency retention rights and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Future market price unresolvedSalary input: Contract horizon salary beyond boundary unresolvedDate basis: Season boundary proxy
Harrison BarnesContract control horizonContract control horizon visible free agency status unresolvedTeam and player market decideReview the visible contract-control boundary for Harrison Barnes. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
+What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Planning boundary visible free agency and retention rights unresolvedCBA legality: Free agency retention rights and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Future market price unresolvedSalary input: Contract horizon salary beyond boundary unresolvedDate basis: Season boundary proxy
Maurice HarklessContract control horizonContract control horizon visible free agency status unresolvedTeam and player market decideReview the visible contract-control boundary for Maurice Harkless. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
+What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Planning boundary visible free agency and retention rights unresolvedCBA legality: Free agency retention rights and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Future market price unresolvedSalary input: Contract horizon salary beyond boundary unresolvedDate basis: Season boundary proxy
Richaun HolmesContract control horizonContract control horizon visible free agency status unresolvedTeam and player market decideReview the visible contract-control boundary for Richaun Holmes. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
+What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Planning boundary visible free agency and retention rights unresolvedCBA legality: Free agency retention rights and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Future market price unresolvedSalary input: Contract horizon salary beyond boundary unresolvedDate basis: Season boundary proxy
No supported date
3 decisions share this date
Alex LenExtension reviewReview triggered exact extension eligibility unresolvedteam and player decideReview a possible extension path for Alex Len before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.
Extension is agreedNo extension is recorded before the horizon
+What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Withheld — Extension candidate date and exact eligibility unresolvedCBA legality: Exact extension eligibility maximum terms and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Player willingness team willingness and price unresolvedSalary input: Extension salary terms unavailableDate basis: UnresolvedIf “Extension is agreed”: Alex Len would remain under new control, but eligibility, terms, willingness, price and future cap effects are unavailable.If “No extension is recorded before the horizon”: The existing reported control horizon for Alex Len remains the planning boundary; no outcome is inferred.
Maurice HarklessExtension reviewReview triggered exact extension eligibility unresolvedteam and player decideReview a possible extension path for Maurice Harkless before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.
Extension is agreedNo extension is recorded before the horizon
+What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Withheld — Extension candidate date and exact eligibility unresolvedCBA legality: Exact extension eligibility maximum terms and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Player willingness team willingness and price unresolvedSalary input: Extension salary terms unavailableDate basis: UnresolvedIf “Extension is agreed”: Maurice Harkless would remain under new control, but eligibility, terms, willingness, price and future cap effects are unavailable.If “No extension is recorded before the horizon”: The existing reported control horizon for Maurice Harkless remains the planning boundary; no outcome is inferred.
Chimezie MetuGuarantee reviewGuarantee structure review exact decision date unavailableTeam subject to contract terms decideReview the visible guarantee structure for Chimezie Metu. The exact decision date and downstream waiver, roster and cap effects are unavailable.
Guarantee or reported schedule continuesWaive, convert or otherwise change the guarantee state
+What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Withheld — Exact guarantee decision date unresolvedCBA legality: Exact guarantee mechanism date waiver and stretch rules unresolvedMarket price: Not market evidenceSalary input: Reported schedule visible guarantee timing unresolvedDate basis: UnresolvedIf “Guarantee or reported schedule continues”: The reported schedule for Chimezie Metu is preserved subject to the guarantee source limits.If “Waive, convert or otherwise change the guarantee state”: A waiver or conversion path for Chimezie Metu cannot be priced without the exact guarantee date and applicable CBA mechanics.
Shared planning dates
Decisions that share a planning date — review pressure, not a claimed order.Jul 8, 20211 decision · 1 player
One review node uses this planning anchor for SAC. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.
Nov 27, 20221 decision · 1 player
One review node uses this planning anchor for SAC. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.
Jun 30, 20234 decisions · 4 players
4 review nodes share this planning anchor for SAC. They are grouped for staff workflow, not claimed as simultaneous contract deadlines.
Jun 30, 20251 decision · 1 player
One review node uses this planning anchor for SAC. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.
Connected decisions
Same player, same contract — one decision affects the other.Harrison BarnesExtension review before the contract horizonJul 8, 2021 → Jun 30, 2023
The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.
Chimezie MetuExtension review before the contract horizonNov 27, 2022 → Jun 30, 2023
The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.
Alex LenExtension review before the contract horizonno date → Jun 30, 2023
The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.
Maurice HarklessExtension review before the contract horizonno date → Jun 30, 2023
The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.
Chimezie MetuGuarantee review before contract horizonno date → Jun 30, 2023
The guarantee review belongs to the same player and contract as the visible control horizon. Its exact date and waiver or cap effect remain unresolved.
Planning anchors are not automatically exact contract deadlines.
A CBA outside date is an upper bound; an individual contract may require an earlier choice.
Current cap context is not a recalculated future branch result.
Unknown cap holds, rights, exceptions, roster effects, market prices and legal mechanics remain unresolved.
Branches are conditional planning frames, not probabilities or recommendations.
Decision sequence, reported salary, current cap position, roster effect, CBA legality, market price, basketball evidence and outcome evidence remain separate. No blended score or automatic action is produced.