Gingeball

League Board

Which teams have the most open conditional paths — and how much still needs a dated test?

As ofLatest

Decision volume Planning windows Sequencing workload Keep/exit optionality Competitive window

2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26

sorted by open paths · click a column to re-sort · click a team for its workspace · open a row for why it is here

Team	Branches	Open paths	Needs planning	Needs evidence	Needs dated test	Path abstentions	Basketball gaps
LAC LAC has 24 conditional decision branches and 18 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:First apron pressure review triggeredDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	24	18	2	30	24	28	12
IND IND has 14 conditional decision branches and 14 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	14	14	0	14	14	14	4
CHO CHO has 14 conditional decision branches and 13 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	14	13	1	15	14	14	2
BRK BRK has 16 conditional decision branches and 12 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:First apron pressure review triggeredDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	16	12	0	20	16	4	16
GSW GSW has 14 conditional decision branches and 12 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:First apron pressure review triggeredDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	14	12	2	16	14	14	2
MIL MIL has 16 conditional decision branches and 12 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Tax pressure review triggeredDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	16	12	0	20	16	20	16
SAS SAS has 14 conditional decision branches and 12 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:WithheldWithheld — No future pick control evidence	14	12	2	2	14	28	0
TOR TOR has 16 conditional decision branches and 12 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:WithheldWithheld — No future pick control evidence	16	12	0	4	16	36	16
CHI CHI has 12 conditional decision branches and 11 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	12	11	0	13	12	13	12
LAL LAL has 14 conditional decision branches and 11 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:First apron pressure review triggeredDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	14	11	0	17	14	17	14
BOS BOS has 12 conditional decision branches and 10 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Tax pressure review triggeredDraft:WithheldWithheld — No future pick control evidence	12	10	2	2	12	24	2
MEM MEM has 12 conditional decision branches and 10 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	12	10	1	14	12	13	8
MIA MIA has 12 conditional decision branches and 10 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Tax pressure review triggeredDraft:WithheldWithheld — No future pick control evidence	12	10	2	2	12	24	2
DAL DAL has 10 conditional decision branches and 9 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:WithheldWithheld — No future pick control evidence	10	9	1	1	10	20	2
UTA UTA has 10 conditional decision branches and 9 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Tax pressure review triggeredDraft:WithheldWithheld — No future pick control evidence	10	9	1	1	10	20	0
DEN DEN has 10 conditional decision branches and 8 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:WithheldWithheld — No future pick control evidence	10	8	0	2	10	22	10
NYK NYK has 10 conditional decision branches and 8 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	10	8	0	12	10	12	10
POR POR has 8 conditional decision branches and 8 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:WithheldWithheld — No future pick control evidence	8	8	0	0	8	16	8
ATL ATL has 8 conditional decision branches and 7 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	8	7	0	9	8	9	8
MIN MIN has 10 conditional decision branches and 7 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	10	7	3	13	10	10	0
PHX PHX has 8 conditional decision branches and 7 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:WithheldWithheld — No future pick control evidence	8	7	0	1	8	9	8
SAC SAC has 8 conditional decision branches and 7 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	8	7	0	9	8	9	8
CLE CLE has 6 conditional decision branches and 5 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	6	5	0	7	6	7	6
PHI PHI has 6 conditional decision branches and 5 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:First apron pressure review triggeredDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	6	5	0	7	6	7	6
HOU HOU has 4 conditional decision branches and 4 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	4	4	0	4	4	0	4
NOP NOP has 4 conditional decision branches and 4 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Tax pressure review triggeredDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	4	4	0	4	4	4	4
OKC OKC has 4 conditional decision branches and 3 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	4	3	0	5	4	5	4
WAS WAS has 2 conditional decision branches and 2 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	2	2	0	2	2	0	2
DET DET has no actionable option, extension or guarantee branches to map. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:WithheldWithheld — No future pick control evidence	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
ORL ORL has no actionable option, extension or guarantee branches to map. Coverage:WithheldWithheld — No governed core playersCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	0	0	0	0	0	0	0

League rows compare evidence coverage and conditional path counts, not team quality or front-office success.