← Team Metrics
Latest

Utah Jazz

2021-22
2016-172017-182018-192019-202020-212021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26
Latest available releaseEvidence released Aug 22, 2026, 8:30 PM UTCLive database

What were the Utah Jazz in 2021-22, and what needed front-office attention?

UTA 2021-22: the clearest roster problems were Rim protection. The strongest covered areas were Rebounding. The main rotation-player dependency cases were Rudy Gobert, Donovan Mitchell, Bojan Bogdanovic, Mike Conley, Jordan Clarkson. Structural basketball need, injuries, replacement lineups, and financial constraints are reported separately.

CoverageSupported9 supported · 2 withheld
Cap positionAt or above first apron no second apron threshold
Next decision dateNo calendar release at this as-of time

What can be trusted

Supported strengths — production, who carries it, and what money is already committed.
Rebounding
77th percentile
Rudy Gobert carries 26.6%
Availability: Isolated availability problemMoney: Heavy or redundant salary already committed here
Full reading

UTA 2021-22 Rebounding: this was a team strength; production ranked at the 77.3 league percentile. Rudy Gobert supplied 26.6% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. Availability created or worsened the issue in isolated recent games. The team already committed substantial or redundant cap resources here.

What needs attention

The clearest roster problems the evidence supports.
Rim protection
9th percentile
Rudy Gobert carries 59.0%
Availability: Isolated availability problemMoney: Cost concentrated in one provider
Full reading

UTA 2021-22 Rim protection: this was one of the team's clearest roster problems; production ranked at the 9.1 league percentile. Rudy Gobert supplied 59.0% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. Availability created or worsened the issue in isolated recent games. Cap spending in this area was concentrated in one player.

Every covered basketball function (11)
FunctionReadingLeague percentileLargest contributorRecent availabilitySalary commitment
CreationSupportedMiddle of the league41st percentileDonovan Mitchell · 29.1%Absences repeatedly created a problemHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Defensive event creationSupportedMiddle of the league46th percentileMike Conley · 29.2%Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problemHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Interior finishingSupportedMiddle of the league46th percentileRudy Gobert · 32.7%Isolated availability problemHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Passing connectivitySupportedMiddle of the league27th percentileMike Conley · 29.0%Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problemHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Point-of-attack defense proxyWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldJordan ClarksonRecent availability conclusion withheldBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
ReboundingSupportedTeam strength77th percentileRudy Gobert · 26.6%Isolated availability problemHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Rim pressureSupportedMiddle of the league73rd percentileBojan Bogdanovic · 23.7%Isolated availability problemHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Rim protectionSupportedCritical team problem9th percentileRudy Gobert · 59.0%Isolated availability problemCost concentrated in one provider
ScreeningSupportedMiddle-tier area with one-player risk70th percentileRudy Gobert · 62.9%No repeated availability problemCost concentrated in one provider
Shooting and spacingSupportedMiddle of the league73rd percentileBojan Bogdanovic · 25.6%Isolated availability problemHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Switch coverage proxyWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldJordan ClarksonRecent availability conclusion withheldBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment

Who the team depends on

What disappears when a player is removed — and whether an observed replacement five exists.
Rudy Gobert
Critical basketball and lineup dependence

UTA was highly dependent on Rudy Gobert. Removing him cost about 59.0% of rim protection production, and lineups with him performed 5.9 points per 100 possessions better than lineups without him. The best supported replacement group was [Hassan Whiteside, Bojan Bogdanovic, Jordan Clarkson, Royce O'Neale, Donovan Mitchell] over 415 possessions.

rotation 55%loses 59.0% of rim protection
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Rudy Gobert

Hassan Whiteside · Bojan Bogdanovic · Jordan Clarkson · Royce O'Neale · Donovan Mitchell

shrunk net 1.189 over 415 possessions

on floor 4,110 possessions · off floor 3,321 possessions

Donovan Mitchell
Single-skill dependence

UTA did not have strong functional backup for Donovan Mitchell in creation; removing him cost about 29.1% of the team's production in that area. The next observed option was Mike Conley.

rotation 59%loses 29.1% of creation
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Donovan Mitchell

Rudy Gay · Mike Conley · Rudy Gobert · Jordan Clarkson · Joe Ingles

shrunk net 8.096 over 414 possessions

on floor 4,379 possessions · off floor 3,052 possessions

Bojan Bogdanovic
Single-skill dependence

UTA did not have strong functional backup for Bojan Bogdanovic in shooting; removing him cost about 25.6% of the team's production in that area. The next observed option was Royce O'Neale.

rotation 55%loses 25.6% of shooting and spacing
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Bojan Bogdanovic

Rudy Gay · Mike Conley · Rudy Gobert · Jordan Clarkson · Joe Ingles

shrunk net 8.096 over 414 possessions

on floor 4,121 possessions · off floor 3,310 possessions

Mike Conley
Single-skill dependence

UTA did not have strong functional backup for Mike Conley in passing; removing him cost about 29.0% of the team's production in that area. The next observed option was Donovan Mitchell.

rotation 53%loses 29.0% of passing connectivity
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Mike Conley

Bojan Bogdanovic · Rudy Gobert · Jordan Clarkson · Royce O'Neale · Donovan Mitchell

shrunk net 3.235 over 194 possessions — small sample

on floor 4,046 possessions · off floor 3,385 possessions

Jordan Clarkson
Lineup performance dependence

UTA lineups performed 3.1 points per 100 possessions better with Jordan Clarkson than without him. The best supported alternative was [Mike Conley, Bojan Bogdanovic, Rudy Gobert, Royce O'Neale, Donovan Mitchell] over 1378 possessions.

rotation 55%loses 13.5% of creation
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Jordan Clarkson

Mike Conley · Bojan Bogdanovic · Rudy Gobert · Royce O'Neale · Donovan Mitchell

shrunk net 3.35 over 1,378 possessions

on floor 3,951 possessions · off floor 3,480 possessions

Function loss, lineup performance, and replacement-lineup evidence remain separate; none is causal player value.

What injuries change

Recent absences and the basketball needs they created or worsened.
Creation

Absences repeatedly created a problem

created in 10 of the final 10 covered games — mainly Donovan Mitchell

Defensive event creation

Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problem

worsened in 10 of the final 10 covered games — mainly Mike Conley

Passing connectivity

Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problem

worsened in 10 of the final 10 covered games — mainly Mike Conley

Where money is tied up

Cap position and salary allocation — shown beside the basketball picture, never blended into it.
SupportedThe financial threshold state is era-specific and must be read with the underlying rules.
Selected player charges
$149.8M
Share of cap
133%
Tax line
$13.2M over
First apron
$6.76M over
Second apron
No governed line that season

Most salary is mapped to interior finishing; the highest-need area is rim protection. Salary-to-function mapping covers 92% of charges.

Exact figures
Salary cap: $112,414,000Luxury tax line: $136,606,000First apron: $143,002,000Second apron: Selected player charges: $149,760,719

Exact transaction legality withheld — no exception-usage, cap-hold, and transaction ledger evidence.

What the evidence cannot answer

Deliberate abstentions — where the database refuses a conclusion rather than guessing.
SupportedFull situation-room coverage available9 of 11 functions supported
  • Point-of-attack defense proxy: Basketball conclusion withheld
  • Switch coverage proxy: Basketball conclusion withheld

Exact transaction legality: Exact transaction legality withheld — no exception-usage, cap-hold, and transaction ledger evidence

Team-season situation report. Structural basketball quality, recent availability, player dependence, replacement lineups, and financial position remain separate. No acquisition recommendation, transaction grade, coaching grade, outcome claim, or causal value is inferred.