← Team Metrics
Latest

Utah Jazz

2025-26
2016-172017-182018-192019-202020-212021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26
Latest available releaseLive database

How much flexibility do the Utah Jazz actually have in 2025-26?

UTA 2025-26 carried $177,687,061 of selected player charges (114.9% of the cap), placing it in over cap below tax on selected player charges. Its highest contracted function cost was interior finishing at 18.5% of the cap; highest measured need was rim protection. Exact exception and transaction legality is withheld without team cap-hold and exception-use ledgers.

Current cap position

Current position on selected player charges — not every cap hold or dead-money charge.
SupportedOver the cap, below the tax line, on selected player charges
Selected player charges
$177.7M
Share of cap
115%
Tax line
$10.2M under
First apron
$18.3M under
Second apron
$30.1M under
Exact thresholds
Salary cap: $154,647,000Luxury tax line: $187,895,000First apron: $195,945,000Second apron: $207,824,000Selected player charges: $177,687,061Source-reported payroll: $175,673,708

Option exposure

Optional decisions ahead — reported amounts, not commitments.
Player options (0)
None
Team options (2)
$9.16M

Where the money maps

Which basketball functions the payroll is actually buying — shown beside need, never blended.

The largest contracted function cost is interior finishing at $28.6M; the highest measured need is rim protection.

6 critical-need functions0 underfunded needs0 redundant-cost functionsmapping covers 60% of charges

Acquisition paths

Threshold candidates only — a candidate route is not exact transaction legality.
Bird-rights retention (threshold candidate)Trade salary matching (threshold candidate)Non-taxpayer exception (threshold candidate only)Minimum signing
WithheldExact transaction legality withheld — no exception-usage, cap-hold, and transaction ledger evidence

Cash cost: Withheld — no cash-salary sample.

Selected player charges do not include every cap hold, dead-money charge or roster charge.

Threshold route candidates are not exact transaction legality.

Cash, cap and economic commitment remain separate; no universal flexibility or front-office score.